12
Graphenium 12 points ago +12 / -0

This. Handshakes should be 100% ignored for the time being, there is an obvious and coordinated effort to slide this forum identically to how the exact same person(s) did it to ConPro.

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Meh, nothing stops them from sitting on their fleet of accounts for X days before running their upvote circlejerk operation. Having lived through the death of ConPro, there is basically nothing you can do that can’t be countered, outside of a quality and uncompromised mod (team, but that gets harder still)

12
Graphenium 12 points ago +12 / -0

I can't fucking wait for the economy collapse because they're all going to leave once there's no money to be had.

Lol, that’s a funny way of spelling “become cannibals”

5
Graphenium 5 points ago +5 / -0

While true, it would remain inherently flawed in that brand new shill accounts can just upvote eachother in random dead communities anyway, rendering score filters ultimately pointless... So I use a score filter and an account age filter on my communities and checking the logs indicate they cover the majority of attempts; though they are obviously much smaller than this community - which I think could benefit from adding as neutral a party as possible to the mod team (I suggest Smith)

8
Graphenium 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ahh, in this context all that means is that he hit “ignore report” on someone’s report of that post/comment - the post/comment was never actually hidden from view though. Sometimes when he does this he will even post a comment reply under the reported item saying “reported for rule 16 - not a violation, no sanction” or whatever, I get those all the time

8
Graphenium 8 points ago +8 / -0

Do any of the removals show up here? :

https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/logs

You can tell what process did the removal, there are mod actions (almost exclusively done by dom here), global filter removals (filter options set by the global admins, things like link shorteners etc get removed by this), and lastly community filter removals which I don’t think dom has set up here yet. You’d think if there were an automated removal upon a certain number of reports that the recent pedo shit would be long gone by now...

8
Graphenium 8 points ago +8 / -0

Just guessing but, it would make sense to me that the “KiA rules” reports go to the KiA mods while the “site wide violations” reports go to mods and site admins?

I’ve never seen someone get “shadow banned”, much less in an automated manner by the site (you can effectively filter them out with Community Filters but that’s something else, setting rules on who can post/comment in a community based on their account statistics like age/score)

8
Graphenium 8 points ago +8 / -0

Is that true about the automated system if something is mass reported? I haven’t seen that before... at a minimum the admins of the site should be clearing that queue even in communities they aren’t the “official” moderator of (like KiA2)

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ehhh....this pedo insurgent has only only been posting here since dom’s last visit, and tangentially I don’t think the ConPro mods could mod their way out of a wet sack of shit, given their track record

10
Graphenium 10 points ago +10 / -0

I think it is inevitable that it falls apart, but there is also a chance the division only lasts a decade or two.

Reminds me of the Foundation novels, about the predicted collapse of the galactic empire and the intricate plan to reduce the time spent in the violent interregnum

15
Graphenium 15 points ago +15 / -0

I think his point is:

The “threat” of communist takeover was then as the “threat” of anti semitism is today - a rhetorical bludgeon used to erode American liberty. He may or may not consider the possibility of a communist takeover in the 1950s as having been a plausible reality.

Imo, to say that we are ruled by “communists” is I think a bit short sighted. “Communism” and “capitalism” are both rungs of the ladder far below the actual ideology of whoever engineered the “take-over”, and regarding when it occurred, I think convincing cases could be made for dates far earlier than the 50s

10
Graphenium 10 points ago +10 / -0

”Not in my lifetime,” I used to think when contemplating America’s decline and fall—a decline and fall I eagerly anticipate as a prelude to remaking our crumbly republic such that it stands for the ideals it professes to uphold but unreservedly ignores. Blind justice, disinterested leaders and institutions, tolerance of others, freedom of thought and speech, a Jeffersonian respect for reason and knowledge: Those who come after me will see the imperium’s collapse and will begin the work of restoration, but not I.

So I long assumed. And so does the pace of events suggest I may well be wrong. Things I used to think would take, maybe, 20 years now occur in five or six or seven. If I reckoned some turn of history’s wheel was a decade out, what do you know but that it now seems hard upon us.

Decline and fall. It is not pleasant to live in such a time as ours, but it is, as the Chinese are credited with saying (or was it the Arabs?) interesting. Let us not, as we accept our fate, lose sight of the optimism within the apparent pessimism.

On May 2 the House passed a bill that, broadly speaking, defines as “antisemitic” any criticism of Israel, or—heaven forbid!—disapproval of Israel as a “Jewish state.” The kookier House members have been trying to get this rationally disconnected piece of legislation to the floor for eight years. The House now sends the Antisemitism Awareness Act to the Senate on a 320–to–19 vote.

As if to second the House’s intent, President Biden announced, a May 7 event marking the Holocaust Memorial Museum’s annual remembrance day, a series of new legal and administrative measures to counter the nonexistent crisis of antisemitism that now overtakes the U.S. the way a Communist takeover did in the 1950s. Will someone explain why we hear daily about all this antisemitism but cannot see anything of it more than the odd, unalarming case—the everyday here-and-there variety? Someone, anyone?

This is an assault on reason, language, law—and even that highest of American “values”—common sense. It is a sign of American weakness and further advances this weakness. I would ask what the people pushing this bill are thinking, but the question implies an assumption one ought not make.

Continued in the article

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +4 / -1

Judging by his most recent comments, he stands for the extermination of Palestinians and against “leftists”

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +5 / -2

You're the one pretending the Islamic savages are the poor victims of Israeli aggression.

That would appear to be the case by any rational look at the facts:

https://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/16516.jpeg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli–Palestinian_conflict

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +5 / -2

everyone who disagrees with the state of israel (which is supported by literally 110% of the federal government) is a FED!

Blow it out your ass, clown 🤡

5
Graphenium 5 points ago +8 / -3

My position is actually “less people should die”, if that wasn’t obvious from my post of a meme mocking the dogshit argument that genocide is ok if I don’t like them

9
Graphenium 9 points ago +10 / -1

https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/11RNtLRK8T/a-discussion-i-think-everyone-co/c

One of my first ten posts here, over three years ago. What have you ever posted to show you aren’t just a zionist shill with slightly broader interests than most of them (i.e. Jester)?

12
Graphenium 12 points ago +14 / -2

Yeah it’s because these ones

Machiavellian evil-genius Jews

Aren’t the same as the ones who suffer the consequences of their actions. The Machiavellian ones refer to the other ones as their “burnt offering”

8
Graphenium 8 points ago +9 / -1

misplaced outrage

factual redirection

u r dum

Take a look in the mirror

18
Graphenium 18 points ago +22 / -4

This would mean something if you weren’t a single issue zionist shill handshake fake account

24
Graphenium 24 points ago +31 / -7

It’s also obviously nothing more than a dishonest attempt to manipulate goyish opinions through double standards and deception

Edit for the sub-80 iq non-israeli zionists here (and any trigger happy mod) :

  1. gay marriage is illegal in israel

  2. they’re all out of roofs in palestine

view more: Next ›