The claim that red states have no standing when blue states break their own election laws - in a federal election that decides a president who sets policy for the entire nation - is retarded on its face. Of course red states have standing. They are subject to the outcome of the election, same as every other state. If blue states broke their own laws and illegally decided the election, exactly which court should resolve such a dispute?

The claim that red states have no standing when blue states break their own election laws - in a federal election that decides a president who sets policy for the entire nation - is retarded on its face.