so strange...in order to fine you
- STRANGE, adjective [Latin] - "not domestic; belonging to others".
a) as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) it's flow that represents the natural order for the form within...not the suggested orders by other form.
b) as "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance...choice is domestic within perceived balance (need/want); not within suggested imbalance (want vs not want) by other choices.
c) FINE, noun [ Latin finis] - "agreement between persons" aka choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which ignores balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law. Also; person (per sonos aka by sound) implies that choice represents the resonance (need) or dissonance (want) to perceived origin of sound.
fines you $300
It's $330.00...(33).
Just more puppets to enact a constantly repeating narrative; while hiding it under slightly different allegories.
a defense of either
It is consent to any suggestion (-ism) that causes the offense. Any suggestion towards your choice tempts "want or not want" consent. If you chose either; you find yourself within the want versus not want conflict (reason). Whatever side you chose will then tempt you to defend yourself against the other side.
That is called division (reason) by suggestion (-ism). Meanwhile in reality...choice represents the response to balance (need/want); which is what the many ignore when falling for the temptation (want over need) of suggestion (want or not want).
Communism; fascism; capitalism; socialism; idealism; feminism; veganism; scientism; metamorphism; individualism and every other suggested -ism are all representing the same foundation of choice...want or not want; hence want over need (temptation of ignorance). Tricking the many into this represents choice (suggesting) to choice (consenting) contract law; which is ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
The mass industrialization of the aforementioned contract law (choice to choice) is called RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.] and the main tool to suggest represents spell-craft aka suggesting idolized meaning (words) over perceived meaning (sound).
Suggested his-story by the few; which aims to explain "understanding" aka standing under suggested information by others; while ignoring to grow comprehension within self by adaptation to perceived inspiration.
Question if "forming within mind" (conceive) is done by choice, and then question if choice represents the response to balance...instead of to the suggested choices by others.
Shakespeare
"to be or not to be"? My ass...."to be" implies "out of"; hence as choice in response to balance. As for William...indeed; WILL I AM.
more akin to fascism than communism.
Question if all -isms are suggested by the same parasitic few towards the ignorant many who are being deceived into choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law?
the banks (plural) are still technically separate entities
Banks that hold the suggested currency (money); while the many ignore the real current aka flow (inception towards death) for the responding form (life) in-between.
Ask yourself why the parasitic few suggest currency; liquidity; (river)banks; floating loans; freezing assets etc. (water allegories)?
I cannot conceive you.
- CONCEIVE, verb transitive [Latin , to take.] - "to receive into the womb, and breed".
You don't have to...my mum already did.
don't want to be associated with genocide, while being nazis
What if those who suggest genocide by vaccine, and those who suggest that resisting it makes you a nazi; as well as those that claim genocide and those who suggested the brand nazi...were so called ashkenazi?
I would have the upper hand by resisting the temptation of consenting to suggested fights. You fight for outcomes (beating others), hence consenting to self destruction while doing so; I utilize martial arts for self sustenance; hence within momentum (balance); while resisting temptation (imbalance).
I'm always ready for sparring tho.
What if using suggested contradictions keeps both sides in conflict with each other?
calling for the gassing of jews
What is the implication of questioning the gas chamber narrative; while "calling for the gassing of jews"?
Using a 103kb jpg to distribute a virus over a public image hoster...classic cyber-warfare. I could post the big dipper as ASCII art; but spending some quality moments outside under the big swastika in the sky could improve your "well being". If that doesn't suit you; I could teach you a lot about the "Hakenkreuz"; because my hook & cross are said to leave a lasting impact...
Did you also complain about TheDonald representing a communist sub? What do you call bailing out banks but communism?
a giant swastika
If that offends you; then this is gonna be awkward... https://pic8.co/sh/bA2aBG.jpg
antiwar
The few suggest "war" to deceive the many to consent to "want or not want" the suggested war; which a) causes want vs not want division among those consenting to the suggestion and b) is what allows wars to be utilized to racketeer all the want vs not want conflicts caused by simple suggestions.
Over half a century and counting of suggested "abortion" is running smoothly only because the majority consents to want (pro-choice) versus not want (pro-life) the suggested abortions.
Instead of consenting to anything "anti" vs "pro"; why not use choice to sustain self; while resisting the temptations suggested by others. In other words...instead of choosing want vs not want (imbalance); why not choosing need over want (balance)?
If we had a real media
Media; noun [Latin medius, middle.]...the middle between perceived inspiration and grown comprehension out of it represents suggested information by others; hence media for enter tame mind (entertainment). The real middle represents one being choice in response to balance (need/want).
Balance represents the momentum of flow (inception towards death) for the form (life) within.
I don't understand why nobody
a) using don't (do nothing) and nobody (nothing body) implies ignorance of perceived everything for suggested nothingness. One cannot perceive "nothing" for perception implies being in response to everything perceivable.
b) to choose suggested (information) over perceived (inspiration) implies the choice to ignore need for want; and the consequence of ignoring perceived implies lack of comprehending it. Believing the suggested information by others does not grow ones "under-standing"; it deceives one to "stand under" the will of another. An inversion by suggestion.
The nature we exist in does not communicate itself as suggested information; instead it moves everything; which those within perceive as inspiration for their choice to respond to.
Nature (movement) causes a balance (momentum) to which everyone within represents the responding choice. The response to perceived inspiration represents need/want (balance); while the consent to suggested information represents want vs not want (imbalance).
From a different perspective...the parasitic few suggest information as words; for which the many ignore perceived sound. Words are shaped by choice out of perceived sound; then suggested as idolized meaning (information) towards the consenting choices of others. Therefore...suggested information (fiction); perceived inspiration (reality). Words equal spell-craft aka a parasitic suggestion in-between perception and comprehension.
Dis-information is based on contradicting consented to information. Only what the many consent to believe represents truth can the few contradict as lies.
Illuminati; from illuminate (to enlighten) aka enlightenment (to enlighten the mind)...an allegory for comprehension (need) over ignorance (want) aka ones choice of need over want.
Comprehension can only be grown by ones choice to respond to perceived inspiration (need); instead of ignoring it for suggested information (want).
groups
The ignorant many are herded into suggested groups (unity); the parasitic few comprehend perceived unity; from unitas - "the state of being one; oneness". Brands such as "Illuminati" are used to suggest groups to those who ignored the state of being ONE within ALL. In other words...being part of the Illuminati implies ignorance of one being enlightened.
Only if each of the many ignores to be the ONE with the free will of choice within ALL; can the few who resist that ignorance be "the chosen ones" aka the elite (selection; choice). The few are chosen by the ignorance of the many who ignore being choice in response to balance.
"the longer route" implies the resistance of form (life) in response to being moved by flow (inception towards death); and "end up back at" implies ONEs (form) transmutation out of base ALL (flow) aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death). Also; it is ALL (flow) that differentiates itself into the ONEs (form) within. Why? To use perceivable differences to communicate inspiration for the sustenance of ONEself within ALL. If everything perceived would be the same; then what would inspire temporary form to struggle to sustain itself within ongoing flow?
Today we learned that when "free-will-of-choice" is used to respond to "questions for everyone"; then "schizophrenia" accusations will be used in an attempt to shut it down. Fascinating.
you gotta stop with the LSD, or at least lower the dose
What if instead of mind altering chemicals...a simply less restricted consciousness?
words...smart
SM'ART, noun - "quick". What's quicker...perceived sound or suggested words?
I see right through it
"It doesn't make sense; but I see right through it" ~LauriThorne
I want
Want implies ignorance of need...need sustains life; want tempts towards death. Your choice.
you, specifically
SPECIF'ICALLY, adverb - "according to the nature of the species". As in HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] What if flow specifies all the form within; which allows responding form to shape self by choice based response to?
to go away
Aka towards (from inception towards death) go (form animated by flow) a way (flow aka the one way for all the resulting form within). See, I'm already on the way.
That entire paragraph was utter nonsense.
Seeing it; reading it; responding to it; even ignoring it implies use of senses. Nonsense implies your ignorance of perceiving everything through your senses; for the suggested inversion called "nothing" (non). There's no nonexistence within existence; unless one pretends to be; while ignoring what is.
said nothing at all
What if you perceive everything; lack comprehension about most of it; while corrupting it further by believing in suggested nothingness?
all these words
What came first...perceived sound or suggested words shaped out of perceived sound; then suggested as information in exchange for consent by others to ignore perceived inspiration?
Does nature use words to communicate itself? Ever heard "I'm a tree; stop pissing at me?"
to say nothing at all
How can ONE within ALL aka one thing within everything express nothing?
You type out entire paragraphs
That's just me adapting to whatever inspires for the sustenance of self; while more or less using the limitations of a public forum to keep it short. What others shape out of it is based on their free will of choice.
I'm trying to get you to go away
That's called a suggestion of information; which for others represents the temptation to ignore perceived inspiration for. What if you resist the temptation to respond to what you not want; while questioning what you need? As in...do you need others to get away; or do you want others to get away. The conflict between wanting vs not wanting others to go away is caused by your consent to the suggestion of others; yet I didn't suggest anything; I responded to a "question for everyone" while using it for inspiration; which seems to be a thorn in your side...
HOB'BY, noun - "a stick, or figure of a horse, on which boys ride".
What are you trying to lure me into here? https://pic8.co/sh/B6uycb.jpg
get back on your meds
MED'ICINE, noun [Latin medicina, from medeor, to cure.] + CURE, noun [Latin , to cure to take care, to prepare.]...how does choice balancing within an ongoing momentum prepare itself for wanted outcomes; when in need of constant adaptation?
without your polluting the thread
Question for everyone leading to response by ONE within ALL causing another one to feel POLLU'TED, participle passive - "defiled; rendered unclean; tainted with guilt; impaired; profaned".
Babe; are you trying to pull a #metoo on me? How about taking a bath instead?
Everything was much nicer
Consider the following..."You know it seems the more we talk about it"..."It only makes it worse to live without it"..."But lets talk about it"..."Wouldn't it be nice?"
'Renting till it Hertz'