As much as I'm not a Fuentes fan and having an appreciation for IP's work:
This was embarrassing. They did not really attack what was said, they just dismissed what was said. It was a 3 on 1 but worse than that because they were reacting to a recording. Even with those odds in their favor, they still face-planted.
Its a resource exhaustion tactic. It takes ten lines of real effort to substantially disprove one line of made up accusation, so they just hammer you at a 10:1 ratio until you're exhausted or have other things to do and bow out. Then they claim that means they won, and by extension whatever they were saying about you was true.
As much as I'm not a Fuentes fan and having an appreciation for IP's work:
This was embarrassing. They did not really attack what was said, they just dismissed what was said. It was a 3 on 1 but worse than that because they were reacting to a recording. Even with those odds in their favor, they still face-planted.
Its a resource exhaustion tactic. It takes ten lines of real effort to substantially disprove one line of made up accusation, so they just hammer you at a 10:1 ratio until you're exhausted or have other things to do and bow out. Then they claim that means they won, and by extension whatever they were saying about you was true.
Ah yes, the chess playing seagull approach, swoop in, knock the pieces over, make a racket, shit all over the board and strut off like it's a victory