Poor women have always worked. But for the past 1,000 years, the stuff that women did as cottage industries got transferred to men mostly because of the shit-nasty technology that got introduced (the "industrial revolution" really started with the invention of the cam, which enabled wind and water mills, and thus powered weaver's looms and things like that.) Up until the late 20th century/this century, a lot of technology was either too heavy or too dangerous and plain old not interesting to a lot of women who like their fingers and such. But now that technology is getting properly advanced, even non-humans are starting to use some of it, it's become that easy ... Cripes, just look at the evolution of the car. It's next to impossible for a small, weak person to crank one up, and control it with NO automatic steering or brakes, but something more modern? Pshaw, they taught rats to drive little cars.

That "no wife of mine will ever work outside of the home" of 1950s television? Besides it being filtered through the eyes of the same .. kind of people ... that write this shit today, is kind of misrepresented now; it was a thing for men of those older generations to have a wife that didn't work because it made him look like he had a job good enough to support a family without having to rely on his wife. A man with a wife who worked for money (whether outside of the house, as, say, a typist or waitress, or took in laundry or babysitting) looked like a bum, or a guy with a shit job. Uh, just how much DOES an "orchestra leader" make, Ricky? About as much as a busboy?

A man who relied on his woman for money was nothin' but a dirty ol' Hound Dog (see: Big Mama Thornton).

A well-off man's wife didn't work for money. If she did get bored and needed something to do outside the home, she did volunteer work.

The problem with modern so-called "feminism" is that by the 1990s, they started taking away the choice of women to be full-time moms/housewives, whether they really had to work or not .. while still lionizing the so-called "choice" of being a fucking pos whore. Now we're EXPECTED to work, whether we fucking want to or not. We're at least expected to come with our own income now, at least.

Poor women have always worked. But for the past 1,000 years, the stuff that women did as cottage industries got transferred to men mostly because of the shit-nasty technology that got introduced (the "industrial revolution" really started with the invention of the cam, which enabled wind and water mills, and thus powered weaver's looms and things like that.) Up until the late 20th century/this century, a lot of technology was either too heavy or too dangerous and plain old not interesting to a lot of women who like their fingers and such. But now that technology is getting properly advanced, even non-humans are starting to use some of it, it's become that easy ... Cripes, just look at the evolution of the car. It's next to impossible for a small, weak person to crank one up, and control it with NO automatic steering or brakes, but something more modern? Pshaw, they taught rats to drive little cars.

That "no wife of mine will ever work outside of the home" of 1950s television? Besides it being filtered through the eyes of the same .. kind of people ... that write this shit today, is kind of misrepresented now; it was a thing for men of those older generations to have a wife that didn't work because it made him look like he had a job good enough to support a family without having to rely on his wife. A man with a wife who worked for money (whether outside of the house, as, say, a typist or waitress, or took in laundry or babysitting) looked like a bum, or a guy with a shit job. Uh, just how much DOES an "orchestra leader" make, Ricky? About as much as a busboy?

A well-off man's wife didn't work for money. If she did get bored and needed something to do outside the home, she did volunteer work.

The problem with modern so-called "feminism" is that by the 1990s, they started taking away the choice of women to be full-time moms/housewives, whether they really had to work or not .. while still lionizing the so-called "choice" of being a fucking pos whore. Now we're EXPECTED to work, whether we fucking want to or not. We're at least expected to come with our own income now, at least.

Poor women have always worked. But for the past 1,000 years, the stuff that women did as cottage industries got transferred to men mostly because of the shit-nasty technology that got introduced (the "industrial revolution" really started with the invention of the cam, which enabled wind and water mills, and thus powered weaver's looms and things like that.) Up until the late 20th century/this century, a lot of technology was either too heavy or too dangerous and plain old not interesting to a lot of women who like their fingers and such. But now that technology is getting properly advanced, even non-humans are starting to use some of it, it's become that easy ...

That "no wife of mine will ever work outside of the home" of 1950s television? Besides it being filtered through the eyes of the same .. kind of people ... that write this shit today, is kind of misrepresented now; it was a thing for men of those older generations to have a wife that didn't work because it made him look like he had a job good enough to support a family without having to rely on his wife. A man with a wife who worked for money (whether outside of the house, as, say, a typist or waitress, or took in laundry or babysitting) looked like a bum, or a guy with a shit job. Uh, just how much DOES an "orchestra leader" make, Ricky? About as much as a busboy?

A well-off man's wife didn't work for money. If she did get bored and needed something to do outside the home, she did volunteer work.

The problem with modern so-called "feminism" is that by the 1990s, they started taking away the choice of women to be full-time moms/housewives, whether they really had to work or not .. while still lionizing the so-called "choice" of being a fucking pos whore. Now we're EXPECTED to work, whether we fucking want to or not. We're at least expected to come with our own income now, at least.