The root cause of all of this is black IQ.

If a university is intended to create functional professional workers, then the cutoff point for "good grades" will always favor whites. Their scores are good enough to indicate proficiency, by which I mean you can safely hire them for almost any job, so their grades will always be considered "good" by the market.

If you switch to a harsher grading system, with "good grades" defined as only the very elite, you will separate the Asian (math and science) and Jewish (verbal) students. White students will be lower, and Hispanic and black students will be lower still. But the people trying to hire good workers will simply aim for whatever minimum proficiency enables reliable workers, and that bar will always coincide with white grades.

How do we know this? Look around the world. White nations are functional, prosperous, wealthy. Whatever minimum IQ threshold is necessary for productivity and stability, whites meet that threshold. Why wouldn't this pattern manifest on a more individual level with respect to employees?

The only way to obscure all of this and protect those protected classes is to destroy the very concept of objective standards. Of course, in a world where grades mean nothing, employers will actually return to using skin color as a proxy for IQ and competency. That's why places like California are skipping to the end and mandating literal quotas. Because equity is like communism; the only way to achieve it is by kneecapping everyone equally.

This is extremely detrimental to the long-term prosperity of black peoples. An objective standard would put positive evolutionary pressure on black peoples, gradually pulling their average IQ towards the other racial demos and eventually achieving something much closer to both equality and equity. But nope.

The root cause of all of this is black IQ.

If a university is intended to create functional professional workers, then the cutoff point for "good grades" will always favor whites. Their scores are good enough to indicate proficiency, by which I mean you can safely hire them for almost any job, so their grades will always be considered "good" by the market.

If you switch to a harsher grading system, with "good grades" defined as only the very elite, you will separate the Asian (math and science) and Jewish (verbal) students. White students will be lower, and Hispanic and black students will be lower still. But the people trying to hire good workers will simply aim for whatever minimum proficiency enables reliable workers, and that bar will always coincide with white grades.

How do we know this? Look around the world. White nations are functional, prosperous, wealthy. Whatever minimum IQ threshold is necessary for productivity and stability, whites meet that threshold. Why wouldn't this pattern manifest on a more individual level with respect to employees?

The only way to obscure all of this and protect those protected classes is to destroy the very concept of objective standards. Of course, in a world where grades mean nothing, employers will actually return to using skin color as a proxy for IQ and competency. That's why places like California are skipping to the end and mandating literal quotas. Because equity is like communism; the only way to achieve it is by kneecapping everyone equally.