It makes perfect sense to me that in ancient polytheist worlds, each city had their own god, and physical conflicts were also seen as conflicts between gods, and which ones were stronger. In reality, humans were taking metaphysical concepts to the fields of battle, and seeing which could bring a people more prosperity.
For some reason this reminds me of Black & White 2
But think of the convenience when you are renting, you do not need to have anything but a phone or even a chip...
What level of information research? Cause he do not read studies, this I promise you. It is even poor outrage drama/bait, Does he even have any interesting insight into anything?
Kindly do provide Intel on why anyone should listen to this.
First time I listen to it and what is this shit?
All I get from them is nil, does not get anything interesting out of them, they are neither entertaining nor do they provide any good data. Why do you actually like them? And the Microsoft Acquisition is a win win? The gamepass is free and good news? He reads part of the articles about a game and a movie he knows nothing on and so on, Once more what does this provide?
That some harsh living for the kid, to lose both of the parents at the same place at the same time.
So terrorism is the answer?
Well, as hr departments in the west tells you, you may only stare for 5 sec, anymore and you need to pay.
They're constantly agreeing on everything.
Why haven't men fought back?
They have
And so on, The Feminist still believes in the old narrative and uses it to push the modern narrative, The bloke seems to be gently rebuking it in a diplomatic manner (Unsure if it is actual beliefs or just diplomacy) and through different avenues while both give credence to a terrorist org for the breakthrough or change historically.
No, Comment indicates he has moved away from UK, Presumably to the states.
But do you want their input on it? And what is the input you seek? For instance And this is part of the same stuff you always post about but the comment engagement is very low (although one of them got a lot votes)
Cause as I said there, you did get some input on it, just not the with same gusto or zealously.
Furthermore many post and even comments which are more thoughtful do not receive a lot engagement (according to me), and most of the engagement (even what I myself type) is of low effort. To me this forum seems to have ebbs and flows when people got the energy and time to discuss issues. It is a bit similar to the chans a lot empty prattle with some interesting ideas exchange from time to time.
The more interesting question would perhaps be how to trigger the engagement you want?
Pardon the rambling.
Now you are making me confused, We are talking about the same post right?, there is no other post in which has gotten you demotivated to make more thoughtful posts?
I'd make a post on it, but the last time I put effort into a post, nobody read it.
Several points, One I think you posted it during a slow time, several poster has noted that they don't really look for old post, so if it is gone from hot and first page of new, it does not exist.
Two, You are memed here for one ardent opinion which is considered very controversial compared to others opinion, this conflict of ideas create most of your engagement with others, (specially antonio)
Three, This is not even close to the post with least engagement, it probably has a poor effort to engagement ratio, but it is not one with the least engagement.
Quit your whining or provide data/arguments to refute me.
According to TheImpossible1 we have technology, I sure would like to read those studies.
My solution? We have the technology. - Let's make them biologically irrelevant and condemn them to a life of complete and utter nothingness, where they just blend into the background of society. Nothing would make them angrier than their pathetic delusions of being superior being shot down.
As always a feminist does not understand the world. Current, past nor future.
Someday our descendants will describe our several generations as generations of driveling do-nothings. First we submissively allowed them to massacre us by the millions and then with devoted concern we tended the murderers in their prosperous old age. What are we to do if the great Russian tradition of penitence is incomprehensible and absurd to them? What are we to do if the animal terror of hearing even one-hundredth part of all they subjected others to outweighs in their hearts any inclination to justice? If they cling greedily to the harvest of benefits they have watered with the blood of those who perished? It is clear enough that those men who turned the handle of the meat grinder even as late as 1937 are no longer young. They are fifty to eighty years old. They have lived the best years of their lives prosperously, well nourished and comfortable, so that it is too late for any kind of equal retribution as far as they are concerned.
Gulag Archipelago
So the odds are not in our favor, but there is no other way then to keep records and work towards a tomorrow where we do not repeat the Russian tradition.
Most of the internet is cancer without adblock
A total of 270 experts and medical professionals called on the streaming giant to adopt a misinformation policy after the comedian hosted the controversial Dr Robert Malone last month.
Careful there tovarich,
You are declaring people to be the enemy cause they have no hope, sure those people are not useful to the cause,but if you still think freedom has value then the voice of the hopeless must be allowed to be heard.
He is just ahead of the game...
Atleast he tried , most of the time I ask friends and acquaintance to even try they do about one or 2 clicks at the most.
The gaslighting by the Media is quite severe.
Not much to add, they can't even be bothered to link to the source when it is easily on the Web, see for instance
Anyhow I think it also has some motivation in keeping your news/journalistic source a walled garden (Most news site link only to their own article on the site about even other references) in conjunction with the even more reliance of the search engines to delist/deprioritize sources it will increase the hurdle to find data and keep people in the gardens.
All this reminds me of the EU article 11 (link tax) which would further worsen this behavior.
But don't you see the fountain is where they are hiding the bunker! It is the most important structure!
Not sure a Microsoft Monopoly would be much better.