They've been stating for a year now that if someone tests positive with an oversensitive (too many cycles) PCR test (for fragments of Sars Cov 2), then that person has Covid-19 (the disease). They may only have leftover fragments from when the body defeated it months ago, but doesn't matter. If that person dies of any reason (after testing positive) that person died of Covid-19 (the disease). This includes intentional and unintentional injuries, such as a car crash, and being shot.

The same criteria that applies to deaths that have any relation to virus should apply to deaths that have any relation to the vaccine.

Ideally there would be actual science, rather than manipulations for fear mongering, so people know about the actual risks and can make informed decisions. Instead we're in a situation where the dangers of one side is played up to the moon, while the other is downplayed to the core or the earth.

--

For actual science: This is the CDC's system to report adverse reactions with vaccines: https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html You can find videos of how to to use it online (on alternative video platforms) to find information on Sars2 vaccine reactions. This isn't all adverse reactions in the US, only what is reported to the system, which may be a small percentage of the total number.

This is the CDC's weekly report / breakdown of Sars2 related deaths: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm Broken down into demographics, and totals of different comorbidities.

CDC's garbage in many important ways, but these are more external stats.

They've been stating for a year now that if someone tests positive with an oversensitive (too many cycles) PCR test (for fragments of Sars Cov 2), then that person has Covid-19 (the disease). They may only have leftover fragments from when the body defeated it months ago, but doesn't matter. If that person dies of any reason (after testing positive) that person died of Covid-19 (the disease). This includes intentional and unintentional injuries, such as a car crash, and being shot.

The same criteria that applies to deaths that have any relation to virus should apply to deaths that have any relation to the vaccine.

Ideally there would be actual science, rather than manipulations for fear mongering, so people know about the actual risks and can make informed decisions. Instead we're in a situation where the dangers of one side is played up to the moon, while the other is downplayed to the core or the earth.

-- For actual science: This is the CDC's system to report adverse reactions with vaccines: https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html You can find videos of how to to use it online (on alternative video platforms) to find information on Sars2 vaccine reactions. This isn't all adverse reactions in the US, only what is reported to the system, which may be a small percentage of the total number.

This is the CDC's weekly report / breakdown of Sars2 related deaths: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm Broken down into demographics, and totals of different comorbidities.

CDC's garbage in many important ways, but these are more external stats.

They've been stating for a year now that if someone tests positive with an oversensitive (too many cycles) PCR test (for fragments of Sars Cov 2), then that person has Covid-19 (the disease). They may only have leftover fragments from when the body defeated it months ago, but doesn't matter. If that person dies of any reason (after testing positive) that person died of Covid-19 (the disease). This includes intentional and unintentional injuries, such as a car crash, and being shot.

The same criteria that applies to deaths that have any relation to virus should apply to deaths that have any relation to the vaccine.

Ideally there would be actual science, rather than manipulations for fear mongering, so people know about the actual risks and can make informed decisions. Instead we're in a situation where the dangers of one side is played up to the moon, while the other is downplayed to the core or the earth.

For actual science: This is the CDC's system to report adverse reactions with vaccines: https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html You can find videos of how to to use it online (on alternative video platforms) to find information on Sars2 vaccine reactions. This isn't all adverse reactions in the US, only what is reported to the system, which may be a small percentage of the total number.

This is the CDC's weekly report / breakdown of Sars2 related deaths: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm Broken down into demographics, and totals of different comorbidities.

CDC's garbage in many important ways, but these are more external stats.

They've been stating for a year now that if someone tests positive with an oversensitive (too many cycles) PCR test (for fragments of Sars Cov 2), then that person has Covid-19 (the disease). They may only have leftover fragments from when the body defeated it months ago, but doesn't matter. If that person dies of any reason (after testing positive) that person died of Covid-19 (the disease). This includes intentional and unintentional injuries, such as a car crash, and being shot.

The same criteria that applies to deaths that have any relation to virus should apply to deaths that have any relation to the vaccine.

Ideally there would be actual science, rather than manipulations for fear mongering, so people know about the actual risks and can make informed decisions. Instead we're in a situation where the dangers of one side is played up to the moon, while the other is downplayed to the core or the earth.

--

For actual science: This is the CDC's system to report adverse reactions with vaccines: https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html You can find videos of how to to use it online (on alternative video platforms) to find information on Sars2 vaccine reactions.

This is the CDC's weekly report / breakdown of Sars2 related deaths: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm Broken down into demographics, and totals of different comorbidities.

CDC's garbage in many important ways, but these are more external stats.