-1
somercet -1 points ago +1 / -2

The comments:

  • That goes into the statistics immediately: "right offenses"!
  • You won't see that on any German news channel.
  • Each and every one of them should be deported on the spot. Unbelievable what we have to put up with.
  • There you have your colorful variety!
  • Wonderful, so colorful and diverse!
  • But woe, Karl accidentally falls into the garbage can of the local synagogue ... Then special broadcasts run on all channels and Steinmeier and his friends announce the state of emergency and call for a fight against the right ... If it wasn't so sad, I would laugh.
  • If you bring Muslims into the country, you have Muslims in the country.
1
somercet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like, grow a pair and try something bold. Drop some asteroids, flood Sagami Bay like YKK, have youkai blow up some reactors like Arjuna...

It's probably easier when your country is doing well.

7
somercet 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yup. Chappelle twigs the alphabet people, but parrots them on intersectional Marxism to a "T".

1
somercet 1 point ago +1 / -0

By refusing any alliance with the West, unless they handed over the Baltic states, a concession he got from Hitler in the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, Stalin did more to kick off WWII in Europe than even Hitler.

Not to mention, the oncoming attack from Germany allowed the Japanese to pull forces out of Manchuria for their debut at Pearl Harbor.

1
somercet 1 point ago +1 / -0

the Mensheviks took power, and they instituted a democratic system and did not abolish capitalism in three years before the Red Army ended that experiment.

By sharing a party with the Bolsheviks, they made the Bolshies more palatable.

They are guilty.

The dispute originated at the Second Congress of the RSDLP, ostensibly over minor issues of party organization... The split proved to be long-standing and had to do both with pragmatic issues based in history, such as the failed revolution of 1905, and theoretical issues of class leadership, class alliances, and interpretations of historical materialism. While both factions believed that a "bourgeois democratic" revolution was necessary, the Mensheviks generally tended to be more moderate and were more positive towards the liberal opposition and the dominant peasant-based Socialist Revolutionary party.

1
somercet 1 point ago +2 / -1

Clownfish TV are dumbasses.

Yes, they're a cute couple, yes, they're mostly sensible, yes, they're not crazy Leftists. BUT:

They always re-broadcast the enemies' propaganda.

Look at that God-damned thumbnail. LOOK. AT. IT. (As Just Some Guy would say.) It presents the intersectional Marxists' claim that MLP fans are hate-filled KKKluxers AS A FACT.

I know they think they are foregrounding the craziness, but really they are only strengthening it.

If someone posts a graphic of "alt-right adjacents" showing Jordan Peterson's or Dave Rubin's heads next to Richard Spencer, then Kneon and Geeky Sparkles will put that image on the screen for 20 minutes, letting that image burn itself into their viewers' retinas while babbling over it.

If someone calls someone else racist, then they will sit there for 20 minutes, babbling, "OMG! MOTHER THERESA's not RACIST! MOTHER THERESA's not RACIST! MOTHER THERESA's not RACIST!" over and over again, until all their viewers hear, "MOTHER THERESA! RACIST! MOTHER THERESA! RACIST! MOTHER THERESA! RACIST!"

Both of these create links in viewer's minds.

But their most favorite trick ever, whenever someone links them to "conservative" or "far right" circles, is to shout at length, "OMG HOW COULD YOU THINK I'M CONSERVATIVE OMG THAT'S DISGUSTING OMG I COULD NEVER BE CONSERVATIVE!"

Imagine if a Leftie accused CTV of being black: "OMG HOW COULD YOU THINK I'M BLACK OMG THAT'S DISGUSTING OMG I COULD NEVER BE BLACK!" See the problem?

#Now, here's the funny bit.

Clownfish TV constantly complain about SJW sites linking them to the alt-right.

To which my response is, Why wouldn't they?! Whenever SJWs trash CTV, CTV instantly rebroadcasts their memes, repeats their talking points, and denounces conservatives . Why would even dumb Commies look at that and not think, "Hey, it's free real estate!"?

CTV feed their trolls, so they get more trolls. (To be fair, a lot of even outright Republican websites do this. We don't call them the Stupid Party for nothing.) Rhetorical skills are not just offensive, to break down your opponent's arguments. They are also defensive, like InfoSec for speakers and ideas. A few simple rhetorical devices to stop CTV's leaking of evil propaganda:

  1. STOP denouncing conservatives and right wingers. If some SJW "accuses" you of being "alt-right adjacent" or something, jujitsu their accusation back on them. Say, "So-and-so accuses me of being alt-right for not [whatever ludicrous BS they're pushing]. I voted for Obama. I didn't realize Obama voters are alt-right." Push the Commies' crap back on them.
  2. STOP repeating their talking points. Do some research: if Big Tata Nehisi Coates' compared Jordan Peterson to the Red Skull, chances are this isn't the first time he was this stupid. Look up his other dumb Tweets and post those. Bonus points for tweets so stupid he had to delete them. This implies his current stupidity is also destined for the trash. And don't forget the power of trashing them with their equally dumb and vicious fellow travelers.
  3. STOP rebroadcasting Leftie memes. Yes, you want to show the original picture to document the Leftie's crazed accusations. Fine. Show it for about ten seconds, but then replace that image with one that exposes the Leftie's framing in an unflattering light. Find an unflattering picture of the offender, or draw a meme-raging caricature of them, between (say) Mother Theresa and Richard Spencer, pointing to them, with the word bubble "THEY'RE EXACTLY THE SAME! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!" and leave that up for twenty minutes. (Feel free to label your drawing with the writer's or website's name/logo, you don't win points for technical skill.)

If they stop feeding the trolls, most of the trolls will go away.

3
somercet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Most of them? Smallpox.

That was the big killer of American Indians, and most of them in the century after 1492.

2
somercet 2 points ago +2 / -0

The irony is that trade unions were historically a bulwark against ideological Marxism.

Obviously not. They pushed policies that destroyed American prosperity. And they always have.

2
somercet 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Crushing corporations is good for corporations."

Maybe you're one of the people who think corporations are a special form of Evil, but if you aren't, could you please think of another term to refer to people or corps. that collude with the state to crush the competition?

26
somercet 26 points ago +26 / -0

"And that my friends is how you know GamerGate succeeded. It forever haunts them. There was no insurrection on the 6th. Bannon did not send milo in. And Matt jarbo is still a piece of trash."

3
somercet 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. Roddenberry started out a Kennedy New Frontier guy. But as someone said, "Liberalism entered the '60s proud of its accomplishments. It left the '60s ashamed of them."

I always thought that post-scarcity BS began from that throw-away line in Star Trek IV: "Money... they still use that here."

2
somercet 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's corporations that benefit from it

You're ignoring the 80+ years of crushing businesses and freedom of association, the very basis of a market economy. They were the original targets. They have since moved on.

Ayn Rand's last speech, "The Sanction of the Victims," talks about this.

2
somercet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not Wop? :-D

"Oblique" == "Bent"
"Extra Light" == "Pro-ana"

5
somercet 5 points ago +5 / -0

But I'd rather have leftist power that is arranged against corporate (SJW) power,

"Let's align with the Old Marxists against the Intersectional Marxists!"

Let's not.

I do support unionization of 'journalism', as that may give journalism just the push off the cliff that it needs

American schools have been unionized for decades. The Federal government is now bailing unions out directly.

No.

Nixon used China to balance the Soviet Union quite productively

  1. Soviet Russia and Maoist China had already fought a war.
  2. Nixon makes promises to China.
  3. Soviet Union collapses of internal rot 20 years later.
  4. Red China now eating our lunch.

Yes, that's turned out so well for us.

8
somercet 8 points ago +8 / -0

Someone was criticizing the unions in patriots.win, and got this response:

Having a manufacturing job that pays $30 an hour with a REQUIRED 4% union vig or working at a non-union convenience store at $12?

I would sell my soul to that devil for a better life for me and my family.

He did!

5
somercet 5 points ago +5 / -0

Robespierre was "more bourgeois" than Danton (who created the Committee of Public Safety), who was less radical than Hébert. They all exterminated the Girondins and threw the Convention to the inner wolves of man.

Pre-Thermidorian France was not as totalitarian as a Communist government. But it remains the prototype of almost all left-wing revolutions of today, down to the CHAZ.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›