I tried answering you in the other thread and got no response, but okay, I'll try one more time. Minus the assumption of good faith this time.
First is definition. If you wanted a serious discussion, you wouldn't ignore requests for it. Honestly really incriminating, considering the language games most of us are familiar with from sjws. But that's okay, I'll use the broadest definition I can think of: illustrations of females.
Next, since we're engaged in a discussion of the broadest generalities, I'll remove a large chunk with broad generalities befitting the refusal to define terms: any singular image without narrative context can be enjoyed for craftsmanship or illustrative style.
The little interest possible now falls to images that bear narrative context. Broadly: metaphorical value, asthetic value, crude tonal display, and expression of incentive from another character's point of view.
I tried answering you in the other thread and got no response, but okay, I'll try one more time. Minus the assumption of good faith this time.
First is definition. If you wanted a serious discussion, you wouldn't ignore requests for it. Honestly really incriminating, considering the language games most of us are familiar with from sjws. But that's okay, I'll use the broadest definition I can think of: illustrations of females.
Next, since we're engaged in a discussion of the broadest generalities, I'll remove a large chunk with broad generalities befitting the refusal to define terms: any singular image without narrative context can be enjoyed for craftsmanship or illustrative style.
The little interest possible now falls to images that bear narrative context. Broadly: metaphorical value, asthetic value, crude tonal display, and expression of incentive from another character's point of view.