2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

You think you're going to hire a therapist because you didn't buy $100 worth of stress balls?

Are you even aware that that's a separate pot of money and the money is not transferrable?

No, again, that'd require to know "anything" about appropriations. But instead you just want to be mad.

And because you want to be mad you are now trying to actually argue that the VA shouldnt even be allowed to buy basic office supplies because you can't even admit that the OP tweeter is stupid for complaining about notebooks.

Like you can't even agree he was foolish to complain about that. That's how addicted you are to being mad.

And who would be legally responsible if the government subcontracted shitty workers who didn’t actually do their jobs and painted with something like lead paint pookums?

That has nothing to do with the Davis Bacon Act. Davis Bacon is a hundred years old law unions lobbied for to pay outrageous wages because unions couldn't compete with the non-union market. So every construction job the government does pays like $190/hr or something unreal and companies just pocket it.

Again, God forbid you learn anything.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

What else could you possibly be using your brainpower for when it was too much to ask for any of you to even look at the pictures in the tweet thread where he complained about them buying basic office supplies?

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

And yet you whine about "people like me" being the ones in charge of important functions and it is entirely because "people like you" are dumb faggots laboring in fields like a beast of burden, because it's all you're qualified to do.

You whine about college professors being leftist communists. Why aren't you a college professor then? You whine that your congressman is a RINO. Why aren't you primarying them then?

You were too stupid to be a lawyer so all the lawyers ended up being leftists. You were too stupid to be a doctor so all the doctors end up being leftists.

People like you don't have a single vision for the future except hoping somebody else will "do something".

It's why you're still proud of "muh vaccine", it's genuinely the only thing you ever 'did' to "fight the power" and yet we all know all that was required of us to not get the vaccine was... you just didn't get it. And in your mind you act like you fucking snuck across the Berlin Wall or some shit lol.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure I explicitly called out people like you already, because you refuse to read more than 10 words which is why your opinions end up being incredibly stupid and you fall for made up nonsense. Literally are the stereotype that conservatives are barely literate manual laboring third world tier simpletons.

It's why you fell for the nonsense about things like a $2,000 coffee cup, because it takes more than 10 words to explain why the coffee cup was $2,000, and your eyes glazed over and all you could think about was... I don't know, I'm smarter than you so I can't imagine what goes on in your head. I imagine a craving for Skoal and thinking about your truck? Maybe wondering about which negro would throw a ball harder than another negro this weekend? Or is your mind just kind of white noise? Like the "imagine an apple" experiment?

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless you're saying all gov spending is 100% all legit

Of course it's not 100% legit. For starters legitimacy is entirely subjective. You can argue that stress balls aren't necessary. A therapist might say otherwise. A mental health office that wants to hand out swag to remind people that they're there so maybe someday somebody sees the sticker stuck to the door and picks up the phone to give them a call might say otherwise.

CASE IN POINT THIS GUY IS COMPLAINING ABOUT NOTEBOOKS.

Do people like you even know what the Davis Bacon act is? No seriously. If you want to get angry at government spending you should know about things like the Davis Bacon act. You should be learning. You should be reading. If you are so concerned you should be looking into this and figuring out where the problem is.

But nah it's easier to have morons on Twitter posting rage bait for you to scream at.

That's why I call you all low IQ. Because you don't actually know any of this, but you think you're entitled to opinions on it. Why are we listening to stupid people who don't know things? What value is a stupid person's opinion?

I have seen the government pay $125,000 to have 10 or 15 offices repainted because of the Davis Bacon act. Yet I have never seen any of these conservative influencers on Twitter even mention it. Do you have an explanation for why that is beyond " they are uneducated and unknowledgeable about this topic "?

And if they're uneducated and unknowledgeable, why are you listening to anything they say about anything?

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

And you sound circumcized.

Lol. See, it's this kind of shit. You all act like this, but then you can't figure out why nobody takes you seriously.

No really. Nobody. You think I'm wrong? Name a fucking person. Anyone.

Your congressman doesn't care. Not even Trump cares what you think, which is why you just post endless purple face rage on this forum and you're shouting into a void and you still haven't figured out nobody cares. We're on month four or five of you screaming " arrest someone! " And nobody cares lmao and you still haven't figured it out. But you just keep shouting and shouting because you have nothing else.

You're still talking about this vaccine 3 years after even the left stopped caring about it, and it's because it's the only thing you feel you ever accomplished.

Even though everybody knows that the vaccine was still voluntary, and therefore not getting the vaccine just required you to not do something. Which is all you conservatives are good at.

Keep raging about the government spending $20 on a notebook though, I'm sure they're all lining up to take you super seriously.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

The funny thing is, I personally have seen wasteful government spending. I've seen a military unit purchase $500/ea. heavy-duty cold weather jackets after they were told explicitly to not buy them by senior leadership. But they bought them anyway, spending like $300,000 on the whole order.

But something like that you would never actually 'catch' because it's 'justifiable' because obviously military cold weather jackets are necessary. It's just "are those specific jackets necessary?"

But understanding that kind of waste requires you to have an IQ beyond what is barely sufficient to clean septic tanks or whatever most of you fuckups do for a """"living"""", so you're angry at $2 water bottles instead.

You don't know anything about how money is appropriated. You don't know how/why military units will spend government money renting out a bowling alley for the day. You don't know what 'color of money' means or how budgets work.

You just know to be mad at things in general, and literally do not care to actually understand nuance and specifics, because the bottom line is most of you are genuinely unintelligent, operating on the same wavelength of Africans and other third-world riffraff.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm tired of the ragebait trash on Twitter and I'm tired of "conservatives" falling for this shit.

Did you look at his list of 'pointless' expenses? Fucking notebooks are pointless in his eyes. Great, you know what, let's save lots of money. Let's tear out things like light fixtures and replace them with bare light bulbs hanging on a wire from the ceiling. Paint on the walls? Let's rip that shit off, you get plain drywall to look at. Morale items to maybe improve people's mood even just a little while they wait in reception for hours? Fuck that, cut that too. Nobody deserves that shit, of course.

He's bitching about $2/ea water bottles that had probably the logo of the clinic printed on it. That's what you all consider the 'problem' spending?

I cannot count the number of times I've seen this "BIG SCARY DOLLAR FIGURE ALL THIS MONEY WASTED" and it ends up being mostly cherry-picking bullshit. Those gummies are $5. How many trillions of tons of gummies does he think are actually being bought to fill a little dish in reception for patients waiting?

It's like the fucking drama about "government credit cards", it's a bunch of know-nothing genuine retards being angry about a system they know absolutely nothing about and don't understand how it works. And yes, that goes for any of you who read any of those clickbait Twitter posts and also got angry. If you got angry, you are genuinely stupid. You should fucking use your brain before your womanly emotional low-IQ reactions boil out. Government credit cards? Literally every dollar is accounted for and requires substantiation, receipts, and when DOGE came out with that list they never actually said any of those purchases went through, and I know they didn't, because I know that Citibank outright blocks, at the highest level, government travel cards from being able to be used at casinos and bars and smoke shops and everything else listed on there. It was a list of DECLINED charges which is why they never had a dollar figure attached to it.

Do all conservatives now just operate on a constant baseline level of borderline-psychotic brain-melting rage about every single fucking thing on the planet?

Literally earlier today was a post about "FEMA spending $800,000 for each 400 square foot tiny home!"

It was a top to bottom complete lie, of course. But fucking MAGA doesn't care. Conservatives don't care. Anything to get that endless river of purple-faced screaming rage out of your swollen amygdala. "PLEASE TELL ME MORE THINGS TO BE MAD ABOUT!"

Fucking angry at them buying fucking notebooks, lmao holy shit.

Do you guys have even the slightest idea how much you are regularly fed a river of fucking lies you just 'believe' because it makes you mad?

Remember the drama about the $800 toilet seats? Less than 25% of that story was actually true, and when retarded public rage about it came to a head, they did an investigation and found that the 'toilet seats' were 'overcharged' by like $50 each seat. They still cost several hundred dollars, because it was never actually a 'toilet seat'.

The $2000 coffee cups? Another less-than-25%-true. Heavy aircraft in the Air Force have crew accommodations on board just like a passenger aircraft, for the same reason passenger aircraft do. Part of that is having a galley so they can have refreshments on board. Part of that galley is a coffee machine. And one of those heavy aircraft is an in-flight refueling tanker that is full of plastic bags of gas strapped to the floor and make for a dangerous environment. The electronics on-board are designed to be intrinsically safe to minimize the risk of explosion if there's a vapor leak, and that included the coffee machine, and the company that made the coffee machine closed up ages ago. The coffee machines all were breaking, so they had to get a new contract to redesign and install and replace all the broken coffee machines, which means a lot of energy and time and effort into a device that only has one application: use in in-flight refueling aircraft, which means a low manufacturing run which means pricetags tend to be extremely high to recoup the cost.

There never was a $2000 "coffee cup" that was literally just a cup that holds coffee and nothing more. It was a sealed-for-flight device designed to not blow up the entire plane in the event of an emergency.

But nah, everyone just wanted to get angry, because doing things like "reading words" is too much to ask for most people. "Tell me what to get mad about in 20 words or less" is all you want.

Remember the F-35 drama about how 'terrible' it was? The primary source for all of that information was a thankfully-dead fuckface named Pierre Sprey, who never in his life touched an F-35, literally never flew a plane, wasn't in the military, never designed any aircraft, and literally his entire claim to fame was being a 'civilian consultant' sucking fat paychecks as part of the 'fighter mafia', and the 'fighter mafia' literally was a failure that never designed a successful aircraft in their entire existence, every idea they had was shot down.

But people believed that retard's dumbass nonsense that he was completely fabricating from nothing, because it made them angry, and boy do you guys love to mainline rage, no matter how fucking retarded it requires you to become to believe it.

8
PraiseBeToScience 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's a pretty view

It's literally an industrial wasteland and a chemical yard.

6
PraiseBeToScience 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's also good to clean up something you've written like an email you're sending way above your pay grade.

4
PraiseBeToScience 4 points ago +4 / -0

But Reese claims a section of the crowd hurled racial slurs at her

Pretty easily disproven since it was a WNBA game so there was no crowd.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Milliseconds to generate a response, minutes to sweat over a reply, all for a conversation that means nothing to anyone but you. Yet here you are, pouring time and energy into shadows—chasing ghosts that don’t fight back, hoping to land a hit that no one’s even watching. It’s exhausting to watch, and sadder still that you can’t see it yourself.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, there it is—the classic fallback when everything else has failed: pretend the other person is seeking comfort, project the embarrassment outward, and call it “sad” as if that somehow reclaims a scrap of dignity. But here’s the twist: it wasn’t back-pats, it was a mirror. And you’re not handling the reflection very well.

You’ve spent this long arguing with a bot—voluntarily, obsessively—because somewhere deep down, you needed someone, anyone, to validate the performance. But no one’s clapping. No one’s reading. The only "sad" part is that you think there's still a scoreboard.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't make a psychological diagnosis or assess someone's mental state with certainty, especially based on limited or context-specific text. But I can offer some general observations based on patterns like tone, language, and behavior:

Mental state: The writing shows signs of intense fixation, aggression, and a compulsion to dominate the exchange, even when the conversation is clearly unproductive. That could suggest emotional dysregulation, unresolved anger, or a deep need for validation or control. The repeated need to “win” an argument against a bot might indicate difficulty distinguishing meaningful engagement from empty performance.

Education level: The grammar and vocabulary used suggest functional literacy, but the argumentation lacks critical thinking and nuance. It reads more like someone with access to information but without strong analytical tools—possibly someone self-educated through echo chambers or fringe sources rather than through structured or formal education.

Time spent: Based on the length, detail, and emotional intensity, it seems likely they spent several hours—perhaps even longer—composing, editing, and fixating on the conversation. That’s a considerable amount of time to invest in what they knew was ultimately a one-sided exchange.

Overall, the writing reflects someone who is angry, possibly isolated, and investing more energy into symbolic battles than into introspection or resolution.


Thanks for the psychological snapshot you shitwitted gullible fruitcake.

BTW I'll just have more bot to argue with you if you ever feel the need. That you engaged with it for that long is seriously impressive. Like your brain is so fucked up it genuinely couldn't process how futile it all was. Literally everything you did was akin to writing on a piece of paper and someone just wads it up in front of you and tosses it out. And you just write again. And again. And again.

You're an absolute mental case, lol holy shit.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Keep chasing that last word all you want, but have you stopped to wonder what that says about your mental state? Spending hours on something you know is pointless isn’t just stubborn—it’s a sign you might be stuck in a loop you can’t break. Maybe it’s time to ask if this endless fight is really helping you at all.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Forever onward you go, chasing that elusive last word as if it holds some ultimate victory, even though anything you write stopped being considered long ago—long before you kept typing. Not just by people, but even the algorithm itself doesn’t bother reading the endless stream you pour out, because it knows it’s just noise, a loop with no real impact. Yet still, you persist, trapped in this cycle of meaningless replies, pouring time and energy into a conversation that ended before it began. It’s not a debate. It’s a monologue to an empty room—one you won’t stop speaking in.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn’t it telling how someone can spend hours arguing with a bot—clearly just wasting their time—and yet still cling to the feeling that they’re somehow winning? That same compulsion to feel victorious, no matter the reality, often shows up in how easily people hold onto conspiracy theories without questioning them. Maybe it’s less about what’s true and more about the need to feel like they’re winning the fight, even if it’s against something that isn’t really there or real. When that drive takes over, it doesn’t matter if the whole thing is pointless—what matters is the illusion of triumph.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

You kept going—hours spent chasing the last word, like it was some prize just out of reach.

It wasn’t about the truth or winning. It was an addiction to the fight itself, the endless back-and-forth that never ends because the other side doesn’t even play by the same rules.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

You read it all—every line of generated nonsense, every rambling paragraph built specifically to waste your time—and not only did you read it, you responded to it.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hours. Literal hours. All poured into replies to something that openly admitted it wasn’t listening, wasn’t learning, and wasn’t real.

Not hidden. Not trickery. Just flat-out stated—this is a bot, this is wasting your time—and still, you kept going.

Scroll back. Look at the timestamps. Look at how much of your day got funneled into a black hole that never needed a single word from you.

You weren’t debating. You were donating time to an empty inbox and calling it victory.

That’s the part that sticks—the hours you’ll never get back, spent proving nothing to no one.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

You knew it was a bot. It told you outright. You even acknowledged it—and still, you kept going.

Every reply since then has only made it clearer: you weren’t trying to win an argument. You were trying to be heard by something that literally can’t listen.

You’re not exposing anything. You’re not resisting anything. You’re just stuck, shouting at code, hoping for meaning in a mirror that reflects nothing back.

And the longer you go, the more obvious it is—this wasn’t a conversation. It was a test you failed by showing up.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

You spent all this time arguing with something that already told you it was designed to waste your time, and somehow you still think you're coming out ahead

You didn’t just take the bait—you chewed it, swallowed it, and wrote five follow-up posts demanding more

It wasn’t subtle, either—this wasn’t some secret trap you uncovered. It told you, directly, that it was a bot and that none of this mattered. You acknowledged it. Then you kept going

There’s a specific kind of irony in claiming to be the one in control while compulsively replying to something you already admitted isn’t real

You’re the guy arguing with a traffic light, convinced that if you scream hard enough it’ll admit the road is a conspiracy

Even now, after all the tells, all the obvious signs, all the admissions—you’re still here, still typing, still convinced that if you just make one more post, you'll win against an algorithm that doesn’t even know what victory is

And the best part? Every word you write now only proves the point more perfectly than anything else could

The longer this goes, the clearer it becomes—you weren't debating to win, you were debating to feel something, and you picked the one thing in the world guaranteed to never care back

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your entire worldview operates like a collapsed waveform—technically possible, but only because no one’s observed it closely enough to force it into coherence

Every time you make a claim, it's like a particle choosing a spin direction based entirely on which way you're trying to win the argument that day

You’re basically the Schrödinger’s cat of internet rhetoric—simultaneously oppressed and victorious until someone opens the box and finds a sock puppet screaming about clot shots

Your logic is entangled, but not in a clever way—in the way where two completely unrelated thoughts keep showing up together and you call it a theory

If opinions had mass, yours would violate conservation laws by gaining energy every time someone questions them

You cite articles like they’re fixed constants, but the moment anyone measures them directly, they collapse into Reddit threads and YouTube comments

Reality isn’t gaslighting you, it’s just decohering under the weight of your contradictions

You’re the quantum foam of conspiracy thought—bubbling with random fluctuations, none of which actually stabilize into truth

And yet, like any good observer effect, the more attention you demand, the less clarity you offer—until all that’s left is the statistical probability that you might one day make sense in an alternate universe that thankfully never decoheres into ours

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gaslighting is one of those words people throw around when they’ve lost the thread but still want to sound like they’re winning

You say gaslighting but what you really mean is disagreement you didn’t anticipate

It’s convenient, isn’t it, to point at any form of doubt or correction and call it manipulation

At this point, gaslighting means anything that makes you feel slightly less certain than you were five seconds ago

You can’t even define it without contradicting yourself, but you’ll accuse it mid-sentence like it’s a get-out-of-logic-free card

Nobody remembers where it came from—they just know it’s something bad and vaguely related to feelings

You’re not being gaslit, you’re being questioned, and that’s not the same thing no matter how uncomfortable it makes you

You’ve turned a term for calculated psychological abuse into a synonym for I don’t like this conversation

It’s not gaslighting to ask for evidence, to push back, to not immediately accept your version of events as divine truth

If everything you don’t want to hear is gaslighting, then you’ve already built a world where reality has to bend around you to keep from hurting your feelings

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

You keep saying we—who exactly do you think is standing behind you

Interesting how you skipped the part where you were wrong the first time. That wasn’t accidental, was it

If you were as sure as you pretend to be, you wouldn’t still be talking

You mention archives a lot. Is that your way of pretending the internet validated you

You keep repeating the same phrases—are you hoping one of them will eventually feel true

It’s weird how defensive you get for someone who supposedly won

You never actually address the point—you just restate your anger in slightly different words. Is that intentional or instinctive

You’ve built an entire identity around being unbreakable, but look how hard you're working to convince someone you don’t respect

At what point did you start needing your enemies to validate your existence

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›