You're absolutely right, but it's a back and forth problem.
The company founder worked 80/week for years to make his company succeed and now 2 multimillion dollar houses, 8 cars, etc. He's actually a pretty nice guy but seems to be completely and utterly baffled as to why the people he hired aren't eagerly making the same sacrifice - for $15 - $40 an hour.
Both the commies and the rich company founders tend to have the same vibe trying to discuss the subject, and they're both completely out of touch with what it's actually like for the other people.
Another weird thing about company founders is that they always think they want to hire other people just like themselves but then can never get along with them. Sometimes there's 1 (steve jobs) and sometimes there's 2 (bill gates and steve balmer) but I never see more than 2. You can't have the intense identity-base style of work with more people than that, and they always seem to be angry about that reality.
The commies are way to far on the other side but the "company founder" thing has it's own viewpoint issues that create this back and forth.
It's so theatrical it's almost a movie.
When the capital walk-through happened who did Pelosi call to protect her from the big mean people without guns?
Feminists? No.
A gang of women? No.
A group of women talking about their feelings? No.
She ran to the phone and angrily demanded to know why the exact things her party spent the last 6 years villifying weren't there to protect her sooner.
- Men
- Particularly White Men
- Guns
- Particularly Assault Rifles
- Who didn't care about covid exposure
It's like a parody of itself.
Look through conservative political themes.
- Abortion is bad (used to not be able to do it)
- Birth control is bad, abstinence only (used to be how it was)
- Reducing or getting rid of medicare and social security (there didn't use to be these things, paul ryan)
I'm not commenting on whether they're good or bad, just that there's a consistent theme if you look for it of popularized conservative themes being some sort of "it didn't use to be this way let's go back".
Liberal themes are always about change, including taking a decently working system and replacing it with something much worse just to see change happen.
They only adopt yesterday's progressive position and pretend it was always their values.
Right, yesterdays progressive position.
"I'm for whatever we were doing before".
I think melinda gates has been the primary person behind funding and pushing the female-domination man-hating narrative for the last several years.
Like when a boss runs a project and the project results resemble the boss, I a "we need more women in positions of power" videoshe put out and it was the first time I saw a person who matched the exact tenor of all those reddit and facebook generated comments. The permanent deep sense of disgust, the hard lack of genuine compassion, just enough empathy to read people and use their emotion to beat them with.
These all seem to be modelled after someone with her exact personality - the kind of thing where the product ends up resembling the boss.
I think bill gates at some point realized billions of dollars of his money were being poured by his wife into a campaign against people like him so now they're getting divorced.
Here's the fundamental psychological difference between whether people want to join a liberal part or a conservative party.
Conservatives don't like change. Their aggressive narratives always head towards a "return the the past" ideology. The will destroy a good present to replace it with a worse "how things used to be" system.
Liberals are the opposite and love change in a way you might call an addiction. They'll repaint the house 5 times while the groceries melt in the car just to entertain themselves. Their narratives require changing things all the time to the point that when they run out of a good direction to go in - they'll replace a decently working system with a worse shittier system just to feel like they changed things.
According to this result they do not:
https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/blog/criminal-defense/does-california-have-a-romeo-and-juliet-law/
Romeo and Juliet laws say it is not always a crime to have sex with a minor. The purpose is to decriminalize teenage sex. Such laws generally allow someone over 14 to consent to sex, but only with someone who is no more than three years older. California does not have a Romeo and Juliet law.
In California, it is illegal for anyone to engage in sex with a minor. Even another minor. The only exception is if the parties are married. A minor cannot legally marry in California without a court order. See Family Code 302.
Age of consent means the age at which a person can legally consent to sexual intercourse. There is no age of consent in California. A person over 18 is an adult, a person under 18 is a minor.
But according to a different one:
https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/california-statutory-rape-laws.htm
In California, there is a Romeo and Juliet exemption for consensual sex between a minor and a person who is three or fewer years older or younger. However, this is a limited exception because it serves to reduce the conduct from a felony to a misdemeanor offense. The conduct is still illegal, but someone protected by this exception will face the possibility of smaller fines and reduced jail time.
if proven
Right there is the crux of the problem. You're a somewhat mentally unstable woman who just murdered her husband. What do you do?
- Call the police and spend the rest of your life in jail
- Pressure your daughter to say dad abused her. After he's dead so he won't be talking. Tell your daughter she's out on the street if she doesn't tell the story you want her to tell, faddy's dead anyways, she's going to have nowhere to love if she doesn't go along with it.
After watching the amount of lies my mother put out when my parents got divorced and I insisted on living with my father to get away from her, I can only imagine how someone even more psychotic would act.
Yeah they put a video titled "we're coming for your children" from the mens gay choir.
It turned out several members who produced the video are convincted of underage sex crimes. Maybe they were "statutory" offenses and this is in response to that.
Honestly I'm a bit torn, it's always been rubbish that something like 19 and 17 (as long as it's consensual of course) is a crime, especially a "destroy you for life" kind of crime.
This was actually around the time when feminist pushed a video of so called "street harrassment" where they had an attractive woman walk around new york for 8 hours and got like 2 minutes of men trying to talk to her out of it. All the men were black or hispanic.
It would be funny on it's own.
Bill Gates is in a lot of videos pushing for more and more h1b visa workers. Melinda Gates put out one of those "we need women in positions of power!" videos.
While I'm not sure what's going on I hardly think it matches the narrative they're trying to push.
You’re still acting like the puppets are the puppeteers. As conniving, deceitful, and poisonous weaponized women can be, they are still just the pawns.
I hear this on the people you see not being the people really pulling the strings.
But that doesn't mean that the people pulling the strings are men. This is exactly the kind of stuff rich bored women would like doing.
I think most of these topics are as simple as "in previous times they gained a lot of politics points on this topic so they keep looking to use it for future political points".
How the car companies put lead into gasoline then spent a ton of time trying to pretend it's fine and no risk. Then there's the legit car safety issues. Then there's the car mileage stuff.
An alt-tech search engine is way less exhausting.
Social media consumes a huge amount of resources before you even get to the ideologues. You got the trolls, the shitposters, the stealth advertisers, etc. Then after those guys you get into the actual-child-porn posters, the shock-value-posters, the slow spiral of certain pathological ways of thinking taking it over, etc. Then - after all that - you fainlly get to the ideologues and paid political script poster types.
And that's also before you consider that honestly social media is a plague on humanity to begin with.
I think they're inherently good at abusively manipulating people who can't leave them.
The system has removed your ability to defend yourself from them. And makes it difficult to get away from them as they install themselves in "positions of power" as they like to put it.
"You're a misogynist for saying men and women are different! You HATE WOMEN!"
2 seconds later...
No, not actually the same thing! We're supposed to get cushy mid-level management positions! Foxholes are misogynist.