Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: Missed words "rapidly reduced"

I mean, I very much feel sorry for many of the individuals who get caught up in this shit, but at the same time it's interesting to think about the evolutionary impact.

There has never, ever, been a time in recorded or known human history when non-heterosexuality has been so accepted (promoted) nor when being transgender was so accepted (promoted) along with surgeries that cause sterilization (maybe hijra in India).

Think about how many LG(not b)T people will not reproduce now vs 100 years ago when many tried to "pass" or were repressed.

This could be one of the largest evolutionary shifts based on voluntarily sexual selection that's ever occurred.

If there truly is a large genetic component to being LGBT, the LGBT population could be dramatically and rapidly reduced if LGBT people stop having so many kids. If it's mostly environmental, mostly choice, etc., not so big an impact.

3 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original

I mean, I very much feel sorry for many of the individuals who get caught up in this shit, but at the same time it's interesting to think about the evolutionary impact.

There has never, ever, been a time in recorded or known human history when non-heterosexuality has been so accepted (promoted) nor when being transgender was so accepted (promoted) along with surgeries that cause sterilization (maybe hijra in India).

Think about how many LG(not b)T people will not reproduce now vs 100 years ago when many tried to "pass" or were repressed.

This could be one of the largest evolutionary shifts based on voluntarily sexual selection that's ever occurred.

If there truly is a large genetic component to being LGBT, the LGBT population could be dramatically if LGBT people stop having so many kids. If it's mostly environmental, mostly choice, etc., not so big an impact.

3 years ago
1 score