-21
RealDrJester -21 points ago +3 / -24

So, some channels are enjoying the somewhat the same treatment anyone antirussia is getting in Russia. I thought they would like it. Weird... Oh well. Maybe Russia shouldn't be so censorious too...

-19
RealDrJester -19 points ago +4 / -23

Because the idiots want to do an SJW and blame the whole demographic? I don't like it when SJWs blame all whites as if it is a conspiracy against them, just as I don't like it when stormcucks blame Jews for their insecurities.

by folx
-1
RealDrJester -1 points ago +3 / -4

Good lord, you are so subversive and a lying piece of shitty scum that I find complete and total disdain.

Here's why GMOs are better, little to no pesticide.

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2018/02/19/gmo-corns-yield-human-health-benefits-vindicated-21-years-studies/

https://archive.li/df7dw

https://www.sciencealert.com/after-two-decades-and-6-000-studies-scientists-find-gmos-in-corn-are-actually-good-for-you

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2018/02/19/gmo-corns-yield-human-health-benefits-vindicated-21-years-studies/

Why organic is not that great

Joseph D. Rosen, emeritus professor of food toxicology at Rutgers, puts it even more strongly. "Any consumers who buy organic food because they believe that it contains more healthful nutrients than conventional food are wasting their money," he writes in a comprehensive review of organic nutritional claims13.

Further analysis of similar studies on livestock products like meat, dairy, and eggs also found few differences in nutritional content. Organic foods did, however, have higher levels of overall fats, particularly trans fats. So if anything, the organic livestock products were found to be worse for us (though, to be fair, barely).

. But factory organic farms use their own barrage of chemicals that are still ecologically damaging, and refuse to endorse technologies that might reduce or eliminate the use of these all together. Take, for example, organic farming's adamant stance against genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

For example, organic farmers apply Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin (a small insecticidal protein from soil bacteria) unabashedly across their crops every year, as they have for decades. It's one of the most widely used organic pesticides by organic farmers. Yet when genetic engineering is used to place the gene encoding the Bt toxin into a plant's genome, the resulting GM plants are vilified by the very people willing to liberally spray the exact same toxin that the gene encodes for over the exact same species of plant. Ecologically, the GMO is a far better solution, as it reduces the amount of toxin being used and thus leeching into the surrounding landscape and waterways.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/science-sushi/httpblogsscientificamericancomscience-sushi20110718mythbusting-101-organic-farming-conventional-agriculture/

Glyphosate is the most famous one, causing cancer, celiac disease, Parkinsons, and lots more.

Once again, wrong.

https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/glyphosate#:~:text=No%20risks%20of%20concern%20to%20human%20health%20from%20current%20uses,are%20more%20sensitive%20to%20glyphosate.

And rodale institute? This makes me wonder why shouldn't I quote Monsanto website...

You like to be WRONG all the time, don't you?

EVERY.

SINGLE.

TIME.

You are wrong. I see your opinion, 99% change it is wrong. Funny who you preferred to edit your reply and no write to me. Were you afraid I would do exactly what I just did and destroy your shitty argument? Subversive lying sack of shit. You bumbling idiotic mouth breathing moronic retard. I am certain now that you are an inbred who needs help tying your shoes in the morning. Since you stormcucks all know is project.

EDIT: More evidence of safety of Glyphosate. Apex is one of the most dishonest, shady and shitty stormcuck I have ever had the displeasure in meeting. He is the type of a salesman that will sell you a large 8 slice pizza, and give you a petri-dish sized pizza with 5 slices and no cheese.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515989/

Or just check these

Tomlin, C. D. S. The Pesticide Manual: A World Compendium, 14th ed.; British Crop Protection Council: Hampshire, UK, 2006; pp 545- 548.

RED Facts: Glyphosate; EPA-738-F-93-011; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1993.

Roberts, T. R. Metabolic Pathways of Agrochemicals-Part 1: Herbicides and Plant Growth Regulators; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 1998; pp 396-399.

Herbicide Handbook, 8th ed.; Vencill, W. K. Ed.; Weed Science Society of America: Lawrence, KS, 2002; p 231-234.

Roundup herbicide bulletin Number 1; Monsanto Agricultural Products Company: St. Louis, MO, 1980.

Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Glyphosate; EPA-738-R-93-014; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1993.

Giesey, J. P.; Dobson, S.; Solomon, K. R. Ecotoxicological risk assessment for Roundup herbicide. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 167, 35-120. SRC PhysProp Database: Glyphosate; Syracuse Research Corporation.

Shaner, D. L. The impact of glyphosate-tolerant crops on the use of other herbicides and on resistance management. Pest Manag. Sci. 2000, 56, 320-326. Franz, J. E.; Mao, M. K.; Sikorski, J. A. Glyphosate: A Unique Global Herbicide; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1997; pp 521-527, 604-605, 615. WHO. Data Sheets on Pesticides: Glyphosate; International Programme on Chemical Safety, World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1996.

Wu, J. Y.; Chang, S. S.; Tseng, C. P.; Deng, J. F.; Lee, C. C. Parenteral glyphosate-surfactant herbicide intoxication. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2006, 24 (4), 504-506.

Williams, G. M.; Kroes, R.; Munro, I. C. Safety evaluation and risk assessment of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate, for humans. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2000, 31, 117-165.

Bradberry, S. M.; Proudfoot, A. T.; Vale, J. A. Glyphosate poisoning. Toxicol. Rev. 2004, 23 (3), 159-167..

Bates, N.; Campbell, A. Handbook of Poisoning in Dogs and Cats - Glyphosate; Campbell, A.; Chapman, M., Eds.; Blackwell Science Ltd: Oxford, England, 2000; pp 135-138.

Monsanto Department of Medical and Health Sciences. Roundup and other gyphosate/tallowamine surfactant-containing herbicides: The clinical effects and their managment. Unpublished report, 1994, cited in Burgat, V.; Keck, G.; Guerre, P.; Bigorre, V.; Pineau, X. Glyphosate toxicosis in domestic animals: A survey from the data of the Centre National d'Informations Toxicologiques Veterinaires (CNITV). Vet. Hum.Toxicol. 1998, 40 (6), 363-367.

-31
RealDrJester -31 points ago +3 / -34

Point to me where I am defending them.

I asked if he being Jewish is a problem. I would ask the same if an idiot said "that dude is white". And I would love to know why that would be a problem.

But that is the thing with old school SJWs and new SJWs, they all sound the same. All are shit, the onlyt difference is the bag.

-37
RealDrJester -37 points ago +2 / -39

So you can't? Then why just say "he is a jew". That is like me going to r/news and seeing "This dude is white" and receive the same reply.

Are you an SJW by any chance?

-8
RealDrJester -8 points ago +1 / -9

Russian-Chinese

taas

Yeah, no.

China, the same place that blamed America for creating and releasing the CCP virus. And Russia, which has nothing to gain in blaming America for this...

-8
RealDrJester -8 points ago +2 / -10

You need to read the link you even shared. The author said that Ashkenazi Jews did not originate from Khazars, but some did convert.

And all the links, including u/CatoTheElder links show Jews are caucasians, ethnically jewish from the middle east region.

From Cato's and your source:

Gennady E. Afanasiev and his co-authors published the Russian article "Khazarskie konfederaty v Basseyne Dona" in Yestestvennonauchnie metodi issledovaniya i paradigma sovremennoy arkheologii: Materiali Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy koferentsii, Moskva, Institut arkheologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 8-11 dekabrya 2015 in 2015 on pages 146-153. They examined the uniparental markers of 4 individuals in the Saltovo-Mayaki culture of Khazaria who lived circa the 800s:

•Sample A80301 belonged to the Y-DNA haplogroup R1a1a1b2a (R-Z94) which is of Persian/West Asian origin and found today among Turkic-speaking Karachay people. A80301's mtDNA haplogroup was I4a which is found today in northwestern and central Europe such as in Sweden, and also found around the Black Sea, in the North Caucasus, and in Armenia, Iran, and Siberia.

•Sample A80302's mtDNA haplogroup was D4m2, which is found today in Siberia among the Dolgan, Yakut, and Even peoples, but is never found among Ashkenazim.

•Sample A80410 belonged to the Y-DNA haplogroup G, commonly found among peoples in West Asia and the Caucasus today.

•Sample A80411 belonged to the Y-DNA haplogroup J2a, which is also commonly found in West Asia and the Caucasus today, and also in Central Asia and in parts of Europe like the Balkans.

by folx
0
RealDrJester 0 points ago +5 / -5

Yep, that is a problem. Especially with retarded vegan parents who will prefer this over any animal food. Besides, there is a very high chance that the mother can't produce milk or her milk is deficient of nutrients if she is vegan. But overall, most of the weird names are that(vitamins), including food coloring.

-2
RealDrJester -2 points ago +3 / -5

Np.

I may be tiny, but I got a shout-out by the "Acquitted" game developer for debunking the triggered Kotaku article attacking them. So, overall, not bad!

by folx
-6
RealDrJester -6 points ago +2 / -8

No, breast milk lactose(sugar) is different from plant sugar. The other plant sugars, the body doesn't know trhe difference.

-4
RealDrJester -4 points ago +1 / -5

Yep, you are quoting the website I used to prove they are from Israel, and are caucasians...

Learn to read

This page collects Y-DNA and mtDNA data and analysis related to traditionally Rabbinical Jewish populations of the world, including: Ashkenazim (Jews of Northern and Eastern Europe) • Sephardim (Spanish and Portuguese Jews) • Mizrakhim (Middle Eastern Jews) • Italkim (Italian Jews) • Caucasian Mountain Jews (Dagestani and Azerbaijani Jews) • Georgian Jews • Indian Jews • North African Jews • Yemenite Jews • Ethiopian Jews


This page collects Y-DNA and mtDNA data and analysis related to traditionally Rabbinical Jewish populations of the world, including: Ashkenazim (Jews of Northern and Eastern Europe) • Sephardim (Spanish and Portuguese Jews) • Mizrakhim (Middle Eastern Jews) • Italkim (Italian Jews) • Caucasian Mountain Jews (Dagestani and Azerbaijani Jews) • Georgian Jew

Aka caucasian

Our analysis indeed revealed higher European admixture than predicted from previous Y-chromosome analyses.

Aka caucasian

The IBD segment sharing and the proximity of European Jews to each other and to southern European populations suggested similar origins for European Jewry and refuted large-scale genetic contributions of Central and Eastern European and Slavic populations to the formation of Ashkenazi Jewr

Aka caucasian

Southern European populations show the greatest proximity to Ashkenazi, South sephardic and Italian Jews, reflecting the large-scale southern European conversion and admixture known to have occurred over 2,000 years ago during the formation of the European Jewry. An apparent North African ancestry component was also observed as was present in the Sephardic groups potentially reflecting gene flow from Moorish to Jewish populations in Spain from 711 to 1492. ... Dr. Ostrer noted, 'The study supports the idea of a Jewish people linked by a shared genetic history. Yet the admixture with European people explains why so many European and Syrian Jews have blue eyes and blonde hair.'"

Aka caucasian

But the study also found strong genetic ties to non-Jewish groups, with the closest genetic neighbours on the European side being Italians

Aka caucasian

We have found that, in the vast majority of cases, Ashkenazi lineages are most closely related to southern and western European lineages - and that these lineages have been present in Europe for many thousands of years.

The findings bolster the mainstream view that the ancestors of European Jews were people from the Levant and local Europeans. An earlier, 19th-century theory posited that the core of the Ashkenazi Jewish population is descended from Khazars, from the Russian steppes, but the genetic evidence makes that even less likely, said study researcher Itsik Pe'er

Michael F. Seldin, Russell Shigeta, Pablo Villoslada, Carlo Selmi, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Gabriel Silva, John W. Belmont, Lars Klareskog, and Peter K. Gregersen. "European Population Substructure: Clustering of Northern and Southern Populations." Public Library of Science Genetics (PLoS Genetics) 2(9) (September 2006). Abstract:

Using a genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel, we observed population structure in a diverse group of Europeans and European Americans. Under a variety of conditions and tests, there is a consistent and reproducible distinction between "northern" and "southern" European population groups: most individual participants with southern European ancestry (Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Greek) have >85% membership in the "southern" population; and most northern, western, eastern, and central Europeans have >90% in the "northern" population group. Ashkenazi Jewish as well as Sephardic Jewish origin also showed 85% membership in the "southern" population, consistent with a later Mediterranean origin of these ethnic groups.


https://archive.ph/F6XJo

But do not worry, I collected the screenshot of you using a source you didn't read. I have it here, archived too.

by folx
-6
RealDrJester -6 points ago +1 / -7

Way, way, way more pesticides.

Want me to send you a list of the pesticides, FDA approved!

They are less efficient, more toxic too. Way more than the conventional ones. But I assume you don't care, since you are very antiscience.

by folx
-8
RealDrJester -8 points ago +1 / -9

Try organic, it has more pesticides :)

-14
RealDrJester -14 points ago +3 / -17

Thank you for confirming that Jews are caucasians, and ethnicity of the caucasians, and are not Khazars

I love you for doing all my work for me!

Thank you very, very much!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›