72
46
17

What are the other sites that let you view social media, without logging in, and can be archived if the default service doesn't allow it?

39

hover over the link before you click it. Also read the last paragraph.

What Other Steps Are You Taking To Protect Your Personal Information? Please Feel Free To Leave Your Tips Below Now… Disclaimer: We sometimes promote other products on our website for a small commission. It’s how our families eat, but we don’t promote anything we haven’t seen or used and nothing we wouldn’t suggest you also use. Plus, 10% of our profits go to our 501c3 nonprofit, “Operation Save Our Soldiers” to end combat PTSD. Thank you for supporting our efforts.

Every one of the account's posts contains a IP harvester. The bot also makes no comments

90
134
53

Telegraph: https://archive.ph/FGnJX ZeroHedge: https://archive.ph/sTt0n BBC: https://archive.ph/D5NwK

he will make a "substantial donation" to Ms Guiffre's charity in support of victims' rights

They filed to dismiss the case within 30 days.

59
60
31

Odysee accused Rumble of generating fake traffic https://archive.ph/aBukJ. In response, Rumble sent a letter to Odysee, threatening to sue if they don't remove the tweet https://archive.ph/jOQCo

Odysee removed the tweet, but then left this snarky non-apology https://archive.vn/TLQdA

Pretending to have higher engagement by falsely boosting numbers in order to to retain and increase customers is a tactic that has been used by some social media companies during their critical early period. I'm not convinced by Odysee's very limited evidence that Rumble has been doing this however, and Rumble would be in significant legal trouble if it was caught lying, since it is acquiring external funding.

64
15
52
32

https://archive.ph/VVdpb

Nature medicine: A SARS-like cluster circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence (09 November 2015)

30 March 2020 Editors’ note, March 2020: We are aware that this article is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.

20 November 2015 In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted to acknowledge a funding source, USAID-EPT-PREDICT funding from EcoHealth Alliance, to Z.-L.S. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.

Author Affiliations include: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Wuhan Institue of Virology, FDA, Bellinzona Institute of Microbiology, & Harvard Medical School

Authors include Zengli-Li Shi, the "Bat Woman" that lead the Wuhan lab. She started gain of function research on CoV spike proteins in 2008 (1) (2). In 2014 she worked on this study in the University of North Carolina with Ralph S Baris (another author, UNC), but left to the Wuhan lab when a moratorium on gain of function research was instituted in the US.

Read the Acknowledgements too. NIAID (among others) provided funding, NIH approved continued study, an exception to the moritorium:

Experiments with the full-length and chimeric SHC014 recombinant viruses were initiated and performed before the GOF research funding pause and have since been reviewed and approved for continued study by the NIH.

21

because of course it is, and on May Day.

60
49
48
41