1
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 1 point ago +1 / -0

dude you can support him calling out Jews without ignoring everything else about him. you don't have to buy into this guy wholesale. remember when we had people saying fucking Nicki Minaj is a based black woman and secretly conservative, because she pushed back against COVID for a few days?

2
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 2 points ago +2 / -0

I definitely wanna see how far he can take this and how far he's allowed to take this.

4
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 4 points ago +4 / -0

listening to it again, you're right. not sure what I was thinking there.

8
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 8 points ago +8 / -0

Remarkably, the article does not refer to the boyfriend as a woman nor use female pronouns despite him declaring himself to be trans.

It is acceptable to "misgender" someone if it's an article about how he made a woman feel bad. Just like it is acceptable for news articles to hide the fact that a crime suspect is trans. I've even seen a recent article refer to a criminal as "a crossdressing man" (when I pointed it out, some trans activist replied saying "he isn't trans").

13
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 13 points ago +13 / -0

the tragic comedy of this girl never being able to move away from Libtard Land, no matter what life brings her way. still an "LGBTQ+ ally", still going to a therapist, still coping by writing an article for The Guardian.

4
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 4 points ago +4 / -0

also the actor they chose to play the black guy is clearly Indian, based on his accent

17
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 17 points ago +17 / -0

nowadays it's usually America mocking America in ads

37
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 37 points ago +37 / -0

standard leftist defense: "no it's not real this is completely made up" ➜ "why do you even care" ➜ "yeah but this isn't the gotcha you think it is" ➜ "well whatever it's not a big deal Trump did way worse" ➜ "nobody on the left even supports this anyway"

2
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 2 points ago +2 / -0

then I guess we agree. once you get past the spicy comments (both from me and from other people in this thread) you find that there's not much to disagree on.

groups have strong in-group preference, and the few that don't, really should (otherwise they will die out). it is unreasonable not to expect people to protect their own.

I also have my own share of stereotypes that I expect from Jews, black people, trannies, Indians, Muslims, whatever. I'm not above that (nor is it something I should be ashamed about). I'm just saying that when you have shit that's really beyond the pale like that contract from the OP, then some people are going to find it offensive enough to speak out. even people from groups that supposedly don't stand to gain from speaking out.

yeah there are always additional incentives like making money, but everybody knows that speaking out against this even as a Jew is risky to the point of being suicidal. anyone who is willing to push back gets my respect. at this point I don't even care if they're "based" black grifters or greedy Jews or feminists who have been knocked off their pedestal. perfect is the enemy of the good.

2
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 2 points ago +2 / -0

"jews are never fighting for you, at best they are fighting for themselves". that's paraphrasing, but it's the gist of what you and the other guy are saying. that absolutely means that she is guaranteed to be opportunistic simply on account of being jewish, and can't possibly be a good person to whites. that's what you're saying. stand by your words.

nobody deserves the status of protected group, least of all jews. but at the same time, there has to be a road to redemption for people as individuals. pattern recognition is fine - assume they behave like their group. but why attack the individual who doesn't?

13
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 13 points ago +13 / -0

so if she ignores it, she's evil and hates whites. if she protests it, she's evil and opportunistic. either way, as a Jew, she is personally responsible for the wording of that contract.

am I getting it right?

5
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 5 points ago +5 / -0

obviously "they", as in the ruling elites, didn't care. but normie leftists also didn't care when you pointed it out. they had no problem telling you that "it's different" or that "haha they're not really nazis"

30
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 30 points ago +30 / -0

they were okay with Neo-Nazis (actual Neo-Nazis, not the scary nazis that progressives pretend are everywhere), but not with religious Christians. really says a lot.

14
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 14 points ago +14 / -0

Ok reading this, makes the Democrats, Rinos and Deep state look worse

but only if you actually read. the average libtard is going to see "Trump was writing letters to Kim Jong-un" and go berserk.

1
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 1 point ago +1 / -0

this... doesn't seem like a big deal to me? today's adults are already being targeted with content that was previously considered childish. and they are actively seeking out this kind of entertainment. why would you not try and market to them with something they enjoy?

if you visit this place you probably have manchild hobbies, me included. and I'm not saying "there's nothing wrong with being a manchild" (hell no) but should you really be judging other people about this matter?

14
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 14 points ago +14 / -0

Haberman reported that an employee of JOHN MCENTEE, who served as Trump’s director of the Presidential Personnel Office, stuffed copies of photos of HUNTER BIDEN into an air conditioning unit at the White House, breaking it.

right off the bat we go from "air conditioning units" to "an air conditioning unit" and from "Trump officials" to "an employee of John McEntee".
furthermore, the source is Maggie Haberman, who is an analyst at CNN and previously at other places, including Politico (no disclosure in the article, of course). Haberman has a book coming out about Trump, so surely she has no personal motive to make shit up. Nor does Politico, which is shilling the book in this article and is her previous employer.

7
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 7 points ago +7 / -0

are we doing an early life check on her, or is this only a thing when it's convenient?

15
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 15 points ago +15 / -0

well, this is not a video I want to make

I highly doubt that. Looks to me that this woman was desperate for attention and an opportunity to virtue-signal.

26
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 26 points ago +26 / -0

Don't count on it. Western governments will never let you kill a mass data-mining platform that normies voluntarily sign up for.

by folx
1
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 1 point ago +1 / -0

"demonstrable medical issues", the same kind of "justification" often used to advocate for male circumcision in America.

1
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many of my favorite movies are in black-and-white. What I dislike is modern movies that are in black-and-white, just because. I think these movies are almost always worse because of it, and that it's a crappy decision for a director to make.

8
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 8 points ago +8 / -0

and despite how all of this guy's "talent" amounted to lifting entire melodies from other people's music, he famously threw a tantrum when Weird Al did a parody of Gangsta's Paradise. you know, one of those things that takes actual effort and ingenuity.

7
TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 7 points ago +7 / -0

...despite Trump supporting just about all COVID-related regulations, with the kind of relentless enthusiasm only a true boomer could possess, even after the fortified elections.

nothing is ever enough because it's always just a tool to personally target the people they disagree with.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›