18
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 18 points ago +18 / -0

Council member Ava added that they were told that "without context, our image could be taken the wrong way," suggesting that it could be interpreted as a promotion of white supremacy. She said that councilors were told to be "mindful that the image, despite it not being problematic, is something that could grow to be controversial."

And there is the implied threat.

1
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 1 point ago +2 / -1

He cited Critical Drinker's sounder for (((The Message))) so I provided some helpful typographical assistance.
And also one of my favorite Critical Drinker-isms.

12
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 12 points ago +13 / -1

You can put the "echo effect" as (((The Agenda))).

Are there other ways to do it?

Doon't Knoo!

1
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I didn't know that was bad. Was that bad?"

I know it was probably set up, but:

That's how you get killed. Here's hoping some day.

5
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 5 points ago +5 / -0

There will NEVER be evidence of it, and even if there is, do you think the ideologically captured leftist media will report it? How naive if so.

3
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is when you are sexually attracted to the Allosaurus.
(People who are allosexual do not get a lot of action.)

4
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 4 points ago +4 / -0

It was so bad I bet you most people don't even remember who the fuck he ran against.

Pretty sure that was McCain in '08 (which I did forget) and Mittens in '12 (which I didn't, but wished I did).

4
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sure, Princess Mary Poppins...

2
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Peter Gibbons? Yeaaaaahhhhh I'm gonna need you to some in on Saturday, m'kay?

8
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 8 points ago +8 / -0

Should we denounce or start dousing leftist with liquids?

Why can't it be both?

2
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's like throwing a hot dog down a hallway

3
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 3 points ago +3 / -0

1 charge, 33 carbon copies of the same charge.

1
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 1 point ago +1 / -0

will give them obscene ammo to talk about the corruption

I think we are beyond talking t this point. But your description of this providing ammo may be apt.

3
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 3 points ago +3 / -0

One count and 33 variations of the same.

5
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, not 34 different felonies. They took one instance of bookkeeping and charged him for every step in the bookkeeping process.
-Logged the bank transaction? That's a charge.
-Transferred the money from one G/L account to another? That's a charge.
-Funds logged into a bank account? That's a charge.
etc etc.

4
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is barely scratching the surface. There will be libraries written about all of the nonsense surrounding the case.

I disagree. Nothing about this case will be in literature, except to say "WE GOT HIM!".

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” -Orwell

1
I_Bent_My_Wookiee 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will claim that because he was convicted of a federal felony, he cannot be on the ballot.

view more: Next ›