"fully clothed" my ass (and her's). if I walked into a business with see-through pants and nothing but tidy whities underneath, you can be sure as shit I would rightfully be kicked out, maybe even had the cops called on me.
pretty sure this is technically a felony.
even then, I'm sure there are plenty of AI glowniggers out there trained to imitate what the left thinks a right leading person is. nothing on the Internet is trustworthy, it never has been.
friendly PSA to never be caught standing in the middle of the woods menacingly, my fellow man identifying chuds!
/s
who is this faggot and why should I care about what he has to say?
do not suffer the opinions of whores
dead internet theory is real. hell, I wouldn't even be surprised if half of the accounts on this site were bots.
women need to be forced into being wives again and until that happens their lives should be made a living hell in every aspect
This kind of comical (actual) misogyny is the exact narrative that game journals used to slander gamergate. nobody in gamergate actually holds this kind of position, but well poisoners need it to exist because otherwise they're narrative falls apart.
I'm sure that won't backfire in any way shape or form.
Also, fed
when the facts are redefined as "any truth ordained and approved by our institutions", he's not wrong
they are so close, yet so far. "troon" is simply a derogatory term for a transgender person who does not pass. it doesn't just make fun of someone for being a tranny, but it explicitly accuses them of being bad at it.
what 13-year-old girls are you hanging out with, and should I be calling the cops?
being aware of social privileges that women may have over men is a completely different thing from being aware of title IX and it's mechanics. 5 to 6 years will include their high school education, where civics and basic constitutional law would be taught in an ideal society. you should reserve judgment until then.
or do you think a sixth grader just starting algebra should know calculus?
maybe, but I'm not one to punish those for crimes they haven't committed.
I could be wrong, but my understanding was "there is no excuse for not paying your taxes".
Fair. so if I were part of the conversation, I would do my best to let them know that the crappy situation they're in is not their fault. framing it otherwise would create uneeded melodrama.
they're underaged children. You cannot reasonably expect them to be politically active in any sense, let alone be aware of the legal minutiae of their existence.
vtuber shit
gay.
With that out of the way, what does one even do in this situation? the feds love putting in the language that says you are ultimately responsible for your taxes, and you have to pay them even if someone who told you they were paying them ended up not doing so. can someone even find the employer liable in the situation?
EDIT: this is not formal or legal tax advice. consult your tax preparer and/or lawyer.
the girls in question had nothing to do with that, they were babies and children when all that was going down.
devil's advocate: the girls who were banned didn't, they're too young to have participated in that movement. they're reaping the consequences of their predecessors.
Brute: an extremely strong and imposing individual who is also very headstrong, often simple minded.
Chud: a derogatory term for an American who leans right politically
these two words have completely different meanings, to the point where I think the localizer might actually be retarded. I can imagine them thinking any and all insults are synonymous, and that it would apparently be grammatically correct to also localize the word as "dumb dumb poopy face!"
for this reason I find it hilarious as a reclaimed word, much like "nigger".
yep, that one looks more real.
this. you've pretty much nailed it on the head