Now, I would do the impossible to defend his freedom of speech, and I think the mods here are just big pussies whenever they ban him.
I thought the same for a long time. Had an exchange with Dom and changed my mind. Modding a person with monomania is an unenviable task, and the only method of control is to temp ban when a line is crossed.
That Imp can still post here when he doesn't transgress is a testimony to the leniency of the moderation. Reddit-tier mods would have perma'd or shadow-banned him loooong ago.
Mods are Jannies and faggots by definition, but try talking to Dom about it-- there's a rationale to the faggotry, beyond being some sort of thin-skinned pussy.
Is Tariq Nasheed someone popular?
He's a race grifter-- so yes, he's popular in progressive circles.
His whole identity and education is in racial politics, and he has no skill set outside of complaining about race, but hey. He's getting his as a progressive thought-leader. He's living the post-American dream.
They are not ashamed or trying to keep it private.
The fact is that they get off on the opposite: making others view their perversion.
That's literally their kink.
Excellent reason to not kowtow on the trans bathroom issue.
Plus the casualties from side-effects from the shot and lockdown, which we'll never have a good bead on. Excess deaths have been waaaay up since the shot rolled out, and the delaying of routine medical care also had a butcher's bill associated with it.
I think not even that's going to work anymore.
Hedge Funds like Blackrock subsidize woke through ESG investing, so that they interrupt the 'get Woke, go broke' cycle-- what do we do when the Fed itself is subsidizing a group like them to make Woke 'too big to fail?'
I remember the twins, one who got assigned female and raised separately as such, and then he made them act out their assigned sex roles. WITH. EACH. OTHER.
His actions are pretty much inexcusable, even w/o bringing feminists into it.
You can leave sex at 'he's a boy, she's a girl.'
Gender? It's pretty much totally about sexual fetishes, attraction, and presentation.
You don't say 'sex,' but you sure as hell have to talk about sex to explain gender.
Unfortunately, the goal of Critical Theory is to spike the Western Canon: every aspect of Culture must be problematized and destroyed in detail.
Gamergate was a small front in a broader cultural war, one which I was much happier not being aware of.
"I just wanted to play video games"
Wu was one of the "literally who's" of Gamergate, along with Quinn (as abuser and beneficiary of journalistic nepotism) and Sarkisian (the non-gamer, telemarketing face of Tropes Vs. Women). She was then LARPing as a game dev, and came out hard against Gamergate.
They'd scream "Misogyny!" whenever we dug up journalistic malpractice. Collectively they were living chaff and walking distractions. The 'literally who's' were notorious for using the criticism they received as evidence of harassment, to earn victim points for self-promotion, so it was common practice to avoid even naming them.
The left takes advantage of the right by planting strawmen on ground it wants you to be "too good" to take. They want you trying desperately to prove them wrong. This puts you on the hind foot, constantly defending against the attack.
If you're going to pay politically for positions you haven't taken-- why not take full advantage of the position your enemies have already staked out for you? It's what they fear you doing, which is why they ascribed you doing those things.
Embody their fears. Be the champion of patriarchy and Western Culture leftists make you out to be.