8
NotMacgyver 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's not even that good a pun. It will definitely not get laugh, even a "lol" would be difficult with it.

And not only that but you have so many other viable puns to make that this is downright insulting to comedy in general.

Also it should be mentioned that the billionaire in question died because of joining the ideology.

14
NotMacgyver 14 points ago +14 / -0

I didn't use to think so. Now I'm on the fence as some of them (and some "men") seem to need a reminder on the reasons we make concessions to avoid violence.

And anyone who thinks words are violence really needs a a good beating to properly understand the difference

by folx
29
NotMacgyver 29 points ago +29 / -0

I think no one should be topless in an event at the white house. Man or woman doesn't matter when it's suppose to be an official event at the white house I expect people to at least be able to keep their clothes on.

I expected a bit of decorum but I'm not american so for all I know the white house is just another word for a brothel, they certainly act like it is.

6
NotMacgyver 6 points ago +6 / -0

My guess would be some sort of unintelligible language that you couldn't understand a single word yet you would somehow perceive it's meaning perfectly unlike with human language where even if you understand the words you can miss out on some of the meaning behind them.

1
NotMacgyver 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm glad I didn't buy when I saw they dumbed down Ramlethal's gameplay. I like my pet classes damnit, setting my pets to the trigger them into assisting me is one of the styles I like the most in these types of fighting games.

So at the very least I managed to avoid all the strife in strive.

16
NotMacgyver 16 points ago +16 / -0

No wonder he looks pissed, he lost the only thing that was hiding that atrocious hairdo

8
NotMacgyver 8 points ago +8 / -0

So if everyone in my country agrees to burn down all the McDonald's could we then get the Russians to move in ?

6
NotMacgyver 6 points ago +6 / -0

Personally I like to eat McDonald's about twice a year. Sometimes you just want some junk food.

8
NotMacgyver 8 points ago +8 / -0

That is precisely why I have no sympathy for him. He had (presumably at least) all these people who loved him tell him to think about what he was doing and he still made the choice to do it.

At some point in the whole process he should have considered the implications of what a surgery, especially this kind of surgery, would mean and at that point it stops being the strangers on the internet's fault and starts being his.

He choose this so my sympathy is better going to the ones who tried to stop him for his own good. Then again in current year wouldn't be surprised if the parents and friends are the ones that convinced him to do it.

13
NotMacgyver 13 points ago +13 / -0

True enough I suppose. The people who misguided him into this deserve far worse fates than what he is going through (especially since he's probably not the only one they "helped") but at some point a person has to start making their own decisions.

I think at the point of the drugs I would still feel some sympathy since doctors give them out almost like candy and most people probably don't understand chemical reactions inside the body well enough (myself included). But when a doctor proposes something like...that. Most surgeries should already be considered affairs as things can always go wrong, and these ones more so as they are, for a lack of better term, outright butchery.

Maybe I just expect too much from a person who makes sweeping life choices like these and I should regard them as the mental npcs they are so often portrayed as

18
NotMacgyver 18 points ago +18 / -0

I mean if this person had put in the effort they would have known this would happen. I have no sympathy for willful self inflicted misery.

Live with the consequences of your actions.

10
NotMacgyver 10 points ago +10 / -0

Looks more pathetic than just making a VR horse riding game and using that.

I'm impressed at how pathetic they managed to make this and for what reason exactly ? So they can eat the horses instead maybe ?

2
NotMacgyver 2 points ago +2 / -0

If a woman then cheats....on herself? with another person does she then have to give herself half her possessions and can the state or bank tax her on such a transaction ?

Cause that would be fucking hilarious

8
NotMacgyver 8 points ago +8 / -0

This game does not include: -Jews -Blacks -Asians -Black Asians -Africans -Elon Africans -Fake Egyptians -Real Egyptians -Various extraterrestrials -Various Black extraterrestrials -Joggers -Non-Black Joggers -Clowns -Black Clowns .........etc

53
NotMacgyver 53 points ago +53 / -0

X rights are human rights.

It sounds great to the unprotected mind (x is part of the human race and they too deserve rights) but in fact is a complete lie.

Human rights are rights that apply to all humans so X rights are categorically not human rights as they apply only to X group and it is genuinely facepalm worthy everytime someone says that with a straight face

4
NotMacgyver 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wait so less female dialogue the better the game ? Good to know

Also if it's a % does that mean that if I make a game with only 1 line of dialogue and it's from the mythic unidentifiable thing called a "female" then I'd get 100% ?

16
NotMacgyver 16 points ago +16 / -0

You might think so but you see, that is an AR-15 style truck and that flag on the ground ? An AR-15 style flag.

See I speak retar...I mean journalist

by folx
7
NotMacgyver 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why stop at one princess ? Clearly Disney is a white supremacists, racist, misogynistic, buzzword, helicopterist, incel, terf loving, other buzzwords company that deserves to be the target of mostly peaceful protests against their vile revisionism of history.

Just look at all those black inspired characters and see how Disney changed them ! We Wuz Proncesseesss N Shiet.

Now go and peacefully protest at Disney while I go get some popcorn

8
NotMacgyver 8 points ago +8 / -0

Where can we fund a series of these 100% factual historic events ?

4
NotMacgyver 4 points ago +4 / -0

I still don't get why anyone who could stay at home, doing work that directly benefits you and your loved ones, could get conned into wanting to work a soul crushing slave wage job that is likely to shorten your lifespan due to stress related health problems.

I get how much the people behind the scenes probably pushed for it but that feminism was still seen as a positive is stupid and I wonder how much revisionism is going on when talking about the public opinion at the time, then again people are also dumb today so.....sigh human stupidity might be as constant as taxes and death.

8
NotMacgyver 8 points ago +8 / -0

Makes sense if you understand "take care" as ordering someone, or something in this case, to be murdered.

23
NotMacgyver 23 points ago +23 / -0

I'm disappointed...not at how idiotic this is but at how they failed to portray the Boogeyman that is the right wing gamer.

I mean he has a journalist hat, the little white thing on the fedora is typically associated with the press.

Also he isn't carrying even one gun.

Furthermore isn't this fat shaming ?

This person should be hunted down by the woke for not being woke enough

2
NotMacgyver 2 points ago +2 / -0

You probably won't get a response but have you tried to send the company an email directly asking them if this recruiter works with them ?

Add in that you are worried that this person is using their company's name to potentially scam people as the email you received is incredibly unprofessional.

You might get an answer back as generally it's not a good idea to get your company's name associated with scams or unprofessional behavior so someone might take the time to disavow the recruiter.

As for whether I would take the offer....well it's not worth considering before I can verify it's legitimacy so I'd probably base my decision on what kind of answer I get from the email to the company itself.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›