You can see how much healthier the dude is.
Imagine waking up to his former state and then most of these "trans" people say they're suffering dysphoria. Yeah cause you're fucking yourself up and your body is screaming no and for some messed up reason (we all know..) you're taking that as a cue to dive deeper or 41.
What I do love about this case, is its shown me very clearly which people I know are closet rabid feminists, which are just NPCs (regurgitation of talking points) and which are people that are afraid of the mob/don't want to reveal their non leftist thoughts.
Danger hair is a nice visual cue, but this has been amazing and separating them.
I suspected a few people I know who kept spouting leftist talking points and even they've come out against this antidepp bullshit. Not saying that I think they're clear of being deranged,but it does mean there's either hope or they're just following the sheep.
Also. Gamergate mentioned.
Rent. Free.
Yes. When changing hands. Don't get me wrong I didn't mean only taxed once ever in its creation.
They shouldn't be allowed for example earlier given, claim income tax on money, then claim inheritance tax when it's changed hands. That money was already taxed, multiple times before it got pooled together as a pot to be inherited. It also has lost value over the years compounding that tax effect to then be taxed again, likely at a greater sum.
Or for example as you said, Employer pays tax when they pay you, you pay tax when you receive it. Then you pay tax again when you buy an item, even tho the manufacturer will have already paid their goods tax for said item.
At present taxing isn't when it changes hands, it's when it changes "form". Their excuse is that it's only ever being taxed once, per person, for that reason. But that means they can claim two sets of tax for one exchange.
See https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2020/03/27/gibraltar-kicks-off-its-double-tax-agreement-with-uk-to-attract-big-money/ for an example.
Yes this is regarding changing countries and being taxed twice but the effect is still the same. What they do there is you are taxed based in the country where the work took place, instead of being taxed in both.
The same could easily be applied to income or money source.
10.1 Like double jeopardy, no double taxing the same money.
For example, no income tax, then sales taxing. Or Income taxing then inheritance taxing when it changes hands.
The money is taxed only once at the most relevant applicable rate.
All because they don't want to admit that, if humans prefer fake (anime) over real (them) .how shit must the real be.
Fact is, they're annoyed they're now having to compete. Too many women have over valued themselves as partners, are becoming spinsters and are now blaming competition with fakery.
This is where the "guns kill people, not people kill people" thinking comes from.
They lose self control when they hold one. They feel power. And because they're solipsistic in their thinking, but also cannot accept blame, they have to transfer blame to an inanimate object instead.
"I would never kill someone, but when I had the gun, I did. I wouldn't have been tempted if I didn't". - No, they were always tempted to kill someone, they just didn't have an easy out.
Anarchists are just children who believe they can be self sufficient but they lack the knowledge, drive or capacity.
Doomsday Preppers are their teenage equivalent. They have the capacity and drive, but often lack knowledge. "This tinfoil will protect me from rads!".
Nice to wind up the anarchos and "Preppers". All they are, are walking lootboxes.
As a slight aside. They're really butchering the storytelling, changing Smooth-Smooth Stones name to ... "smooth gem".
Outright TELLING the viewer what will happen if it's not returned instead of implying.
All the subtlety of a sledge hammer.
Yep, almost like what they've put in their vaccinations makes you susceptible to it ands its ilk.