4
ItsOkayToBeWight 4 points ago +4 / -0

All holidays should be happy

Okay? Aside from holidays commemorating tragedies, I don't think anyone would disagree with this sentiment. I don't know what point they're attempting to make here.

"Happy holidays" is a dogwhistle for, "Fuck you, Christian". Many are well aware of the dogwhistle and call it out.

It's not "Happy Holidays", it's "Merry Christmas".

21
ItsOkayToBeWight 21 points ago +21 / -0

It sounds ridiculous to anyone that isn't aware of what is happening, which is why it's difficult to bring this up in casual conversation with a normie. You have to really break through the programming before you can discuss smaller points like this.

39
ItsOkayToBeWight 39 points ago +39 / -0

This is the goal. This is being done specifically because it will ultimately result in a lower birth rate. It sounds ridiculous to call this genocide, but we're dealing with death by a thousand cuts.

14
ItsOkayToBeWight 14 points ago +14 / -0

The great hamburger firewall.

by folx
8
ItsOkayToBeWight 8 points ago +8 / -0

Being a blob will do that to the endocrine system.

by folx
7
ItsOkayToBeWight 7 points ago +7 / -0

What until you hear about "fraysexual". They turned being a cumrag into an orientation.

4
ItsOkayToBeWight 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mulims are more aware of tricks used by another Abrahamic religion.

7
ItsOkayToBeWight 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's not cosmetic. If they don't their tiddy skittles they'll commit suicide. Actually they'll do that anyway but only nazis talk about post-transition stats. Giving people that threaten self harm everything they want can't possibly turn out bad in any way. Yes, that's what psychopaths do, don't think too much about it.

4
ItsOkayToBeWight 4 points ago +4 / -0

The three-strikes law championed by Clinton came about because judges were being too lenient on career criminal blacks. It was an enforcement problem where the law was selectively applied way back then.

1
ItsOkayToBeWight 1 point ago +1 / -0

The US is rich enough that it pioneered Social Security. If we were to restructure all of the dysgentic welfare programs we have into a Social Security-like UBI that does not discourage work as welfare programs do, we would be much better off. And if some people misspend their UBI and buy crack and die early, all the better.

Even Milton Friedman suggested we could afford a Negative Income Tax in the 1970s, which is functionally very similar to UBI.

0
ItsOkayToBeWight 0 points ago +2 / -2

What do you get when you replace half of all of the farmers with combine harvesters? You get World War 1. If you treat people as labor units and they become obsolete, they don't just quietly disappear. We need an economy that serves people, not people that serve an economy.

-4
ItsOkayToBeWight -4 points ago +1 / -5

We have plenty of stagnation today. The mass poverty spearheaded by neoliberalism has kept wages low and prevented adoption of robotics and automation. Why have a burger flipping robot when federal minimum wage is still $7.25? Socialism is the way forward. Capitalism was crumbling in the 1930s. What did we adopt to help deal with it? Social Security. Socialism is in the damn name. Unions are very socialist in desire. Plus lots of of other non-capitalist measures were enacted between the 1930s and 1960s that helped make the 50s and 60s so great.

Why was Germany so powerful in World War 2? They had a fierce fighting force and a roaring industry. The core of their engine wasn't capitalism.

Stop swallowing the neoliberal propaganda. USSR was communist which is different from socialism. Nordic Socialism is working out well for Finland and Norway. It's made Sweden rich enough to afford their ridiculous stance on immigration; though that is collapsing due to a lack of nationalism.

We don't have to go whole hog on it. Small measures, like the difference between 1940s USA compared to 1920s USA would make a big difference.

-13
ItsOkayToBeWight -13 points ago +1 / -14

The monopolization is a response to tumultuous economics. If these people weren't so afraid of losing their livelihoods, they would be more cooperative. This is why we need more socialism. Capitalism encourages monopolies and rent seeking.

6
ItsOkayToBeWight 6 points ago +6 / -0

You have my vote.

3
ItsOkayToBeWight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Context. Pay attention. All of these people are bending over backwards to avoid the obvious conclusion that races are different.

5
ItsOkayToBeWight 5 points ago +5 / -0

If every field of science points to a specific direction, doesn't that make the direction right?

3
ItsOkayToBeWight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oppression olympics WORKS. It's all a competition to be the most oppressed, the most persecuted. Because people with raging justice boners will flock to your side, even if the persecution was completely staged.

Look at how popular professional wrestling is. People love the drama and they know that's fake.

4
ItsOkayToBeWight 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is, by their own definition, stochastic terrorism.

3
ItsOkayToBeWight 3 points ago +3 / -0

What good is catching them on camera going to do? Police are going to shrug and say whatever it takes to make you go away and never look into it.

Their main job is to protect the rich, not you.

5
ItsOkayToBeWight 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are neighborhoods that never recovered from the Rodney King riots. The consequences of the BLM riots are simply if you understand history.

1
ItsOkayToBeWight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Modern commoners do live better than medieval kings, at least in terms of creature comforts. Technology has uplifted everyone and we need to invest more in tech instead of squeezing the people to buy yet another shitty yacht to show off to their vapid friends.

6
ItsOkayToBeWight 6 points ago +6 / -0

This plan doesn't make a whole lot of sense. It's been decades of terror and the joggers have absolutely destroyed cities in the process. What will there be to take over? These scheming elites are going to become kings of the ashes.

by folx
11
ItsOkayToBeWight 11 points ago +11 / -0

4k retweets and 13k likes. This person seems to be a decent representation of twitter idiocy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›