13
icockmyglock 13 points ago +13 / -0

When news came out that T_D's subscription numbers were being suppressed I did a quick analysis of the highest subscription subs both defaults and non-defaults and the amount of posts they generated per day. Then I used that data to extrapolate a possible real subscription number for T_D. The figure I came to was +6 million subscriptions. For a non-default sub that's a YUGE number.

But the banning of T_D it just a small portion to the numbers of users that Reddit has purged in the months since T_D.

Personally I think until recently, Reddit was using the purges to pump their user numbers since most of those people will just recreate accounts. However, about 2 months ago all of my accounts on Reddit that had either suffered a one sub or multiple sub ban were banned site wide as well as my sleeper accounts laying in wait to be used. Those accounts were created using different browsers in private mode on different machines using different IP addresses. The only common factor was the VPN I was using for creating them so it must have been a VPN wide ban.

If you haven't noticed, .win is growing. Activity is increasing. I think the admins are realizing they've gone too far and are creating their demise.

5
icockmyglock 5 points ago +5 / -0

By the tenth booster I'd expect the patient to either be dead or a creature from Cronenberg World.

7
icockmyglock 7 points ago +7 / -0

Meanwhile if your 3yo wants to cut his dick off after watching Elsa vidros, well that's ok.

12
icockmyglock 12 points ago +12 / -0

Don't let the fact that google is by default showing a preference for the CDC when giving advice for a life threatening weather go unnoticed. It's literally a double fuck you: We don't give a shit if you die, take the vax bigot!

3
icockmyglock 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder if they're going to start with the Japanese Health Minister. That should be interesting. I'll get some popcorn.

3
icockmyglock 3 points ago +4 / -1

I don't have a problem if he were doing something illegal. He wasn't. He did something that offended the sensibilities of a corporation. That's the quintessential definition of fascism folks. Mussolini would be proud.

5
icockmyglock 5 points ago +5 / -0

It shows where her cultural loyalties are. I can't say I believe voting is at all legit given how many foreigners Canadians have "elected", but if they are, WTF are you electing them? How many examples do you need to see that they promote their own culturally advantageous policies over your own?

3
icockmyglock 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's amazing how black people rioting, looting, burning down cities, murdering people doesn't spread covid, but white people obeying the law supporting their economies does.

4
icockmyglock 4 points ago +4 / -0

My GF asks why I'm re-reading sci-fi that I've already read. This is as good as any explanation as any for the current year.

13
icockmyglock 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's already happening in France.

2
icockmyglock 2 points ago +2 / -0

The horse paste comes in an application tube. The tube has a plunger segmented in 250lbs increments each divided by 5 notches in 50lbs increments. If you can add and subtract you can safely dose yourself. No conversions necessary.

I think the claim of overdoses, while possible, are being blown way out of proportion. Remember, if ivermectin is proven to be effective then the EUA's will be revoked. That's why they don't want people using it, but that cat is already out of the bag.

1
icockmyglock 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the FDA ever admits ivermectic in a treatment for covid then the emergency authorization for mRNA gene therapies will be revoked.

I give it two, maybe three years before the FDA even begins looking at claims that ivermectin treats covid.

4
icockmyglock 4 points ago +4 / -0

What about shareholders. Are they shunning shareholders who refuse the vax?

1
icockmyglock 1 point ago +2 / -1

You expected anything different in the current year? I'm more disappointed that you watched it to find that out instead of already knowing.

7
icockmyglock 7 points ago +7 / -0

True. I know several people who have lost friends and family, mostly because I don't have lots of friends or family. But I also personally know people who have had covid and have survived.

8
icockmyglock 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, no where, but can you imagine it?!? Statistically, people under 20 have more to worry about driving to school than being harmed from covid.

I think I'm ok with a virus that slightly increases the mortality of older people. Anyone that gives a shit should be able to offset that by working to become healthier.

5
icockmyglock 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was going to point out that it's an easy mistake to make. But then, no fuck it. This guy is a "professional" and no doubt bringing his employer some sweet sweet tax credits for being employed.

3
icockmyglock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Liability is a complicated matter. Congress waived liability for the pharmaceuticals. If the FDA grants approval, I don't believe anyone assumes liability for adverse effects of the vax.

However, if the FDA approves the vax, then liability could be assumed by employers, but not in the manner you're thinking. Employers would likely be liable for having employees who are not vax "infecting" other people, never mind that the vaxed can also infect others. We live in clown world.

Noone is going to be liable for the vax injuring you. The Biden administration is considering changes in the way it reimbursed hospitals for treatment of the unvax. What that means, they didn't elaborate, but I would guess it means they won't. If the government won't reimburse that also means insurance companies will have standing to also not cover injuries from covid if the person is unvaxed, my guess.

4
icockmyglock 4 points ago +4 / -0

All the talk by news, leaders, msm, social media is that approval is just a formality at this point, De Blasio making the misnomer that the "voluntary phase" is over......which leads me to believe, with all of their blustering and threatening people to get the vax ahead of approval that the FDA is likely not going to approve it. I've played enough poker to recognize a bluff, but I could be wrong. Otherwise, why are they literally threatening unconstitutional acts ahead of approval. Why not wait for approval to give them added legal standing?

Feels like a bluff.

12
icockmyglock 12 points ago +12 / -0

There is a bit of tinfoil in that positing, but the more relevant issue is the facilities being built world wide to quarantine people. No less than 4 western countries are outed as building such facilities.

Unless you're excited about getting 3 or more vaccine shots every year for the rest of your life, then this should be concerning to you.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›