Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

It wasn't supposed to be more efficient (it wasn't, and which you can compare to the tens of thousands machine gunned in 1 day in the Aktion Erntefest in 1943, following preparations of course), but more humane. In particular more humane for German personnel (who furthermore were barely involved in it in any way, due to the heavy Sonderkommando use in addition to the employment of the Soviet Trawniki-Manner, almost as disposable as they would have been otherwise likely starved or worked to death in a Wehrmacht-run Russenlager - more humane to them, too, yes).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It wasn't supposed to be more efficient (it wasn't, and which you can compare to the tens of thousands machine gunned in 1 day in the Aktion Erntefest in 1943, following preparations of course), but more humane. In particular more humane for German personnel (who furthermore were barely involved in it in any way, due to the heavy Sonderkommando use in addition to the employment of the Soviet Trawniki-Manner, almost as disposable as they would have been otherwise starved or worked to death in a Wehrmacht-run Russenlager - more humane to them, too, yes).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It wasn't supposed to be more efficient (it wasn't, and which you can compare to the tens of thousands machine gunned in 1 day in the Aktion Ernterfest in 1943, following preparations of course), but more humane. In particular more humane for German personnel (who furthermore were barely involved in it in any way, due to the heavy Sonderkommando use in addition to the employment of the Soviet Trawniki-Manner, almost as disposable as they would have been otherwise starved or worked to death in a Wehrmacht-run Russenlager - more humane to them, too, yes).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It wasn't supposed to be more efficient (it wasn't, and which you can compare to the tens of thousands machine gunned in 1 day in the Aktion Enterfest in 1943, following preparations of course), but more humane. In particular more humane for German personnel (who furthermore were barely involved in it in any way, due to the heavy Sonderkommando use in addition to the employment of the Soviet Trawniki-Manner, almost as disposable as they would have been otherwise starved or worked to death in a Wehrmacht-run Russenlager - more humane to them, too, yes).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It wasn't supposed to be more efficient (it wasn't, and which you can compare to the tens of thousands machine gunned in 1 day in the Aktion Enterfest, following preparations of course), but more humane. In particular more humane for German personnel (who furthermore were barely involved in it in any way, due to the heavy Sonderkommando use in addition to the employment of the Soviet Trawniki-Manner, almost as disposable as they would have been otherwise starved or worked to death in a Wehrmacht-run Russenlager - more humane to them, too, yes).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It wasn't supposed to be more efficient (it wasn't, and which you can compare to the tens of thousands machine gunned in 1 day in the Aktion Enterfest, following preparations of course), but more humane. In particular more humane for German personnel (who furthermore were barely involved in it in any way, due to the heavy Sonderkommando use in addition to the employment of the Trawniki-Manner, almost as disposable as they would have been otherwise starved or worked to death in a Wehrmacht-run Russenlager - more humane to them, too, yes).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It wasn't supposed to be more efficient (it wasn't, and which you can compare to the tens of thousands machine gunned in 1 day in the Aktion Enterfest, following preparations of course), but more humane. In particular more humane for German personnel (who furthermore were barely involved in it in any way, due to the heavy Sonderkommando use in addition to the employment of the Trawniki-Manner, almost as disposable as they would have been otherwise starved or worked to death in a Russenlager - more humane to them, too, yes).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It wasn't supposed to be more efficient (it wasn't, and which you can compare to the tens of thousands machine gunned in 1 day in the Aktion Enterfest, after preparations of course), but more humane. In particular more humane for German personnel (who furthermore were barely involved in it in any way, due to the heavy Sonderkommando use in addition to the employment of the Trawniki-Manner, almost as disposable as they would have been otherwise starved in a Russenlager).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It wasn't supposed to be more efficient (it wasn't, and which you can compare to the tens of thousands machine gunned in 1 day in the Aktion Enterfest, after preparations of course), but more humane. In particular more humane for German personnel (who furthermore were barely involved in it in any way, due to the heavy Sonderkommando use in addition to the employment of the Trawniki-Manner).

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

It wasn't supposed to be more efficient (it wasn't), but more humane. In particular more humane for German personnel (who furthermore were barely involved in it in any way, due to the heavy Sonderkommando use in addition to the employment of the Trawniki-Manner).

3 years ago
1 score