Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

However, I'd still argue that 999/1000 is a vast majority of people who haven't had severe complications (so far).

Except that's the thing we don't know.

How would you know the vast majority have not had complications if media, big tech, and all of the major health authorities are suppressing the data and preventing the general public from knowing?

The 45,000 figure is only what we know from America's Frontline Doctors, and even they don't know if that figure is accurate, since that's only what they have been able to accrue from self-reports.

And that's 45,000 people dead, not people with SAEs, minor AEs, or even budding AEs such as the asymptomatic build-up of clotting. How many of those people are out there?

This goes back to my original point: how exactly DO YOU know that the vast majority haven't had complications if there's a blackout on the data for SAE reporting?

You can say "Well, I know some people who haven't had complications", but that's all anecdotal. They might also be the group where the messengers never got into their bloodstream. You literally don't know.

We do know is that up to April at least 120,000 people on the Facebook group reported SAEs, and Facebook had the group and similar groups banned: https://reclaimthenet.org/facebook-removes-covid-19-vaccine-victims-group/

So that's 120,000 cases between December and April, just in that group alone. But again, due to a black on the data, we don't know the exact extent of the complications or when they even began to occur in those people.

According to Polish and German researchers, they estimated that for every one person the vaccines helped, two people were killed: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693/htm

That paper was quickly attacked by Leftists and pulled, and there have been no follow-up research or investigations to even find out whether the data was accurate. And since no death-tracking is taking place, for all we know the vast majority are encountering SAEs and a small minority are fine.

We literally don't know. That should be everyone's concern: Why are the health authorities censoring the data and preventing people from tracking SAEs/fatalities?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

However, I'd still argue that 999/1000 is a vast majority of people who haven't had severe complications (so far).

Except that's the thing we don't know.

How would you know the vast majority have not had complications if media, big tech, and all of the major health authorities are suppressing the data and preventing the general public from knowing?

The 45,000 figure is only what we know from America's Frontline Doctors, and even they don't know if that figure is accurate, since that's only what they have been able to accrue from self-reports.

This goes back to my original point: how exactly DO YOU know that the vast majority haven't had complications if there's a blackout on the data for SAE reporting?

You can say "Well, I know some people who haven't had complications", but that's all anecdotal. They might also be the group where the messengers never got into their bloodstream. Unless you know the blood work that's been done on them, I don't think it would be wise to really speak on their behalf.

According to Polish and German researchers, they estimated that for every one person the vaccines helped, two people were killed: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693/htm

That paper was quickly attacked by Leftists and pulled, and there have been no follow-up research or investigations to even find out whether the data was accurate. And since no death-tracking is taking place, for all we know the vast majority are encountering SAEs and a small minority are fine.

We literally don't know. That should be everyone's concern: Why are the health authorities censoring the data and preventing people from tracking SAEs/fatalities?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

However, I'd still argue that 999/1000 is a vast majority of people who haven't had severe complications (so far).

Except that's the thing we don't know.

How would you know the vast majority have not had complications if media, big tech, and all of the major health authorities are suppressing the data and preventing the general public from knowing?

The 45,000 figure is only what we know from America's Frontline Doctors, and even they don't know if that figure is accurate, since that's only they have been able to accrue from self-reports.

This goes back to my original point: how exactly DO YOU know that the vast majority haven't had complications if there's a blackout on the data for SAE reporting?

According to Polish and German researchers, they estimated that for every one person the vaccines helped, two people were killed: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693/htm

That paper was quickly attacked by Leftists and pulled, and there have been no follow-up research or investigations to even find out whether the data was accurate. And since no death-tracking is taking place, for all we know the vast majority are encountering SAEs and a small minority are fine.

We literally don't know. That should be everyone's concern: Why are the health authorities censoring the data and preventing people from tracking SAEs/fatalities?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

However, I'd still argue that 999/1000 is a vast majority of people who haven't had severe complications (so far).

Except that's the thing we don't know.

How would you know the vast majority have not had complications if media, big tech, and all of the major health authorities are suppressing the data and preventing the general public from knowing?

The 45,000 figure is only what we know from America's Frontline Doctors, and even they don't know if that figure is accurate, since that's only what figure they have been able to accrue.

According to Polish and German researchers, they estimated that for every one person the vaccines helped, two people were killed: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693/htm

That paper was quickly attacked by Leftists and pulled, and there have been no follow-up research or investigations to even find out whether the data was accurate. And since no death-tracking is taking place, for all we know the vast majority are encountering SAEs and a small minority are fine.

We literally don't know. That should be everyone's concern: Why are the health authorities censoring the data and preventing people from tracking SAEs/fatalities?

3 years ago
1 score