None of which happened by opening with "women are evil and we have no hope for the future, there is no solution."

Right but, this discourse we're having right now...

Maybe I'm wrong about this, but my perception is that you're defending Roosh's judeochristian advocacy.

Now... I may be a Quaker heathen who thinks there's about ten-ish pages in the bible that actually matter, but even I know that abrahamic religions pretty squarely say straight out that yes, women are evil (and it's pretty much just my tiny little sect that is in the minority saying no they're not).

None of which happened by opening with "women are evil and we have no hope for the future, there is no solution."

Right but, this discourse we're having right now...

Maybe I'm wrong about this, but my perception is that you're defending Roosh's judeochristian advocacy.

Now... I may be a Quaker heathen who thinks there's about ten-ish pages in the bible that actually matter, but even I know that abrahamic religions pretty squarely say straight out that yes, women are evil (and it's pretty much just my tiny little sect that is in the minority saying no they're not and also those pages are allegorical).

None of which happened by opening with "women are evil and we have no hope for the future, there is no solution."

Right but, this discourse we're having right now...

Maybe I'm wrong about this, but my perception is that you're defending Roosh's judeochristian advocacy.

Now... I may be a Quaker heathen who thinks there's about ten-ish pages in the bible that actually matter, but even I know that abrahamic religions pretty squarely say straight out that yes, women are evil (and it's pretty much just my tiny little sect that is in the minority saying those pages don't matter).