“The witnesses say … that shortly after you arrived at the party, you left and came back shortly thereafter,” Amador said. “And you told [a friend], ‘I just had sex.’ ... You didn’t appear unhappy. You appeared to be having fun and that the encounter on the side of the house with Matt, suspect Araiza, was consensual."
Amador also explained to the girl that additional witness testimony alleged that at this period of time, “you were approaching men at the party saying, ‘I want you to [expletive] me and if you don’t [expletive] me you’re a [expletive].”
While the civil lawsuit claimed that right after the Araiza encounter in the side yard the football player led her into the bedroom in the house, the timeline established by authorities was much different. Prosecutors said that “shortly after” being with Araiza, witnesses said the girl again left her group and came back to report she had had sex with a different man. Again, prosecutors explained, witnesses suggested it was consensual.
“You had returned and then came back and said you had sex with a guy, this would have been the second person that would have been in the progression of the evening,” Amador said. “Again, you’re described as being OK, not scared or distraught. Seemed happy, seemed consensual.
Good night lol. I’ve always said “I blacked out” is college code for “I’m not proud of how I behaved last night.” Now I know “I WAS RAPED OMG PLZ WRECK A MAN’S LIFE AND MAKE HIM LOSE HIS PRO SPORTS CONTRACT” is high school code for, and I’m quoting here… “I had sex.”
Good night lol. I’ve always said “I blacked out” is college code for “I’m not proud of how I behaved last night.” Now I know “I WAS RAPED OMG PLZ WRECK A MAN’S LIFE AND MAKE HIM LOSE HIS PRO SPORTS CONTRACT” is high school code for, and I’m quoting here… “I had sex.”