2
Sumsuch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you have even the slightest clue of how you actually look in other people's eyes right now?

19
Sumsuch 19 points ago +19 / -0

This will hit trauma-informed, medical, advocacy, and human rights spaces the hardest

Is anyone surprised?

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair. It is hard for stupid people to understand that others might not want the same things they do.

6
Sumsuch 6 points ago +6 / -0

I feel like we ought to have some sort of system in place where a significant number of scientists can go over previous experiments again and again (based upon what is most important to society currently) both to confirm the initial results, and also to flesh out the findings, perhaps even discovering new nuances which were missed originally. People can complain that such research doesn't directly generate profits, but I would retort that avoiding the collapse of the entire system (which we are currently experiencing) is rather profitable.

3
Sumsuch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seems to me like a lot of unnecessary fuss just to wash your clothes.

I don't want someone else washing my clothes any more than I want someone else raising my kids.

4
Sumsuch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why do you figure that living in a mansion is desirable?

4
Sumsuch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Accidentally on purpose.

9
Sumsuch 9 points ago +9 / -0

You're gonna have to do something about those running your government if you want any say at all in where they go.

14
Sumsuch 14 points ago +14 / -0

First thing that jumps out to me is the phrasing, "women they claimed to have dated," I don't recall seeing similar phrasing when it came to the other site.

Well yea, men are much more open about the potential for dishonesty.

2
Sumsuch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huh, that's a rather odd subject to have scrubbed from the net. Apparently not even urban dictionary actually knows what the daily dose is.

For anyone unaware, it's a picture of Piccolo and Vegeta fucking which people used to post with messages like "time for your daily dose" in an attempt to build an association between the purple/green colour scheme and gay sex.

2
Sumsuch 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, the thing about One Piece is that a lot of people started following it when they were actually teens.

3
Sumsuch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Honestly, despite being a huge One Piece fan (or perhaps because of that) I wrote the show off on concept alone. One Piece has far too many outrageous physical effects which are actually important to the story, that can never be captured by live action, such as how character sizes can vary significantly throughout a scene to emphasize that character's impact upon the narrative at the moment. A lot of the physical comedy and timing has already failed to be translated to the anime, so the live action won't do that any better, being another 'animated' format.

All of that said, I'm actually happy that the live action exists. One Piece is as successful as it is largely because the story is not just good, but actually contains some really damn important philosophical concepts. If a certain percentage of live action viewers will find themselves drawn to explore those ideas in more depth, where otherwise they would never engage with such things, that would be great.

Also, apparently the legendary Studio Wit is producing a total remake of the entire anime with a strong commitment to making it top quality. So die hard fans do have something great to look forward to themselves.

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well it couldn't possibly be that the government is expecting all of humanity to completely change their entire way of living overnight. No, we've just got to single out those bad apples causing our perfect plans to fail.

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, that's basically interchangeable with golem, which they definitely are.

12
Sumsuch 12 points ago +12 / -0

Dude you think peasants in medieval times had it easier than you to have children?

Um, yes? Learn some damn history my guy. For pretty much all of history, having as many babies as absolutely possible was THE primary political strategy in the game of power (Hell, many modern societies are still fully committed to that strategy), and so it was made central to religious practices. The whole of society was focused on creating and supporting the next generation, very much unlike our current society which is focused on delivering fast food and hardcore pornography to drug addicts whoring themselves out online.

1
Sumsuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then the very instant people start buying that brand in larger numbers, they'll tank the quality to harvest profits before doing it again with another brand.

8
Sumsuch 8 points ago +8 / -0

Nullius in verba

"Take nobody's word for it" is effectively the pioneering mission statement of science.

What does its motto ‘Nullius in verba’ mean?

The Royal Society's motto 'Nullius in verba' was adopted in its First Charter in 1662. is taken to mean 'take nobody's word for it'. It is an expression of the determination of Fellows to withstand the domination of authority and to verify all statements by an appeal to facts determined by experiment.

https://royalsociety.org/about-us/who-we-are/history/

16
Sumsuch 16 points ago +16 / -0

HuniePop is pretty unique. It was one of the west's only solid nsfw GAMES before the troon madness ruined everyone.

2
Sumsuch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Drag uses excessive makeup to hide masculine features, so as society is allowing drag queens to define what a woman is, their definition pretty much requires excessive makeup.

4
Sumsuch 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can't wait for the algorithms to autoplay such videos for people who are actively trying to avoid such content.

2
Sumsuch 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've gotta watch that again. Bet it's on archive.org (yup).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›