What's the point of forming a relationship if you're not even going to also connect sexually? If religious puritans and the most repressed conservatives can do that, What's the left's excuse?
This guy is a cuck because he didn't just go 'so you don't want to be with me physically, ok glad you talked with me about this, bye' there is no point continuing the relationship after that.
To be fair, some women play the game better by fucking you like a champ UNTIL you're married then slowly cut it off. Then, either it's completely dead bedroom or they'll dole out sex as a manipulation trick.
And thanks to our family court system, you have zero leverage to fix the situation without being divorce-raped.
And thanks to our family court system, you have zero leverage to fix the situation without being divorce-raped.
A river stone while isolated in the woods would beg to differ. Accidents happen, people fall, rocks hurt, one rock looks no different from another and they all end up cleaned off from the current slowly eroding them.
Oh yeah just blame the victim for having no better options and still wanting to continue his bloodline, it's not the worthless whore's fault at all! Fuck you faggot.
And once they are married, it's game over. Either run through the divorce rape courts and finance the whores post-marriage fuck fest in the house you pay for but no longer live in, or sit there in the dead bedroom marriage (while she disappears for days on "business trips")
Or you could take matters into your own hands then get all expense paid housing and food on the tax payers dime while that slut burns in hell being raped by satan like she deserves.
There can be relationships without sex but it does seem unusual to have a marriage like that. Though all marriages probably trend that way as the couple grows old.
Something that I consider a white pill is it seems that these literal cucks are in the minority and we know this because women in the west at least statistically simply aren't able to hold onto a partner or men are just avoiding them altogether because of shit like this. The psyop by the left to make men accept these conditions simply isn't working.
The psyop by the left to make men accept these conditions simply isn't working.
Avoiding relationships is the result of a simple risk vs reward assessment. Men are avoiding relationships due to the risk far outweighing any potential rewards. Trying to shame them for it is pointless.
Women are able to get almost any man they want, they just refuse to settle meanwhile average men are forced to resort to prostitution or rape if we're to ever have sex in our lives.
What's the point of forming a relationship if you're not even going to also connect sexually? If religious puritans and the most repressed conservatives can do that, What's the left's excuse?
It would be to produce children but these worthless sluts can't even do that right. I'll always nullify if I'm put on a jury for a man who killed his worthless slut wife.
This guy is a cuck because he didn't just go 'so you don't want to be with me physically, ok glad you talked with me about this, bye' there is no point continuing the relationship after that.
You clearly don't understand the modern dating market, men have to settle for whatever we can get and then end up in prison when the slut tries to leave us.
Rose was drawn to how stable Will seemed — so unlike the other men she had dated, who dreaded commitment.
As much as Will grounds her, Rose feels that the familiar calm of their relationship also shuts her down sexually.
I don't think I've ever seen such a brazen case of AF/BB in the wild. This is why red pillers warn men against being some ran though whore's betabux.
She knows that can be confusing, even frustrating, for Will, but she doesn’t like the idea of forcing herself to have sex.
Sometimes they shower together and hold each other naked, without any expectation of sex. Though Will remains hopeful that these moments will lead to something else, he doesn’t push it.
Will is a cuck with no self respect and Rose is a whore who's using him for his resources. You can bet your ass she didn't play this game with Chad and Tyrone. Hell, I have a pretty penny that says she's still getting piped by Chad and/or Tyrone on the side.
Many younger women, for instance, shaped in part by the #MeToo movement, are engaging in intentional abstinence. There are trends on TikTok about going “boysober,” a word coined by the comedian Hope Woodard, who says that taking a break from sex can be empowering for women who previously altered their desires to accommodate men.
That's fine. Finding a hobby that isn't whoring around will be good for them. They just shouldn't expect the benefits of a relationshit if they're not going to put out. There aren't enough cucks like Will to go around, and they're getting scarcer as more and more men get red pilled.
The primary readership of the The New York Pravda is the AWFUL demographic: affluent white female liberals.
Also, it could be part of a wider trend to push sexless marriages and female philandering. The NYPravda loves to start trends. It makes the pink hairs and male feminists feel important.
It’s funny how anyone who dares propose that women employ the af/bb dual mating strategy is immediately labeled a misogynist incel, and yet women will cop to this exact behavior, totally unprompted. It’s like when white nationalists get socially lynched for the crime of directly quoting Jews.
And men who want to put these whores in their place are wrongfully banned from everywhere we speak for "inciting violence" never mind the fact that each and everyone of these sluts deserve far more suffering than we could possibly inflict. Women don't deserve legal protection, they should be prey to be hunted.
Because it comes off as fedposting, and probably is for all we know. If glowies successfully encourage a trend of "violence against women" that'll play right into the hands of the feminist police state.
The only reason why feminism gives brown men a free pass to beat their women is because feminism doesn't actually care about women, they're just another head of the hydra meant to demoralize and destabilize Western societies. Just look at TERFs to find out what happens to feminists who actually believe in their own bullshit and didn't get the memo that feminism is just a weapon.
Angry disenfranchised young men are the current bogey man du jour of the police state. Meanwhile such men are being manipulated by glowies into either doing dumb shit that only serves the interests of said glowies, or they join the ranks of antifa to act as the goon squad of the Cathedral.
Because it comes off as fedposting, and probably is for all we know. If glowies successfully encourage a trend of "violence against women" that'll play right into the hands of the feminist police state.
No it won't, it would force women to stay home and find a man to be loyal to. the government needs no justication to pass laws and crack down, that's just a lie you tell yourself to demonize anyone who takes action.
Meanwhile such men are being manipulated by glowies into either doing dumb shit that only serves the interests of said glowies,
letting women walk all over you or exiting the dating market entirely is what they want you to do, taking action creates fear which creates obedience and undermines the state's monopoly on violence.
This is a great example of why you should never marry a woman who isn't tearing your clothes off for sweaty jungle sex at every moment. All women are horny, if she's not getting it from you she's getting it somewhere else.
Best advice for men : no matter how nice you are, she cannot fuck your niceness. She will tell you to ''just be yourself, you're so nice'' and you'll ''meet someone (else) eventually''.
Well ''someone else'' cannot fuck your niceness either.
There are things you can do to make youself more sexually attractive.
Exercise for visible arm muscle definition, fix your diet to get slim, groom/wash, dress clean and fix your posture.
None of that is an unrealistic beauty standart, nor time-consuming. You don't need a gym membership to do pushups and pick some weights you bought second-hand. Takes 20 minutes a day.
Problem is if we treat these sluts like they deserve we end up in prison for it. Nothing we're legally allowed to do to put them in their place. Sluts like this make me support acid attacks, the muslims have the right idea.
That's why women should be chained up indoors and not allowed to leave the house under any circumstances, those caught outside should be brutalized and hanged as an example to the rest.
I don't think I've ever seen such a brazen case of AF/BB in the wild. This is why red pillers warn men against being some ran though whore's betabux.
It's the only option have and most of us don't even have that. either get divorce raped, become a rapist or take inspiration from Eliot Rodgers, those are the only options for a common man.
Will is a cuck with no self respect and Rose is a whore who's using him for his resources
Self respect gets us nowhere, women need to be made property again and they should fear for their lives, it's the only way to keep sluts in line.
There aren't enough cucks like Will to go around, and they're getting scarcer as more and more men get red pilled.
You mean there aren't enough women willing to settle for average SMV males like will, women are always the problem and they have insane standards.
I'd call this bad bait if it wasn't published in a newspaper therefore having 20% of the population think its legitimate for that property alone.
Meanwhile I couldn't concoct a better straw man of modern women than this did in the first three paragraphs. It exists as demoralization for people who have trouble dating: the best that can happen for you is a sexless marriage with a woman who lists your "good qualities" in a way that seems insulting, while being entirely open about how much she fucked other men but not you, you stable little man you. Meanwhile the penalty for ending that marriage is to pay her half of the resources your precious stability happened to wrangle up.
Every act of sex is a negotiation down to when they can hug. You're so desperate for woman's touch that you will happily negotiate given that lack. She blames her sexual reticence (but only with you, not every other man she fucked) on her divorced mother "being forced to have sex with her father once a week".
Again, this is longhoused demoralization for the men not having sex that even in the best of cases they will continue not having sex. Some will take that murderous rage that builds as more and more of this bait becomes mainstream and turn it into action: that could be good action where they simply become the "men she fucked" (which is the true good modern outcome), or bad action where the supply curve of women shifts to the left, so to speak.
I agree overall, what's not talked about enough is that women who do this and I mean literally no sex while being in a relationship are displaying big signs of cheating. Assuming this is even real, the guy in the relationship is too fucking retarded to pick up on it. I bet it's worse than we all think and she's probably banging multiple guys in their own bed.
I would not take that bet because I would lose. A woman not getting dicked down in marriage is still getting dicked down.
As much as the Red Pill gets shit upon due to its entry into the mainstream, the core tenants still hold true. That every one of those tenants is touched upon in this article is why I'm convinced its a larp.
It exists as demoralization for people who have trouble dating: the best that can happen for you is a sexless marriage with a woman who lists your "good qualities" in a way that seems insulting, while being entirely open about how much she fucked other men but not you, you stable little man you. Meanwhile the penalty for ending that marriage is to pay her half of the resources your precious stability happened to wrangle up.
It's true though women are fucking whores who should never have been considered human, they're cattle at best but treated as our superiors
"Now, most days, Michelle masturbates in the morning, while John takes their daughter to preschool. He masturbates at night in the bathroom, while watching porn on his phone."
I was listening to a commentary on the key aspects of what keeps men in long term relationships and one of them was regular access to sex from a partner.
We also know that women have an aversion to men they don't find attractive and that is what leads to dead bedrooms. Women find it easier to forgo sex and have their libido disappear according to the situation they're in compared to men. There is a reality behind the jokes around marriage and sex.
All this article will do is lead to frustrated men. If anything, this could be considered the western sex strike.
We also know that women have an aversion to men they don't find attractive and that is what leads to dead bedrooms. Women find it easier to forgo sex and have their libido disappear according to the situation they're in compared to men. There is a reality behind the jokes around marriage and sex.
They shouldn't have a choice, marry an average guy, put out and bare his children or get publicly stoned. Fail to participate in the stoning and you're up next.
Now, seven years into their marriage, they have their own place: a one-bedroom apartment in Los Angeles, where Rose sees Pilates clients.
Uh huh. "Pilates clients", sure.
They go months without sex
Correction: Will goes months without sex. Rose is getting her back blown out during "pilates" sessions.
many, like Michelle, told me that becoming parents irrevocably changed their sex lives... Other mothers started to see sex as one more chore, another line item on their list of responsibilities.
It was always a chore for them. They were only doing it until they could manipulate Mr. Betabux into a relationship that he can't escape without severe financial penalties. Now that he is locked in, she is free to make sweet, sweet love to his bank account to her heart's content. Men should never commit fully to a woman. That is the path to slavery, so always keep one foot out the door and be ready to walk away as soon as it is apparent that your turn riding the whore is over.
This shit is infuriating. Social media and dating apps have completely destroyed women. The collapse of this degenerate society can't come soon enough. I want off this mouse utopia experiment ride.
Not like we have a choice when women refuse to settle.
That is the path to slavery, so always keep one foot out the door and be ready to walk away as soon as it is apparent that your turn riding the whore is over.
There's no way to leave while the whore still draws breath.
Women should be property and disobedience and disloyalty should be punished via torture until death. That is the natural order and it has been subverted.
Michelle and John share a one-bedroom with their daughter, and while they get some privacy during the day, they’re busy working from home. Now, most days, Michelle masturbates in the morning, while John takes their daughter to preschool. He masturbates at night in the bathroom, while watching porn on his phone. For John, it’s merely a physical release, but for Michelle, pleasuring herself serves a different purpose: She is trying to figure out what makes her feel good. Exploring her changed body alone eliminates the guilt she has when she can’t climax with her husband. She doesn’t want him to think it has anything to do with him. “I want to get there, but it’s not getting there,” she says.
but for Michelle, pleasuring herself serves a different purpose: She is trying to figure out what makes her feel good. Exploring her changed body alone eliminates the guilt she has when she can’t climax with her husband.
Short of some nightmare of a perineal tear or an episiotomy, how different could her cooch possibly be after childbirth?
All of the parts that get wrecked are between 3 and 9 o'clock while the nerves that give pleasure are at noon.
Motherhood and the culture of misogyny in America are not often explored in tandem. The connection is women’s bodies.
When Amanda Montei became a parent, she struggled with the physicality of caring for children, but even more with the growing lack of autonomy she felt in her personal and professional life. The conditions of modern American parenthood—the lack of paid leave and affordable childcare, the isolation and alienation, the distribution of labor in her home, and the implicit demands of marriage—were not what she had expected.
After #MeToo, however, she began to see a connection between how women were feeling in motherhood and the larger culture of assault in which she had grown up. In American society, women are expected to prioritize their children, often by pushing their bodies to the limit and ignoring their own desires and needs. As she struggled to adjust to the new demands on her body, this stirred memories of being used, violated, and seen by men. She had the desperate urge to finally say no, though she didn’t know how, or to whom she might say it.
Written with the intellectual and emotional precision of writers like Roxane Gay and Leslie Jamison, and drawing on classic feminist thinkers such as bell hooks, Silvia Federici, and Adrienne Rich, as well as on popular culture from The Bachelor to Look Who’s Talking, Montei draws connections between caregiving, consent, reproductive control, and the sacrifices women are expected to make throughout their lives. Exploring the stories we tell about psychology, childbirth, sexuality, the family, the overwhelm mothers feel trying to be “good,” and the tender bonds that form between parent and child, Touched Out delivers a powerful critique of American rape culture and its continuation in the institution of motherhood, and considers what it really means to care in America.
I don't understand why you're supposed to get paid on leave. Do these people not save before having children?
My sister took 12 weeks off after having a child. She runs a small business, so she is not getting paid while on leave. Where is the crying for her? Who, exactly, is supposed to pay her when she goes on leave? Her customers???? The government????
Agreed. Like I get that sometimes things "happen", but women do at least 7-9 months notice that they "might" need to start planning ahead, save, and make plans.
And the other big issue is certainly "who" is supposed to pay for this? And how much is it going to add up as the rules end up being expanded and extended to not just help out women in bad situations, but unstable single mothers who are making bank on onlyfans, etc etc.
Paid leave is not need-based aid. You'd have to ask lefties about it, because I'm not a fan, but they seem to think that only people who are poor to get aid. In general. Except that they want women to get paid for not working no matter how needy they are.
A lot of this stuff is less about women though and more about how they get white people to pay for nonwhite babies. A lot of this "motherhood" crap becomes support for the invasion. Most aid is.
You know, on second thought, I'll admit that I can empathize with some of the kinds of challenges cited here.
Not that I'd likely agree with what kinds of political solutions I'm sure she proposes, but even between a happily married couple the first year of trying to take care of a new baby can be pretty brutal and draining. And I won't deny that mothers do get the brunt of it.
At the same time though, while it's not glaringly obvious in the cited text, I wouldn't be surprised if it parrots a lot of the usual feminist rhetoric that paints anything related to the experience of motherhood as a violent and heinous act committed by men upon them.
See, 20 years ago men would've given a shit about the hardships women can face.
But since then, they've gone mask off and don't even pretend that men suffer, or if they do, they don't care about it, so.
I really don't give a shit what women go through anymore. It was almost never worse than what men traditionally suffer.
We always lent an ear to women because they supported us and so we supported back, and we cared for the struggles of people we love.
Aye. I'll maybe extend my sympathies on a case by case, individual basis, with a woman I know, but I rarely reserve sympathy to the broader female-population at large. Or at least not since I was young and naive.
Women face no hardship and no amount of suffering can amount to what they inflict on average men. The only value women can provide is her womb, if all women became brain dead tomorrow and little more than breedable sex dolls the would would dramatically improve overnight.
Yeah it can be brutal and draining, kind of like... every other necessary activity required to maintain civilization.
At the same time though, while it's not glaringly obvious in the cited text, I wouldn't be surprised if it parrots a lot of the usual feminist rhetoric
What are you talking about lol? It is glaringly obvious. Muh body muh body muh body seen and heard kthnxbai
It was rather late at night and I couldn't be certain I was reading into it accurately.
Plus I was second guessing myself a bit since I was remembering a close friend of mine who's not had the easiest time taking care of a new kid. Not that she really complains much. She actually maintains a rather positive attitude and is very self-motivated.
The feminist wet dream. It's funny that lesbians don't try to pull this same scam. They understand that they can't get resources from women the same way they get from a man. The butch lesbos who are the doms would never put up with a dead bedroom.
They are infamous for domestic violence & renting UHAULS after they break up. I'm sure dead bedrooms exist but generally speaking the "top" (the one who wears the pants in the relationship) won't put up with it for very long.
How do they think things will go from there? Not just in the short-term, but for future generations? The red-pill theory would probably say if we follow this "advice," Chad and Tyrone's offspring will make up a gradually larger portion of later generations. What is the blue pill theory?
In any case, I don't think the Chad and Tyrone Jrs. of tomorrow are going to be as tolerant of these conditions (cucked by upper echelon chads) as the current wave of soyboys.
The bluepill theory is we put these whores back in their place and make examples of the ones who so much as complain so that the memories of it are forever burned into the minds of the survivors.
It's all fun and games for the progressive feminist whores until the Muslims are successful with their Western taqiyya infiltration and switch from "docile and passive" mode to "put on the burka, property" mode.
He should just poison the slut with some fentynal, get rid of the whore and drag her name through the mud as a worthless drug addict as well as a slut.
What's the point of forming a relationship if you're not even going to also connect sexually? If religious puritans and the most repressed conservatives can do that, What's the left's excuse?
This guy is a cuck because he didn't just go 'so you don't want to be with me physically, ok glad you talked with me about this, bye' there is no point continuing the relationship after that.
For whores to scam betas out of their resources of course.
Pretty much, it's one of the reasons I despise simps MORE than the thots for their enabling behaviour.
To be fair, some women play the game better by fucking you like a champ UNTIL you're married then slowly cut it off. Then, either it's completely dead bedroom or they'll dole out sex as a manipulation trick.
And thanks to our family court system, you have zero leverage to fix the situation without being divorce-raped.
A river stone while isolated in the woods would beg to differ. Accidents happen, people fall, rocks hurt, one rock looks no different from another and they all end up cleaned off from the current slowly eroding them.
Oh yeah just blame the victim for having no better options and still wanting to continue his bloodline, it's not the worthless whore's fault at all! Fuck you faggot.
And once they are married, it's game over. Either run through the divorce rape courts and finance the whores post-marriage fuck fest in the house you pay for but no longer live in, or sit there in the dead bedroom marriage (while she disappears for days on "business trips")
Or you could take matters into your own hands then get all expense paid housing and food on the tax payers dime while that slut burns in hell being raped by satan like she deserves.
There can be relationships without sex but it does seem unusual to have a marriage like that. Though all marriages probably trend that way as the couple grows old.
I was gonna say I don't care if people dont', and I know a lot of married couples that don't have sex. Definitely after they get old.
Every social bargain that women were once beholden to has been nullified.
Something that I consider a white pill is it seems that these literal cucks are in the minority and we know this because women in the west at least statistically simply aren't able to hold onto a partner or men are just avoiding them altogether because of shit like this. The psyop by the left to make men accept these conditions simply isn't working.
Avoiding relationships is the result of a simple risk vs reward assessment. Men are avoiding relationships due to the risk far outweighing any potential rewards. Trying to shame them for it is pointless.
We aren't avoiding relationships we're fucking desperate but these worthless whores would rather fuck chad than settle for a normal guy.
And increasingly more men would rather fuck their hands than pay full sticker price for Chads old used car he no longer wants
Most don't even have the option for a used up slut.
Women are able to get almost any man they want, they just refuse to settle meanwhile average men are forced to resort to prostitution or rape if we're to ever have sex in our lives.
It would be to produce children but these worthless sluts can't even do that right. I'll always nullify if I'm put on a jury for a man who killed his worthless slut wife.
You clearly don't understand the modern dating market, men have to settle for whatever we can get and then end up in prison when the slut tries to leave us.
I don't think I've ever seen such a brazen case of AF/BB in the wild. This is why red pillers warn men against being some ran though whore's betabux.
Will is a cuck with no self respect and Rose is a whore who's using him for his resources. You can bet your ass she didn't play this game with Chad and Tyrone. Hell, I have a pretty penny that says she's still getting piped by Chad and/or Tyrone on the side.
That's fine. Finding a hobby that isn't whoring around will be good for them. They just shouldn't expect the benefits of a relationshit if they're not going to put out. There aren't enough cucks like Will to go around, and they're getting scarcer as more and more men get red pilled.
The primary readership of the The New York Pravda is the AWFUL demographic: affluent white female liberals.
Also, it could be part of a wider trend to push sexless marriages and female philandering. The NYPravda loves to start trends. It makes the pink hairs and male feminists feel important.
It’s funny how anyone who dares propose that women employ the af/bb dual mating strategy is immediately labeled a misogynist incel, and yet women will cop to this exact behavior, totally unprompted. It’s like when white nationalists get socially lynched for the crime of directly quoting Jews.
And men who want to put these whores in their place are wrongfully banned from everywhere we speak for "inciting violence" never mind the fact that each and everyone of these sluts deserve far more suffering than we could possibly inflict. Women don't deserve legal protection, they should be prey to be hunted.
Because it comes off as fedposting, and probably is for all we know. If glowies successfully encourage a trend of "violence against women" that'll play right into the hands of the feminist police state.
The only reason why feminism gives brown men a free pass to beat their women is because feminism doesn't actually care about women, they're just another head of the hydra meant to demoralize and destabilize Western societies. Just look at TERFs to find out what happens to feminists who actually believe in their own bullshit and didn't get the memo that feminism is just a weapon.
Angry disenfranchised young men are the current bogey man du jour of the police state. Meanwhile such men are being manipulated by glowies into either doing dumb shit that only serves the interests of said glowies, or they join the ranks of antifa to act as the goon squad of the Cathedral.
No it won't, it would force women to stay home and find a man to be loyal to. the government needs no justication to pass laws and crack down, that's just a lie you tell yourself to demonize anyone who takes action.
letting women walk all over you or exiting the dating market entirely is what they want you to do, taking action creates fear which creates obedience and undermines the state's monopoly on violence.
This is a great example of why you should never marry a woman who isn't tearing your clothes off for sweaty jungle sex at every moment. All women are horny, if she's not getting it from you she's getting it somewhere else.
Best advice for men : no matter how nice you are, she cannot fuck your niceness. She will tell you to ''just be yourself, you're so nice'' and you'll ''meet someone (else) eventually''.
Well ''someone else'' cannot fuck your niceness either.
There are things you can do to make youself more sexually attractive.
Exercise for visible arm muscle definition, fix your diet to get slim, groom/wash, dress clean and fix your posture.
None of that is an unrealistic beauty standart, nor time-consuming. You don't need a gym membership to do pushups and pick some weights you bought second-hand. Takes 20 minutes a day.
Problem is if we treat these sluts like they deserve we end up in prison for it. Nothing we're legally allowed to do to put them in their place. Sluts like this make me support acid attacks, the muslims have the right idea.
That's why women should be chained up indoors and not allowed to leave the house under any circumstances, those caught outside should be brutalized and hanged as an example to the rest.
Wait, which is AF?
Alphafux, the only arrangement any man should accept.
It's the only option have and most of us don't even have that. either get divorce raped, become a rapist or take inspiration from Eliot Rodgers, those are the only options for a common man.
Self respect gets us nowhere, women need to be made property again and they should fear for their lives, it's the only way to keep sluts in line.
You mean there aren't enough women willing to settle for average SMV males like will, women are always the problem and they have insane standards.
As usual, when a headline ends in a question mark, the answer is no.
I'd call this bad bait if it wasn't published in a newspaper therefore having 20% of the population think its legitimate for that property alone.
Meanwhile I couldn't concoct a better straw man of modern women than this did in the first three paragraphs. It exists as demoralization for people who have trouble dating: the best that can happen for you is a sexless marriage with a woman who lists your "good qualities" in a way that seems insulting, while being entirely open about how much she fucked other men but not you, you stable little man you. Meanwhile the penalty for ending that marriage is to pay her half of the resources your precious stability happened to wrangle up.
Every act of sex is a negotiation down to when they can hug. You're so desperate for woman's touch that you will happily negotiate given that lack. She blames her sexual reticence (but only with you, not every other man she fucked) on her divorced mother "being forced to have sex with her father once a week".
Again, this is longhoused demoralization for the men not having sex that even in the best of cases they will continue not having sex. Some will take that murderous rage that builds as more and more of this bait becomes mainstream and turn it into action: that could be good action where they simply become the "men she fucked" (which is the true good modern outcome), or bad action where the supply curve of women shifts to the left, so to speak.
I agree overall, what's not talked about enough is that women who do this and I mean literally no sex while being in a relationship are displaying big signs of cheating. Assuming this is even real, the guy in the relationship is too fucking retarded to pick up on it. I bet it's worse than we all think and she's probably banging multiple guys in their own bed.
I would not take that bet because I would lose. A woman not getting dicked down in marriage is still getting dicked down.
As much as the Red Pill gets shit upon due to its entry into the mainstream, the core tenants still hold true. That every one of those tenants is touched upon in this article is why I'm convinced its a larp.
Not like the guy can do anything except kill his whore wife and everyone on her contacts list then live it up on the tax payers dime in prison.
It's true though women are fucking whores who should never have been considered human, they're cattle at best but treated as our superiors
"Now, most days, Michelle masturbates in the morning, while John takes their daughter to preschool. He masturbates at night in the bathroom, while watching porn on his phone."
I can't
I cringed hard at that part too. Seems all the press want to do is to normalize misery.
I was listening to a commentary on the key aspects of what keeps men in long term relationships and one of them was regular access to sex from a partner.
We also know that women have an aversion to men they don't find attractive and that is what leads to dead bedrooms. Women find it easier to forgo sex and have their libido disappear according to the situation they're in compared to men. There is a reality behind the jokes around marriage and sex.
All this article will do is lead to frustrated men. If anything, this could be considered the western sex strike.
Western women can’t strike any harder they already are. This is just them trying to normalize open beta bux/alpha fux behavior.
They shouldn't have a choice, marry an average guy, put out and bare his children or get publicly stoned. Fail to participate in the stoning and you're up next.
Uh huh. "Pilates clients", sure.
Correction: Will goes months without sex. Rose is getting her back blown out during "pilates" sessions.
It was always a chore for them. They were only doing it until they could manipulate Mr. Betabux into a relationship that he can't escape without severe financial penalties. Now that he is locked in, she is free to make sweet, sweet love to his bank account to her heart's content. Men should never commit fully to a woman. That is the path to slavery, so always keep one foot out the door and be ready to walk away as soon as it is apparent that your turn riding the whore is over.
This shit is infuriating. Social media and dating apps have completely destroyed women. The collapse of this degenerate society can't come soon enough. I want off this mouse utopia experiment ride.
Not like we have a choice when women refuse to settle.
There's no way to leave while the whore still draws breath.
Women should be property and disobedience and disloyalty should be punished via torture until death. That is the natural order and it has been subverted.
Yeah okay, you're just a fed. Or an antifa plant.
No way you're actually real lol, this shit is such a corny parody of what SJWs and feds think the "alt-right" or w/e believes.
No I'm just sick and tired of women being able to ruin the lives of men.
Huh??????
"it's different when I do it" - anything from a woman
Short of some nightmare of a perineal tear or an episiotomy, how different could her cooch possibly be after childbirth?
All of the parts that get wrecked are between 3 and 9 o'clock while the nerves that give pleasure are at noon.
She's fucked up and can only get off on rape now.
I think the person who wrote that article also wrote this "masterpiece":
https://archive.is/DFjqy
Archive doesn't include the whole excerpt, so I'll copy and paste it in a followup comment.
I don't understand why you're supposed to get paid on leave. Do these people not save before having children?
My sister took 12 weeks off after having a child. She runs a small business, so she is not getting paid while on leave. Where is the crying for her? Who, exactly, is supposed to pay her when she goes on leave? Her customers???? The government????
Agreed. Like I get that sometimes things "happen", but women do at least 7-9 months notice that they "might" need to start planning ahead, save, and make plans.
And the other big issue is certainly "who" is supposed to pay for this? And how much is it going to add up as the rules end up being expanded and extended to not just help out women in bad situations, but unstable single mothers who are making bank on onlyfans, etc etc.
Paid leave is not need-based aid. You'd have to ask lefties about it, because I'm not a fan, but they seem to think that only people who are poor to get aid. In general. Except that they want women to get paid for not working no matter how needy they are.
A lot of this stuff is less about women though and more about how they get white people to pay for nonwhite babies. A lot of this "motherhood" crap becomes support for the invasion. Most aid is.
Aye, that's a good point too. I somehow forgot about the rats and mongrels who breed like rodents without any kind of second thought.
You know, on second thought, I'll admit that I can empathize with some of the kinds of challenges cited here.
Not that I'd likely agree with what kinds of political solutions I'm sure she proposes, but even between a happily married couple the first year of trying to take care of a new baby can be pretty brutal and draining. And I won't deny that mothers do get the brunt of it.
At the same time though, while it's not glaringly obvious in the cited text, I wouldn't be surprised if it parrots a lot of the usual feminist rhetoric that paints anything related to the experience of motherhood as a violent and heinous act committed by men upon them.
See, 20 years ago men would've given a shit about the hardships women can face.
But since then, they've gone mask off and don't even pretend that men suffer, or if they do, they don't care about it, so.
I really don't give a shit what women go through anymore. It was almost never worse than what men traditionally suffer. We always lent an ear to women because they supported us and so we supported back, and we cared for the struggles of people we love.
There is no love in the Modern American Woman.
Aye. I'll maybe extend my sympathies on a case by case, individual basis, with a woman I know, but I rarely reserve sympathy to the broader female-population at large. Or at least not since I was young and naive.
Women face no hardship and no amount of suffering can amount to what they inflict on average men. The only value women can provide is her womb, if all women became brain dead tomorrow and little more than breedable sex dolls the would would dramatically improve overnight.
Yeah it can be brutal and draining, kind of like... every other necessary activity required to maintain civilization.
What are you talking about lol? It is glaringly obvious. Muh body muh body muh body seen and heard kthnxbai
It was rather late at night and I couldn't be certain I was reading into it accurately.
Plus I was second guessing myself a bit since I was remembering a close friend of mine who's not had the easiest time taking care of a new kid. Not that she really complains much. She actually maintains a rather positive attitude and is very self-motivated.
But anyway, my perspective was thrown off a bit.
The feminist wet dream. It's funny that lesbians don't try to pull this same scam. They understand that they can't get resources from women the same way they get from a man. The butch lesbos who are the doms would never put up with a dead bedroom.
I thought lesbians were infamous for dead bedrooms?
They are infamous for domestic violence & renting UHAULS after they break up. I'm sure dead bedrooms exist but generally speaking the "top" (the one who wears the pants in the relationship) won't put up with it for very long.
The bedrooms won't be dead when Tyrone comes to visit
How do they think things will go from there? Not just in the short-term, but for future generations? The red-pill theory would probably say if we follow this "advice," Chad and Tyrone's offspring will make up a gradually larger portion of later generations. What is the blue pill theory?
In any case, I don't think the Chad and Tyrone Jrs. of tomorrow are going to be as tolerant of these conditions (cucked by upper echelon chads) as the current wave of soyboys.
Emotional people don't need theories.
The bluepill theory is we put these whores back in their place and make examples of the ones who so much as complain so that the memories of it are forever burned into the minds of the survivors.
This is the most gay shit I've ever read.
It's all fun and games for the progressive feminist whores until the Muslims are successful with their Western taqiyya infiltration and switch from "docile and passive" mode to "put on the burka, property" mode.
Sexless marriage, in other words, marriage?
I kid, but once you've been with someone for a decade or two, things taper off.
Its only dead for you the guy. She's getting a lot of action while you're out working or something lol.
He should just poison the slut with some fentynal, get rid of the whore and drag her name through the mud as a worthless drug addict as well as a slut.
Shit like this makes me understand the Islamic perspective on certain things.
Or the Sean Connery perspective, rather.
Sean Connery was too weak, modern women call for islamic solutions.
Just once I'd love to watch a video of one of these sluts getting what she deserves.