Humans have always been the hunter-killer ape. It's just been shown that they've been hunters for at least 2 million years. It's also been shown that chimps and gorillas hunt, too, though not as often, and not in as organized a fashion as Man does.

The modern Savannah chimp uses spears to poke small prey to death/injury; it's mostly the females who use them to get bushbabies out of tree hollows, probably because they're weaker. But across all the different populations and cultures of chimp, they tend to hunt individually, or in small groups, and are probably mostly opportunitstic (though it would seem the Savannah chimps are more active, because you have to hunt more actively out on the grassland than you do a jungle).

Early human-line apes were probably distinguishable from other chimps by, well, adapting completely to its grassland lifestyle by walking upright more often (see the gif of the raccoon absconding with cat food on two legs, now imagine a chimp doing that, running with food to the safety of the treeline before the lions get him.) And they probably hunted in larger groups, which allowed them to hunt larger animals, which made the human chimp an active predator of large species as his technology and techniques improved. At the very least, they likely would have hunted baby elephants the same way North American wolves maneouvered the herds of Plains Bison, which would have presented real problems when Man met the hairy Eurasian/American elephants (which would have been valuable for warm fur and shelter building parts as well as meat) ....

The ice age megafauna didn't have a chance in the face of a spreading technological hunter-killer ape that hunted in groups larger than, say, 5 or 10, and then, 45,000 years ago, figured out how to partner up with their main competitors (not predators), the wolf, to hunt and mutually protect one another from their mutual predators, the large cats and bears.

As far as milk and cheese goes, well, lactose intolerance has nothing to do with race. Or even species.

Milk is a more or less unique thing of the Class Mammalia (let's ignore pigeons and other oddballs for now.) Mammals don't "bake" their kids for quite as long as the other classes do, so their digestive systems aren't as mature as they could be when they're born. So our bodies make food for them. Now, when one gets to a certain age where their teeth are in as an indication of their digestive system getting a bit more robust, we're supposed to start eating our own food, without ever looking back to mama's milk.

Once you stop drinking milk, that's where lactose intolerance starts.

So if you don't adopt the cultural habit of continuing to drink milk of some kind well after the Age of Weaning, of course, you're going to be "lactose intolerant" as an adult. It's supposed to happen.

This is where myths about giving your dog and cat milk come from. No, it doesn't give them "worms." If it did, it'd give YOU worms, too. And no, it doesn't "give" them the runs, unless you failed to give them milk and cheese once a week or so to stop them from becoming lactose intolerant, ya goob.

The sad thing is, these vegan activists who want to keep believing that apes are naturally just leaf-and-fruit eaters, are also the same people who deny that humans had anything to do with the extinction of the recently-deceased megafauna. "It was climate change!" Well, there was more than one ice and and interstitial, and most of these creatures had survived more than one; and if climate change was responsible for anything, it was responsible for making Man, by drying up his jungles and forcing him to adapt to grassland and improve his technology or die in the first place.

Humans have always been the hunter-killer ape. It's just been shown that they've been hunters for at least 2 million years. It's also been shown that chimps and gorillas hunt, too, though not as often, and not in as organized a fashion as Man does.

The modern Savannah chimp uses spears to poke small prey to death/injury; it's mostly the females who use them to get bushbabies out of tree hollows, probably because they're weaker. But across all the different populations and cultures of chimp, they tend to hunt individually, or in small groups, and are probably mostly opportunitstic (though it would seem the Savannah chimps are more active, because you have to hunt more actively out on the grassland than you do a jungle).

Early human-line apes were probably distinguishable from other chimps by, well, adapting completely to its grassland lifestyle by walking upright more often (see the gif of the raccoon absconding with cat food on two legs, now imagine a chimp doing that, running with food to the safety of the treeline before the lions get him.) And they probably hunted in larger groups, which allowed them to hunt larger animals, which made the human chimp an active predator of large species as his technology and techniques improved. At the very least, they likely would have hunted baby elephants the same way North American wolves maneouvered the herds of Plains Bison, which would have presented real problems when Man met the hairy Eurasian/American elephants (which would have been valuable for warm fur and shelter building parts as well as meat, and fat for fire) ....

The ice age megafauna didn't have a chance in the face of a spreading technological hunter-killer ape that hunted in groups larger than, say, 5 or 10, and then, 45,000 years ago, figured out how to partner up with their main competitors (not predators), the wolf, to hunt and mutually protect one another from their mutual predators, the large cats and bears.

As far as milk and cheese goes, well, lactose intolerance has nothing to do with race. Or even species.

Milk is a more or less unique thing of the Class Mammalia (let's ignore pigeons and other oddballs for now.) Mammals don't "bake" their kids for quite as long as the other classes do, so their digestive systems aren't as mature as they could be when they're born. So our bodies make food for them. Now, when one gets to a certain age where their teeth are in as an indication of their digestive system getting a bit more robust, we're supposed to start eating our own food, without ever looking back to mama's milk.

Once you stop drinking milk, that's where lactose intolerance starts.

So if you don't adopt the cultural habit of continuing to drink milk of some kind well after the Age of Weaning, of course, you're going to be "lactose intolerant" as an adult. It's supposed to happen.

This is where myths about giving your dog and cat milk come from. No, it doesn't give them "worms." If it did, it'd give YOU worms, too. And no, it doesn't "give" them the runs, unless you failed to give them milk and cheese once a week or so to stop them from becoming lactose intolerant, ya goob.

The sad thing is, these vegan activists who want to keep believing that apes are naturally just leaf-and-fruit eaters, are also the same people who deny that humans had anything to do with the extinction of the recently-deceased megafauna.

Humans have always been the hunter-killer ape. It's just been shown that they've been hunters for at least 2 million years. It's also been shown that chimps and gorillas hunt, too, though not as often, and not in as organized a fashion as Man does.

The modern Savannah chimp uses spears to poke small prey to death/injury; it's mostly the females who use them to get bushbabies out of tree hollows, probably because they're weaker. But across all the different populations and cultures of chimp, they tend to hunt individually, or in small groups, and are probably mostly opportunitstic (though it would seem the Savannah chimps are more active, because you have to hunt more actively out on the grassland than you do a jungle).

Early human-line apes were probably distinguishable from other chimps by, well, adapting completely to its grassland lifestyle by walking upright more often (see the gif of the raccoon absconding with cat food on two legs, now imagine a chimp doing that, running with food to the safety of the treeline before the lions get him.) And they probably hunted in larger groups, which allowed them to hunt larger animals, which made the human chimp an active predator of large species as his technology and techniques improved. At the very least, they likely would have hunted baby elephants the same way North American wolves maneouvered the herds of Plains Bison, which would have presented real problems when Man met the hairy Eurasian/American elephants (which would have been valuable for warm fur and shelter building parts as well as meat) ....

The ice age megafauna didn't have a chance in the face of a spreading technological hunter-killer ape that hunted in groups larger than, say, 5 or 10, and then, 45,000 years ago, figured out how to partner up with their main competitors (not predators), the wolf, to hunt and mutually protect one another from their mutual predators, the large cats and bears.

As far as milk and cheese goes, well, lactose intolerance has nothing to do with race. Or even species.

Milk is a more or less unique thing of the Class Mammalia (let's ignore pigeons and other oddballs for now.) Mammals don't "bake" their kids for quite as long as the other classes do, so their digestive systems aren't as mature as they could be when they're born. So our bodies make food for them. Now, when one gets to a certain age where their teeth are in as an indication of their digestive system getting a bit more robust, we're supposed to start eating our own food, without ever looking back to mama's milk.

Once you stop drinking milk, that's where lactose intolerance starts.

So if you don't adopt the cultural habit of continuing to drink milk of some kind well after the Age of Weaning, of course, you're going to be "lactose intolerant" as an adult. It's supposed to happen.

This is where myths about giving your dog and cat milk come from. No, it doesn't give them "worms." If it did, it'd give YOU worms, too. And no, it doesn't "give" them the runs, unless you failed to give them milk and cheese once a week or so to stop them from becoming lactose intolerant, ya goob.

The sad thing is, these vegan activists who want to keep believing that apes are naturally just leaf-and-fruit eaters, are also the same people who deny that humans had anything to do with the extinction of the recently-deceased megafauna.

Humans have always been the hunter-killer ape. It's just been shown that they've been hunters for at least 2 million years. It's also been shown that chimps and gorillas hunt, too, though not as often, and not in as organized a fashion as Man does.

The modern Savannah chimp uses spears to poke small prey to death/injury; it's mostly the females who use them to get bushbabies out of tree hollows, probably because they're weaker. But across all the different populations and cultures of chimp, they tend to hunt individually, or in small groups, and are probably mostly opportunitstic (though it would seem the Savannah chimps are more active, because you have to hunt more actively out on the grassland than you do a jungle).

Early human-line apes were probably distinguishable from other chimps by, well, adapting completely to its grassland lifestyle by walking upright more often (see the gif of the raccoon absconding with cat food on two legs, now imagine a chimp doing that, running with food to the safety of the treeline before the lions get him.) And they probably hunted in larger groups, which allowed them to hunt larger animals, which made the human chimp an active predator of large species as his technology and techniques improved. At the very least, they likely would have hunted baby elephants the same way North American wolves maneouvered the herds of Plains Bison, which would have presented real problems when Man met the hairy Eurasian/American elephants ....

The ice age megafauna didn't have a chance in the face of a spreading technological hunter-killer ape that hunted in groups larger than, say, 5 or 10, and then, 45,000 years ago, figured out how to partner up with their main competitors (not predators), the wolf, to hunt and mutually protect one another from their mutual predators, the large cats and bears.

As far as milk and cheese goes, well, lactose intolerance has nothing to do with race. Or even species.

Milk is a more or less unique thing of the Class Mammalia (let's ignore pigeons and other oddballs for now.) Mammals don't "bake" their kids for quite as long as the other classes do, so their digestive systems aren't as mature as they could be when they're born. So our bodies make food for them. Now, when one gets to a certain age where their teeth are in as an indication of their digestive system getting a bit more robust, we're supposed to start eating our own food, without ever looking back to mama's milk.

Once you stop drinking milk, that's where lactose intolerance starts.

So if you don't adopt the cultural habit of continuing to drink milk of some kind well after the Age of Weaning, of course, you're going to be "lactose intolerant" as an adult. It's supposed to happen.

This is where myths about giving your dog and cat milk come from. No, it doesn't give them "worms." If it did, it'd give YOU worms, too. And no, it doesn't "give" them the runs, unless you failed to give them milk and cheese once a week or so to stop them from becoming lactose intolerant, ya goob.

The sad thing is, these vegan activists who want to keep believing that apes are naturally just leaf-and-fruit eaters, are also the same people who deny that humans had anything to do with the extinction of the recently-deceased megafauna.

Humans have always been the hunter-killer ape. It's just been shown that they've been hunters for at least 2 million years. It's also been shown that chimps and gorillas hunt, too, though not as often, and not in as organized a fashion as Man does.

The modern Savannah chimp uses spears to poke small prey to death/injury; it's mostly the females who use them to get bushbabies out of tree hollows, probably because they're weaker. But across all the different populations and cultures of chimp, they tend to hunt individually, or in small groups, and are probably mostly opportunitstic (though it would seem the Savannah chimps are more active, because you have to hunt more actively out on the grassland than you do a jungle).

Early human-line apes were probably distinguishable from other chimps by, well, adapting completely to its grassland lifestyle by walking upright more often (see the gif of the raccoon absconding with cat food on two legs, now imagine a chimp doing that, running with food to the safety of the treeline before the lions get him.) And they probably hunted in larger groups, which allowed them to hunt larger animals, which made the human chimp an active predator of large species as his technology and techniques improved.

The ice age megafauna didn't have a chance in the face of a spreading technological hunter-killer ape that hunted in groups larger than, say, 5 or 10, and then, 45,000 years ago, figured out how to partner up with their main competitors (not predators), the wolf, to hunt and mutually protect one another from their mutual predators, the large cats and bears.

As far as milk and cheese goes, well, lactose intolerance has nothing to do with race. Or even species.

Milk is a more or less unique thing of the Class Mammalia (let's ignore pigeons and other oddballs for now.) Mammals don't "bake" their kids for quite as long as the other classes do, so their digestive systems aren't as mature as they could be when they're born. So our bodies make food for them. Now, when one gets to a certain age where their teeth are in as an indication of their digestive system getting a bit more robust, we're supposed to start eating our own food, without ever looking back to mama's milk.

Once you stop drinking milk, that's where lactose intolerance starts.

So if you don't adopt the cultural habit of continuing to drink milk of some kind well after the Age of Weaning, of course, you're going to be "lactose intolerant" as an adult. It's supposed to happen.

This is where myths about giving your dog and cat milk come from. No, it doesn't give them "worms." If it did, it'd give YOU worms, too. And no, it doesn't "give" them the runs, unless you failed to give them milk and cheese once a week or so to stop them from becoming lactose intolerant, ya goob.

The sad thing is, these vegan activists who want to keep believing that apes are naturally just leaf-and-fruit eaters, are also the same people who deny that humans had anything to do with the extinction of the recently-deceased megafauna.

Humans have always been the hunter-killer ape. It's just been shown that they've been hunters for at least 2 million years. It's also been shown that chimps and gorillas hunt, too, though not as often, and not in as organized a fashion as Man does.

The modern Savannah chimp uses spears to poke small prey to death/injury; it's mostly the females who use them to get bushbabies out of tree hollows, probably because they're weaker. But across all the different populations and cultures of chimp, they tend to hunt individually, or in small groups, and are probably mostly opportunitstic (though it would seem the Savannah chimps are more active, because you have to hunt more actively out on the grassland than you do a jungle).

Early human-line apes were probably distinguishable from other chimps by, well, adapting completely to its grassland lifestyle by walking upright more often (see the gif of the raccoon absconding with cat food on two legs, now imagine a chimp doing that, running with food to the safety of the treeline before the lions get him.) And they probably hunted in larger groups, which allowed them to hunt larger animals, which made the human chimp an active predator of large species as his technology and techniques improved.

The ice age megafauna didn't have a chance in the face of a spreading technological hunter-killer ape that hunted in groups larger than, say, 5 or 10, and then, 45,000 years ago, figured out how to partner up with their main competitors (not predators), the wolf, to hunt and mutually protect one another from their mutual predators, the large cats and bears.

As far as milk and cheese goes, well, lactose intolerance has nothing to do with race. Or even species.

Milk is a more or less unique thing of the Class Mammalia (let's ignore pigeons and other oddballs for now.) Mammals don't "bake" their kids for quite as long as the other classes do, so their digestive systems aren't as mature as they could be when they're born. So our bodies make food for them. Now, when one gets to a certain age where their teeth are in as an indication of their digestive system getting a bit more robust, we're supposed to start eating our own food, without ever looking back to mama's milk.

Once you stop drinking milk, that's where lactose intolerance starts.

So if you don't adopt the cultural habit of continuing to drink milk of some kind well after the Age of Weaning, of course, you're going to be "lactose intolerant" as an adult. It's supposed to happen.

This is where myths about giving your dog and cat milk come from. No, it doesn't give them "worms." If it did, it'd give YOU worms, too. And no, it doesn't "give" them the runs, unless you failed to give them milk and cheese once a week or so to stop them from becoming lactose intolerant, ya goob.