The Soviet Union revolutionized their education system, making it universal in a country that before that was mostly illiterate peasants. By the Cold War many people considered it one of the best examples of universal education in the world, and one of the big factors in them becoming a superpower.

Do you consider them liberal capitalists? Or would you say they just borrowed the idea?

I guess that is beside the point as you have explained how liberal capitalism is still the main problem. It's just that your vision of the current system is way outside my framework and would require a long essay to explain. To me capitalism is just synonymous with economics, which is a basic law of human nature.

The Soviet Union revolutionized their education system, making it universal in a country that before that was mostly illiterate peasants. By the Cold War many people considered it one of the best examples of universal education in the world, and one of the big factors in them becoming a superpower.

Do you consider them liberal capitalists? You might actually. It's kind of hard to see where you're coming from. Or would you say they just borrowed the idea?

I guess that is beside the point as you have explained how liberal capitalism is still the main problem. It's just that your vision of the current system is way outside my framework and would require a long essay to explain. To me capitalism is just synonymous with economics, which is a basic law of human nature.

The Soviet Union revolutionized their education system, making it universal in a country that before that was mostly illiterate peasants. By the Cold War many people considered it one of the best examples of universal education in the world, and one of the big factors in them becoming a superpower.

Do you consider them liberal capitalists? You might actually. It's kind of hard to see where you're coming from. Or would you say they just borrowed the idea?