"... the spiritual heirs of John Wayne Gacy."

Hot damn. That hits like a thunderbolt. Cannibal fucks-- is there any better characterization of our elites in the West? They only stop fucking us to carve off a piece of our body politic to eat. Jesus help us.

They were absolutely on board with vaccines being rushed when it was Trump's Operation Warp Speed. Once it became Biden's Mandate, they lined up for the jab.

Incidentally, this is why I don't believe there was a "party switch." You stand still long enough and the party with only double standards winds up on the other side...

If Ukraine's government ruled for the sake of the country's philia (in the Aristotelian sense), then that might be a good argument. That would mean Ukraine had a cohesive society, where desertion in the face of crisis would be traitorous behavior-- to be dealt with accordingly.

When the government is corrupt (as Ukraine's is) and the ruling caste is of a different religion than the people (as Ukraine's is,) forced conscription starts to look like shoving unwilling citizens' bodies in harm's way for the sake of the ruling caste's agenda. Deserting a government that has arguably already betrayed it's people through gross malfeasance prior to the crisis isn't nearly as clear cut as the situation in the above paragraph.

Certainly. Teddy Roosevelt and Lincoln also deserve a nod. Edison & Tesla, too. Henry Ford, warts and all. Ralph Waldo Emerson is a good one, Western Frontier mythology-- from the Old West to Mark Twain is good, HP Lovecraft's vision of New England is solid, and Gone With the Wind. Last of the Mohicans and Call of the Wild also deserve a nod.

Invoking the Minutemen and Paul Revere would have worked much better in this case. (I bet this tweeter couldn't place Lexington and Concord in history, let alone tell you what state it happened in, though.)

Always been that way.

"With your shield or on it, Spartan."

Yep.

I reached the same conclusion this way: Discrimination is bad, but because you have to be able to discriminate to maintain a standard, that means no more standards-- because standards are discriminatory.

There's no way to say "No" once the train leaves the station.

Because they've been stripped of their culture and history. They cannot use any traditional cannon to justify their position, so they have to use what they do know: vapid pop culture.

I understood this reference.

I wish I didn't, but I do.

Link for those who wish to share the pain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmO-ziHU_D8

It's not about the woman.

It's the internal change that fatherhood forces. Caring for your children moves you further along the path from 'boy' to 'man.' Having to father a child invokes manhood as steward and warden. You care about the world more, because your children inherit it. Your focus ceases to be entirely self-centered because you are invested in your children's success: father to son, in a chain that lasts past your own life.

Fatherhood is literal Patriarchy, and is one of the things Feminists want to destroy. The fact that you're speaking against it is deeply ironic.

now, now, he also sniffs kids hair!

I dunno. The white feather campaign by suffragettes was pretty retarded.

And the prohibitionists were pretty retarded, too.

Women didn't just stop being stupid in the 20th century when they got the vote.

If

Never had one. Fuck 'em.

It's Maoist Intersectionalism, technically Neomarxism-- which is a separate branch of Marxist derived thought from bolshevism, which would be Leninist marxism.

But if you want to get down to it being anti-white, Loxist is the word you're looking for. All the other ideologies are carrying water for Loxism.

I want Parliament to make him scream, "Et tu Brute?"

Is that wrong?

It honestly makes me wonder if there isn't an imminent economic collapse the plebs haven't been told about. That would essentially nullify the long term effects of this powergrab.

Then they choose to be actively anti-White/anti-racist.

It's all in keeping with an inversion of good and evil which is consistent with an ideological possession which can equally be described as demonic.

Behold: The Adversary at work.

Turns out white turbo-autistic middle-aged men with disposable income (who won't buy if it doesn't fit their idea of 'good') will drive a cultural product to be consistently complex.

Go figure.

It's the usual diversity parasites being attracted to a billion dollar industry. It's never been about gaming for them, but rather the cash and the platform.

Their reason is to bait a response which they can call racist & mysogynist.

It's all so tiresome.

You're right. It's wanna be maoists who are intersectional neo-marxists by indoctrination; I just lose my temper when folks call them Nazis, because that's basically duckspeak for 'bad guy' and has no factual basis.

Thanks again for bringing the facts.

*Bolshevik

This is a left wing, intersectional government. Its aims are in keeping with totalitarianism. The tactics borrow from fascism, but the perpetuators are stasis.

The fascists are the opportunists who will try to front the reaction to this left-wing overreach.

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

Central Banks and their financial instruments have always been the enemy.

"What's the penalty for protesting?"

"Financial death/losing the ability to provide."

"And the penalty for actual revolution?"

"Life Imprisonment/basically the same."

"Interesting."

All they're doing is making the protesters into people with nothing left to lose.

Might was well blame gamergate or global warming at this point. Anything to externalize the failure-- any ideological scapegoat will do. Got to stave off self-reflection.

The "Are we the baddies?" moment must be forestalled at all costs.