The other KiA needs this message more than we do.
By some small miracle, it seems the current UK government are all for transforming the BBC into a subscription service. The crazy thing is that since the news the BBC has been embroiled in one anti-government scandal after another. I'd almost think they want to be defunded but it's more likely just hubris.
I guess we'll just have to hope that there are more than five porn sites on the internet.
Pretty sure there's more porn on the internet than just the PH network, and plenty of other "free" sites salivating over the chance to fill that kind of sudden gap in the market.
Just going to lay it out there but there are also more conservative antifems who are equally against porn.
Place de la République, Paris.
No idea about the condition of the person.
I don't see any references to "All Lives Matter" in this article.
If they make a game worth $70 then I'll buy it. The problem is people making a game worth $20 then pricing it at $70
When it's a conservative at those parties, silence = complicity. When it's a liberal, they were blameless.
Reddit has started automatically filtering .win text and links. No guarantee that you'd be able to post it there.
What happened to appreciating all body types, Polygon?
It was only ever about trying to guilt people into appreciating the unattractive ones.
The problems with public healthcare are rarely the amount of money they recieve, but rather what they do with it.
The endless bureaucracy and keeping an army of useless morons emplyed to pretend to manage something or other, while simultaneously never wanting to budget to improve the service are what causes issues. And throwing more money at that pit won't solve the problems.
I agree, but the only way they'll move is by choosing to do so themselves. Forcing them won't do anything.
This takes me back to the early stages of GG.
The only wise move was to not do anything. They were figuratively begging for the National Guard to come in so they get endless "Drumpf murders peaceful protestors" PR.
.....And?
I don't subscribe to this notion that bad words means the site will die. I'm just here saying that in the world of free speech and ideas there should be no room for censorship.
I wonder if you're trying to prove a point.
Because the fact that the guy refuting you got upvoted while you were heavily downvoted seems only to prove mine.
They have been for decades though.
Throw people out because they are legitimately problematic for the continued well-being of your house, store, business, kingdom.
That is literally the same line of thinking that the SocJus crowd, and really any censor in the history of the world. People are generally fine with letting anything continue until they feel it threatens their way of life.
I still firmly believe that you should let the community regulate itself and not restrict bad words.
You say that, but the BBC spend forever cozying up to the Labour Party.
Left leaning also doesn't mean blindly votes democrat.
I'd argue the opposite - that they've not experience true and meaningful hardship. So they have no reference point for just how pointless their "problems" are.
Last time the data was taken (admittedly a few years ago) the majority of us self-identified as left leaning.
But left leaning and patriotic aren't mutually exclusive.
As expected, the normal Twitter SocJus crowd are seething.