The appointment doesn't mean shit if the Senate doesn't allow the appointment.
Probably it's the specific URL being blocked where you're accessing. Public/work (even your own private one) WiFis can log all sites accessed/visited through their access point and can chose to block specific domain URLs, or have a service that automates it
cannot expand my buisness due to... forcing you hiring-laws on me if i go above 30 employees
It's exclusively an EEOC problem? Not the taxes or wage laws?
Their software division is entering the dinosaur stage where it can't innovate anymore or is unwilling to maintain a proper customer base, so the parent megaconglo will just funnel profit from their other pseudo-monopoly subsidiaries to buy already existing products to keep that sector of the business alive.
Happy IMD to you too (☞･ω･)☞
Ukraine Escalation was on my "How they'll fuck with the Trump transition" Bingo card. I'm neither surprised or entirely concerned about this, unless they try a nuclear false-flag.
Question is, does Congress have the nads to sack the Potato's ass before he's punted out of the Oval Office for pulling a stunt like this? Probably not...
Argumentum ad logicam
They claim there's a fallacy in the argument, therefore they claim it's invalid.
mgtow guys complaining about women instead of mgtow guys actually going their own way and doing something else
Because the ones doing it proper usually end up going off the grid or you don't see them posting online often, if ever.
We're reading from those who are complaining about life in probably the only area it can be done anonymously, cyberspace, what people are actually doing in meatspace may be different.
Yeah, it's a big problem if AI is not identifying original research by double-checking the source links. Extremely bad if it's just copy-pasting information from Wiki
There's evidence (Wells' own politics and attitudes) of literary parallels between English colonization/imperialism of the 19th Century and the Martian invasion (superior technology, complete disregard of environment, how the ending comes about), but not of any specific instance, more of a generalization. Goolag probably took different sources with some opinion pieces thrown in, and mushed them together.
It's as dumb as them putting "NO THIS IS NOT RECYCLABLE" on everything.
Used to be if it has a recycle symbol, it could potentially be, based on the number
But clearly too many retards have spawned.
I put this paradox under the banner of logical fallacy.
Since what is described as "tolerance" can be defined by the cultural norms of a certain society, what is marked as "intolerance" is entirely subjective to the society handling said "intolerance". The idea of what qualifies as "intolerance" is not absolutely transferable between societies, and such, no universal definition can exist so long as multiple societies cohabit this planet. With there being no concrete definition between societies, you can never properly define "intolerance", and therefore never be justified in your own intolerance towards "intolerance".
Declaring that some intolerance is necessary opens the door for conflation of what is deemed as intolerance based on other unrelated subjects. A good example of this would be the current year Marxists. According to the history books Nazis are the most recent examples of "intolerance", however these marxists view all forms of anti-neomarxism as akin to Nazism, therefore it's perfectly acceptable to them to be intolerant to people who are against neomarxism, because to them they are no different than "Nazis".
He already fulfilled most of his end of the bargain with his version of God, so it's perfectly okay to abandon relatives if they're being extra or refuse to worship. Such is following a centuries-old book written by Men to the letter.
atheist -> There is no god. Lol I'm smart sCiEnCe RuLeS
anti-theist -> I don't like religion, it doesn't benefit humanity.
These two things aren't alike.
Once again users have gotten lazy about source posting.
I guess the realization caused a conditioned reaction to where he tried to deny it immediately. Sort of like a mental paradox that breaks the psyche.
It's best if the women engaging in this already have expired eggs / barren uterus. Just don't let it ruin the younger ones who are so easily led by the nose.
Ah okay, I see how that might have set the guy off.
I don't get into political discussions at all with people in meatspace. Nor do I try to force people into hair trigger discussions. Waste of time and energy.
Then I hit the topic of anti white discrimination, and he went off
You gave no example of how you phrased it, so we have no clue how it is you triggered him.
Yet happy i can at least come here to talk with natsoc boyos instead of limp dick soyos
You're fortunate there's enough of your ilk camping here and engaging in polite discussion. You claim to have been here long before, so I'm sure you know many here are not fans of authoritarianism or statism.
So, doing what they already were doing last time he was in office?
It's more simple than that, nothing psychological.
When you're in a top-down Imperial society that demands all peons contribute back to the top for the survival of the Glorious Government, anyone that isn't contributing back in a meaningful manner is looked down upon as a negative. Entertainers pretty much fit that bill when you think about it, as they're rather extraneous to human survival.
If it truly is the "they can pretend, so they're untrustworthy" mentality, might be more of the average person's lack of understanding the ability to compartmentalize. I don't think all of pre-Industrial era acting had the same kind of problems Hollywood and beyond acting had too. The concept of celebrity didn't really reach it's modern emptiness until mass media became a thing.
burakkumin
The noting of "gravediggers" should point to that it wasn't a full-proof idea in Japan. To my knowledge, this "caste" includes animal butchers, a profession that can also be necessary to society. IIRC, depending on the region this attitude is still practiced to this day.
I would have said "exhibitionists" as nudism is legal in private property/designated areas.
Yeah, I wasn't entirely sure what the proper term in this context would be, so I went with that word
sex offender registry protester
The subject matter becomes a hot button topic because the registry can include morons found naked while intoxicated, "urinating in public", and possible convicts of false rape accusations. To my knowledge, almost any sexual/nudity-related offense or misdemeanor automatically gets you thrown on the list. It should still exist for convicted pedophiles, assailants, proven rapists and nudists, but like most criminals there's no remediation once you end up docked the first time. Doesn't matter the level of offense, because it's not tiered; normal life pretty much ends.
Rightwingers are now placated into inaction
You want to be productive, go start your own Patriot Front.
This transition is going to be Round 2 of supporters not understanding The Art of the Deal. One can put the most extreme ask first to test the waters and then get someone that could still do some (or even most) of what one wants.
Last time Trump wasn't as well-informed of the Beltway Politics and the snakes in the pit, so he made bad picks. This time he probably does know how to play the game better.