Yes, I remember this. Back in the day, there was a Creationist who made the argument that the banana was evidence for Creation. Critics pointed out that it all falls apart if you replace the grocery store banana with a wild one.

Just a heads up, keep your ears open for the name DCCC. They ran attack ads on Gibbs. If they do the same, the candidate is probably worth a look.

How about:

Judah did evil in the eyes of the Lord. By the sins they committed they stirred up his jealous anger more than those who were before them had done. They also set up for themselves high places, sacred stones and Asherah poles on every high hill and under every spreading tree. There were even male shrine prostitutes in the land; the people engaged in all the detestable practices of the nations the Lord had driven out before the Israelites.

1 Kings 14:22-24

Not just white people.

Show them this.

"Every day that (Archie) continues to be given life-sustaining treatment is contrary to his best interests and, so, a stay, even for a short time, is against his best interests," he added.

Even if there's nothing to be done for him, I fail to see how dying sooner rather than later is in his "best interests".

By a secret cabal of straight white men, one would assume.

We already have a series about modern Robin Hoods. It's called Leverage.

Chris-chan also claims to be part sonichu and the second coming of Jesus. Even if you agree with transgenderism, you're right to be skeptical.

I just like trains, ok?

They did. They removed all 0 transphobic jokes.

"Human milk" was one of the suggestions, actually.

How is breast milk not inclusive? If the person produces milk, they have breasts.

I guess the rest of them are following the VP's lead. Why Harris felt the need to state the obvious is anyone's guess.

I think you mean "differently functional".

Why not both?

By the poster's own admission, he had more sexual partners in a single day than most people have had in their entire life.

Who does Disney think wants these live action remakes? Just broadcast the original movie.

Using the techniques in The Doomsday Calculation, there's a 50% chance of a Civil War between 2074 and 2493.

Can we avoid baking the batter and get a cake?

I seem to recall reading that they were the first to pipe natural gas into their houses for cooking and such.

I seem to recall the Torah says that if a married man dies without children, his brother must get her pregnant so his brother will have an heir. Seems like a modern version of that.

I would have thought Lithuania. It's a softer target, it cuts off Latvia and Estonia, and they'd have direct access to that chunk of land in the southern Baltic (since Belarus is such a close ally).

What, you've never used an outhouse?

I'm sure she'll have no objections to the "privileged" treating the "oppressed" however they like.