You guys may remember my inane rantings about the width of vehicles? It turns out I'm not insane on this issue at all and there's maths being done and it's not just the lack of English speakers in suburban areas that are going to become a major problem it's the fact that foreigners ( Yes it's mainly foreigners you see in these cars ) are buying cars that are too fucking big for most of the roads here.
Even the most irritating chav knows not to go onto minor roads with their fucking Subaru but lately I've been seeing it more and more that you have an even bigger problem than people buying massive cars that can't fit on even the major roads. There are douchebags who deliberately taking their oversized vehicles onto minor roads knowing they're too big and they block up the entire area stopping people from getting anywhere so everybody has to move around and accommodate them and I had an encounter yesterday dealing with just that which managed to set me off.
New data suggests that cars in the UK are starting to exceed the 180cm minimum width for on-street parking as drivers in Britain tend to opt for larger SUVs.
T&E's study found that the average width of new cars (not including the wing mirrors) expanded by 2.5cm between 2017 (177.8cm) and 2023 (180.3cm).
This one you may find particularly interesting.
This is because the traditional parking space at a supermarket or multistorey car park has remained unchanged for half a century.
The population density and vehicle size is simply changing far too fast for the infrastructure to keep up in a lot of places that were literally designed for horse and carriage. It's amazing the douchebags buying these vehicles can't put two and two together on that or they simply don't care and it seems to be more the latter these days. I know that quote was talking about supermarkets, but it's not just that, the minor roads are very much like this in the UK.
Oh this country is fucked, this is why I do my shops almost exclusively at night now, particularly at the worse times which in the UK is between 17:00 - 19:00 when everyone is coming home from their jobs. You have people clogging up roundabouts and making certain areas impossible to get through because they just occupy the roads rather than drive normally.
The articles are majorly wrong about one thing, the bigger vehicles are not going to cause more accidents, because in order to have an accident you have to be able to move. It's funny because they kind of contradict themselves in the articles themselves, at this rate it is going to be completely impractical to drive a car which is why I'm switching to a scooter.
Don't come here seriously lol.
I'm with the yanks and their tanks on this, infrastructure should expand, they blame these things on the congestion charges, but that's just their excuse to curtail your freedoms. Your freedom to have space, your freedom to have a car that goes beyond a '15 min' boundary.
If I want a tank I should be able to have a fucking tank. Your trains never fucking work and are always on strike, can't rely on that, so your roads should be far better. Far bigger.
And don't get me started on the welsh...
You can have a tank. But then don't expect to be allowed to drive on a street through the old city core or a old small village, that was build 200+ years ago. No, we are not flattening houses to be able to expand the road to accomodate your tank.
You don't have to flatten houses, that's what the tank is for.
LOL the problem is we simply don't have the room, people forget that realistically the UK is an island with a finite amount of space. Ordinarily I'd be right behind you. This is where we've got really dangerous communist territory expanding and they introduce 'buyout schemes' where they force home owners to sell their land massively below market value in order to accommodate these roads. It's like how you have retards who are trying to suggest 'build more homes' and they're simply going to plonk houses on every spare plot of land available even though the problem of population increase isn't going to go away just because of that since we're importing so many foreigners.
There are plenty of stories of country villages being wiped out in the UK that foreigners have never heard of precisely doing this. We don't have the damn space and there are going to be so many lives getting ruined because of it.
We genuinely don't, it's a maths problem, the mass migration definitely is the biggest factor in relation to this though. Foreigners don't realise how small this island really is. It's like the plan to stick a shit ton of migrants in Ireland, I wasn't surprised that they're burning down buildings over it because like me they know as well it simply won't work. We don't have the square footage to accommodate all this influx and it's finally biting us in the arse as expected.
It's probably a bit of lack of perspective thanks to history.
It's hard for a lot of people to see Britain as such a small island when you travel the entire span of it in less than a day when the British Empire once owned most of the world.
America being global considering It's size makes sense but a lot of people can't wrap their head around how that little island was once so powerful.
My wife and I were discussing the scale of the U.S. compared to European countries with our daughter yesterday.
If one were to drive west across Texas from Orange to El Paso the journey is about 870 miles or 1400 km.
The distance from Sennen Cove on the south western tip of Cornwall to John o' Groats the most north eastern point of Scotland is only 840 miles or 1350 km.
The total land area of Texas us 268.82 thousand square miles or 696.24 thousand square kilometers, with a population of 25.6 million in 2011
The total land area of Great Britain is only 80.8 thousand square miles or 209.33 square kilometers, with a population of 61 million in 2011
So Texas has more than 8 times the area but only about 41% of the population of Great Britain
This information is important to consider when discussing things like public and private transportation differences between the States and European countries.
Even states where public transportation would make sense have third-world shithole levels of corruption. How long has California worked on its high-speed rail connecting Sacramento to San Diego?
How many Historic city centres were demolished post war up until the 70's in the name of the car?
Here is Stockholm.
https://i.ibb.co/Kw6sYRZ/klara.png
Oh yeah, by the way in the UK there's plenty of people getting pissed off who live up North because of how much infrastructure constantly keeps revolving around London. All the train networks and everything else are geared towards getting London and nowhere else. The whole thing is going to collapse, it's just a question of when and it looks like even though the globalists have done a massive job keeping things in permanent decline the cracks are starting to show, sometimes literally.
I'd agree but "infrastructure should expand" in this case probably means demolishing historical buildings and areas to throw up globohomo "looks like every metro area but somehow uglier" architecture.
If you want a tank, you should be able to have a tank - but part of the freedom to do that means knowing it's not going to fit everywhere and making that compromise.