It's diabolically brilliant in its simplicity.
And I'm not talking about the twitter drones who vomit up the talking points as easily as they say orange man bad. Those people are little more than bobble heads that manage speech somehow.
No, I'm talking about the thought leaders.
As long as the person is doing what they want and is given accolades and public opinion is in their favor, they can sing the 'woman's' favor and call people critical of them misogynist and buzzword, buzzword, buzzword.
The minute that 'woman' fucks up or steps outside the plantation, BAM! They're a man again, and it's all the fault of the patriarchy.
It's basically win-win. They can play the girl-power card when they're up and patriarchy poker when their down.
No, the later waves of feminism are all marxist. Their goal is to destroy the family (plus all other communities that may compete with the government's authority).
What better way to have children be rejected by their parents than to make them join the LGBT+, embrace promiscuous and interracial sex, hate white men (their dad), do drugs, get tatoos and pink hair, etc. When the child has antagonised his family, the cult becomes his only group.
Marxists worship the government as a god, quite litterally. All that is not the government must be destroyed.
Not exactly.
Picture a Venn Diagram. On one side, you've got a circle that's people obsessed with equality to the point of making people equality miserable so long as they're equal. On the other, you have a group of upper and upper middle class trust-funders who have never accomplished anything and feel guilty for the wealth they enjoy but didn't earn. nine out of ten marxists fall comfortably into the sliver between those two circles.
Hell, you look at Marx's life, and you realize why this shit appeals to them, it's because the bastard was one of them in every way imaginable, down to never working a hard day's labor in his life.