It's socialist policies that allow criminality to fester instead of cleaning house. If the government is locking up criminals so they don't reoffend instead of letting the criminals run amok and prosecuting anyone who defends themselves, policy overrules demographics.
People in that thread are being retarded. The institute is shutting down because they got defunded and instead of selling people's personal information to the highest bidder like most organisations seem to do in their position, they're destroying it. They are not the enemy and they do not deserve blowhards saying that they should be killed or tortured.
I could make a lot of guesses. Democrats are more likely to be neurotic doomsday cultists who think fascism or climate change will ruin America for their children, Democrat counties are more likely to be crime-ridden cities with high costs of living, Democrats are of course more willing to kill their children or castrate their children or themselves. Republican counties apparently have higher divorce rates, but even that is in part because people in red states marry and have kids earlier in life.
You open the door because you thought you lived in a high trust society. If I had been the target, my front door would already be open by the time I got a good look at the shooter and realised my mistake - if I see flashing emergency lights out the window and hear the doorbell, I'm thinking "police" and not "assassin."
I think it's unlikely. The shooter could have multiple reasons to put someone on his list of course, but if it was just about the healthcare bill then you'd naturally assume the five who voted for it would be the primary targets.
This is apparently incorrect - Hortman did, but it was Hauschild, Rest, Kupec and Murphy and not Hoffman who voted for it in the senate.
- these violent "protesters" are largely transplants, provocateurs, pardoned Jan 6 insurrectionists who insert themselves into the local neighborhood and cause violent mayhem.
Good, then they won't mind if the insurrectionists get shot.
We live in a world where practically everyone carries a digital video camera in their pocket. You only need one of the city's nine million residents to think the plane flying overhead sounds strange and start recording.
Although I never personally read her books or watched her movies, I'm happy to admit that she was staggeringly successful as an author. She's a billionaire by the sweat of her own brow, so if she wants to spend her retirement shitposting on Twitter, she's earned it.
Sending Marines or other non-NG military to act on American soil does set a dangerous precedent, not to mention just inflame things further. Again, we already have the Guard. Isn't sending them in enough?
Mexicans are attacking an American city under their own banner. Sending the Army with orders to shoot to kill is the appropriate response.
For some fucking reason people thought it was a good idea in the Spider-verse movies, then they did it again in the Puss in Boots movie, and I just want to explain to these fuckers that dropping frames during action scenes is a hardware issue, not an artistic style to be emulated.
If she's doing shading like that with embroidery that's enough to impress me. But like you say, she's wasting it on being a clown person. If she wants to display her #pride, she should have done a self-portrait that she could hang proudly, not a middle-aged naked woman throwing a tantrum like a baby.
Harvard researcher Dr Sarah Fortune was only two years away from creating a vaccine
That's a bullshit claim. Innovation does not work like that - if you know enough about making the vaccine to predict it will be done in two years, you know enough about making the vaccine to have it done in a week.
Your title is retarded. "Free Palestine" is popular because enemy intelligence operations found fertile ground in a left wing primed to see any piece of shit who gets their just desserts as an innocent victim of oppression.
Based on what I had read since the last post here, calling it an attack is false. Only one of the seven charges actually applies if there was no intent to cause grievous bodily harm, and getting spooked because the crowd was getting rowdy after you negligently drove into a cordoned-off area is not malice.
America is losing because your standards for victory are absurd. In Afghanistan, defeat means not turning the non-Taliban Afghans into a stable, self-sufficient government. In Ukraine, defeat means failing to secure control of a thousand miles of Soviet homeland. If the objective in Afghanistan was "kill those who wronged us" America could have done that in an afternoon.
If the timeline is correct it's the retards who spooked the driver who deserve to be charged for this incident. There's no excuse for opening the car door before anything else has happened, and it's inevitably going to put the driver in fear of a carjacking or worse.
Traitors against whom? The current Iranian regime are not and have never been our friends; anything more favourable than thinking they're more trouble than they're worth to kill is stupid.