Thing is, I don't think she's exactly wrong in her assessment, but not for the reasons she thinks. The ideology absolutely needs a boogeyman to pathologize, and it's easiest to do that with an acceptable target rather than ones society has been conditioned to recoil against when pathologized (e.g., Jews).

Even if it wasn't anti-white, it's very clearly being used by other racial supremacist groups to undermine society. It's rather asinine to pretend otherwise simply because it's a tool used to that end.

Thing is, I don't think she's exactly wrong in her assessment, but not for the reasons she thinks. The ideology absolutely needs a boogeyman to pathologize, and it's easiest to do that with an acceptable target rather than ones society has been conditioned to recoil reflexively (e.g., Jews).

Even if it wasn't anti-white, it's very clearly being used by other racial supremacist groups to undermine society. It's rather asinine to pretend otherwise simply because it's a tool used to that end.

Thing is, I don't think she's exactly wrong in her assessment, but not for the reasons she thinks. The ideology absolutely needs a boogeyman to pathologize, and it's easiest to do that with an acceptable target rather than ones society has been conditioned to recoil out (e.g., Jews).

Even if it wasn't anti-white, it's very clearly being used by other racial supremacist groups to undermine society. It's rather asinine to pretend otherwise simply because it's a tool used to that end.