The fact that the mother's absenteeism requires the hiring of a nanny is an oddity that goes just as unexamined in the movie as in Heretic's post, funnily enough. In retrospect, I guess this came out at a time when the idea of criticising a suffragette for being a suffragette was absolutely out of the question. Still, I think the absence of any implied criticism for the mother is not necessarily support for her lifestyle. I maintain she is depicted as faintly stupid and ridiculous: 'We are all going to throw things at the prime minister!' 'I am off to lead my imprisoned sisters in song...!' ...These are the daily activities that keep her from her children.
Still, there's a part in the dad's song where she says to him 'the children are missing!' and he just responds 'splendid, splendid' because he's too preoccupied singing his own song about his life. But a similar example happens in her own song about votes for women, where the (old) nanny tells her the kids are missing and she ignores it.
She is present in the finale, where the family have an outing together at the park to fly a kite, in a song which is once again led by the father George. I had forgotten that George even gets his job back in this scene. As Heretic says it really seems more like the message is about family cohesion. EDIT: holy shit, she even takes her 'Votes For Women' sash and uses it as the improvised tail for the kite... I mean if we're talking messages... Or maybe she thinks it's good feminist advertising, idk, but it's obviously unreadable once the kite is in the air.
Before the long walk to his firing, Bert teaches the father about fatherhood and how he can connect with his children.
In the process of my own reply I also remembered this bit where Bert catches up to the kids after the fracas at the bank. The entire speech is sympathetic to a father's lot as a hard worker and a man's role as a silent sufferer and final fallback.
Who looks after your father? Tell me that. When something terrible happens, what does he do? Fends for himself, he does. Who does he tell about it? No one. He don't blab his troubles at home. He just pushes on at his job, uncomplainin' and alone and silent.
This part stuck somewhere in my psyche through the years and remains a good description of manhood, so this movie can't be all that subversive. It even starts playing George's song motif in the background on this bit. Highly sympathetic.
It's been a long time, but I seem to remember George Banks being a sympathetic character and the suffragette wife being depicted as a ditzy idiot, not 'quirky and admirable'. This guy is conflating George with the bank too much, yet they end up at odds.
I mean maybe it would appear subversive on rewatch, but I watched it a lot as a kid and I liked George Banks, I liked his songs, and I thought the wife was lame.
They sing the King Louie song inside their head.
~ I wanna be a jew, jew-schlub
stroll tunnels underground
and be just like the other heebs
I'm tired of goyin' around ~
~ oh OOHBEEDOO OY GEVALT! I wanna be a jew-ooh-ooh
I wanna walk like jews
talk like jews, too-ooh ... ~
...etc
Minority: You're sick if you don't love us.
Majority: We're healthy if you're gone.
If the minority is not lovable, seems like there's only one way to proceed.
This nigger's whole life is internet debates and he plays them like I play dwarf fortress, with 30 wiki tabs in the background. And he advertises said debates by being the most obnoxious cunt he possibly can be on social media. A complete and utter empty space of a human.
It only works when it's from right-wing black people and those are a minority, even more so when it comes to going out of their way to combat anti-whitism. Lefties, especially blacks, attack their own side easily and organically. It doesn't harm their momentum at all for an attention-seeking negress to force a white ally out of the limelight with racist insults, unless the insults are directed at the message itself.
Interesting tangent from twitter:
Almost perfect, but the actual game is careful to use "they/them" pronouns for Charlie for some undisclosed reason (although Amelia does get "she/her").
Response:
The game actually refers to male Charlie as "he" a single time: when he's visibly angry and upset and yelling loudly in the classroom at the migrant. The game never refers to female Charlie as "she"
Sneaky! They quietly kick you out of the non-binary club when you show toxic masculinity in the game. The deep-layered fuckery of this is that they don't do the same for those who pick a female Charlie - well obviously, because that would be misgendering!
The funniest part of this for me is that these might all be unconscious choices by mind-colonised propagandists.
I think the Fox one was a pic where she was getting out of a car or something and accidentally flashed the world- I don't consider those "upskirt". When I think of upskirt I think of someone intentionally trying to get a camera under there like that guy who put a little camera in his shoe and would then put his foot under women's skirts
Getting underneath somebody's crotch requires invading their personal space. They have deliberately conflated this kind of harassment with line of sight photography taken at a distance, of celebrities dressed like prostitutes who don't have the sense to keep their legs together when getting out of a limo (often deliberately, back in the day when they knew it would generate attention). The latter kind of photo used to be advertised on the front of tabloid newspapers to a readership of millions of people, yet now it's treated as a sex crime which will put you on an offenders' register, to an opposition which numbers zero people. That's how far the window has shifted in favour of insane feminism.
The core of the whole idea is the simp notion that women don't have to be held responsible for exposing themselves and that men should be criminalised for unwanted attention. You can draw a clear through line from that to revenge porn and the 'staring laws' on UK trains. Why shouldn't it be illegal to look at women in public when they don't want it, if it's already illegal to photograph them at a distance in public or re-publish nude pics which were legally obtained? None of this is done to 'protect women' - if it was, they'd receive protection from brown rapists rather than embarrassing AI shoops. It's done to create another lever to control insufficiently servile men and the internet.
Paparazzi upskirt photos of celebs existed for decades too. In currentyear, they will get you visited by the starmtroopers, even for reposting an old one as with Laurence Fox in the UK.
'Revenge porn' nonsense was the thin end of the feminist wedge used to hack the overton window out of the wall. They've successfully conflated image manipulation of women with the worst crimes on the planet now; in Ireland this was reported on the news as 'grok is making child porn images (so please turn up in Dublin for a protest outside the X offices later today)'. I could tell with the response to DignifAI that this was a line of internet freedom our supposed free speech champions won't be ready to cross for a loooong time, long beyond the oft-impotent pressure valve of allowing a bit of ranting about negros and jews.
I used to watch his show occasionally. His popularity was the real deal and he was pulling half a million live viewers on Rumble around the election, more than Crowder. With the exception of Israel, he was reliably incisive and entertaining on most issues and was pretty effective in his mockery and criticism of the previous admin. In some ways he was a bit like thedonald personified, so his chat was an unreadable fastscrolling wall of cheering boomers, but his own zeal seemed genuine and he also wasn't hesitant to examine possible foul play by glowies like the FBI and Secret Service. He kept hammering for further answers about the Trump assassination attempts and the Jan 6 pipe bomber.
The pipe bomber is the big one. Bongino wasn't typically an Alex Jones type throwing around wild speculation. So it felt significant that of all the things he got angry about on his show, he chose to single out the Jan 6 pipe bomber and go on about it repeatedly. He gave insight from his own secret service background and used that as a basis for saying that the entire official narrative was unbelievable. He went further and insisted that he thought it was an FBI false flag, meant as insurance if the other DC protests couldn't be used as a narrative; he said it was possibly the biggest scandal in the history of the FBI and that heads would definitely roll. He was literally a conspiracy theorist on this issue.
So it is remarkable and unrecoverable for him now to be going after those on the right who are demanding accountability from the administration. There is just no plausible way back for him into the world of political commentary because he hung so much of his credibility on issues like this, the pipe bomber especially. The only way back IMO is if he is now run like an op - with a fake chat, with bots, with narrative nudgers and with supplied talking points to damage control his shattered credibility and keep his mouth shut about whatever went on in his FBI tenure. And if that's the play now, I have to wonder if that's what was going on with him all along - that he was always a pied piper fed fake. I suspect not though, because it would have been easy for him not have laid a massive trap for himself by going after the pipe bomber story so hard, if he instead stayed focussed on safer ragebait for boomers.
The other most likely alternative is that getting close to power revealed to him just how much Israel runs things, and that he'll tell any lie and suffer any indignity to prevent others learning the same.
Somebody from the caribbean. Among the first waves of 20th century immigrants to come to the UK as part of the 'Windrush Generation'. Typically they're lower on anti-white hatred (compared to modern immigrants) and may even have some sense of pro-British patriotism due to being part of the commonwealth. Still they retain their shitty accent and latent anti-white resentment across the generations.
He's a boomer fighting to deprogram himself from a lifetime of red/blue tribalism and still uses 'conservative' lazily when he doesn't have another adjective. It's meaningless. He described the UK's George Galloway (a stereotypical oldie-socialist) as 'conservative'.
It was just another way of warning that globohomo will come to US-controlled Venezuela, which is an objective fact.
Tim Pool is doing apologetics for this move. Even Tucker is relatively mild on this, with a vaguely reprimanding Christian spiel about might doesn't make right but 'at least Trump is being honest! whatever happened now, it's done - I hope you guys know what you're doing!', and also just hosted Cernovich who is wholly supportive of kidnapping Maduro. Fuentes is full on Trump cheerleader now in his new flavour of the week. The assertion that several of the names you listed were not as critical of Biden as they are of the right is untrue, to put it mildly, except for Fuentes who is the most obvious fed. To the extent that ecelebs are relevant at all, you've ignored the weirdest glaring behaviour of some.
You sound like you're inside a fake online matrix and are a bit too terminally online yourself. If you like talking heads try the latest Clint Russell/Liberty Lockdown video, where he accurately points out the hypocrisy of practically everyone.
I don't know if it counts as a 'win' or whatever, but the KCD2 debacle was enriching in telling us everything we need to know about Daniel Vavra and certain 'anti-woke' influencers.
Baldie looks like Robert Barnes, who has the strongest Candace Derangement Syndrome of anyone, so it still works.
WE'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO COMPETE
fuck feminism and fuck this currybitch on comm immediately running interference
And I thought nobody could make feminism any more comedic for me. I thought the needle was already at 11. You described a simple reality in front of my eyes and pushed it to ????/infinity
'Ee make me to be naked on the street, ee don't fackin care.' I bet the guy in a 'supervisor' jacket with a notebook in one hand, surrounded by hard hat workers, spontaneously tried to rape her in the middle of a crowd in broad daylight, and it wasn't some bullshit like getting slapped for making a nuisance of herself and her tit popped out for a second.
From the comments it sounds like they were dragging away the passenger who died later, Zampella was still in the car and died possibly due to the fire.
I can't see where it says he watched any Saved By The Bell in there, so his story still adds up. His parents were just hardworking immigrants who didn't let him get infected by the white mediocrity of 90s sitcoms, nothing to see here.
Funny how you're downvoted to the exact same total as Imp, for this innocuous comment. Is some new retarded game beginning? Maybe don't start an obvious bot army flex just after you've been challenged for having nobody on your side.
Edit: lmao the downvotes are gone.Too late, I thought that might happen which is why I snapped it. What an annoying nigger.
Add to Kash's 'we need America to wake up and prioritise Israel' and you had everything you needed to know about their stewardship of the FBI before it happened.
Over the years I've seen a few streamer meltdowns on Twitch. One that happened a few years back was a British variety gaming streamer called Spamfish. Over the course of a mental breakdown brought on by loneliness and depression, he gradually torched his stream in multiple tearful bouts of crying and complaining and oversharing. At the stage when he was struggling to afford his rent and soon to be evicted from his place, he revealed that he had spent 5 figures online on onlythots. He confessed this in between random gibberish political rants about eg. Rishi Sunak's transphobia(?!), further revealing that his mind had been colonised by progressive cancer. It seemed obvious that he'd adopted more and more feminist talking points in the belief that it would make him seem like a good feminist ally, so that female twitch streamers in adjacent communities might touch his e-peen.
People are saying they find the OF spending hard to believe and that they never hear about it, but I'm willing to believe there are tens of thousands of stories like spamfish. Only his unhinged level of oversharing shed light on where his money went. With most guys you'd never hear about it. The simps problem cannot be overstated.