7
Deceitful_Fox 7 points ago +7 / -0

I agree with you, but with the benefit of hindsight I bet there are a few more things the founding fathers would have spelled out in inarguable black and white.

I also think that no system of government is suitable for all periods of history. Right now I think America may well benefit from a Caesar brushing aside the fat and happy elite.

10
Deceitful_Fox 10 points ago +10 / -0

I suppose then that begs the question: Did those amendments pass because of an intrinsic weakness in the constitutional republic model that other models of government would be more resilient to?

16
Deceitful_Fox 16 points ago +16 / -0

In non-clown world we call this 'evidence tampering'.

27
Deceitful_Fox 27 points ago +27 / -0

This is one of those times where we on the dissident right need to agree and amplify. Even if you don't like Trump, or think he's weak willed and will get nothing done in office, just him saying this in the mainstream is a huge push for the Overton window.

'Trump is right, there is an anti-white feeling in this country, and furthermore... some other relevant argument that normies are unlikely to be aware of, and/or a link to some based information'. That's how you ratchet things in our direction.

Much like Elon Musk with Twitter, we can't let perfect be the enemy of good. We must use the opportunities presented to us. That's how the left got this far, after all.

5
Deceitful_Fox 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don't you think there's some contradiction in your statements there?

'White women are much more to blame' and 'Any such conspiracy comprised of women would dissolve into petty drama and backstabbing before it achieved anything'.

I think we can both agree that what's happening in the West is the result of a concerted effort, right? That concerted effort has to come from somewhere. I'm a white nationalist, and I think I represent most people of a similar belief when I say that we don't believe women are responsible not because they are 'precious white women', but because women are rarely ever responsible for anything. Any political actions that women take are likely to be due to their herd-like nature, not because they arrived at those conclusions on their own. Women are easily led. The question then becomes, who is leading them?

For the record, I don't think jews are the only perpetrators.

10
Deceitful_Fox 10 points ago +10 / -0

Treason requires you to be a member of the group you are transgressing against. In this case it would just be execution of a foreign enemy actor.

3
Deceitful_Fox 3 points ago +3 / -0

How did xseed actually capitulate to Sony? I played the Trails and Ys series before I was aware of the localisation problem, so I don't know if they were heavily censored or not.

4
Deceitful_Fox 4 points ago +4 / -0

I personally prefer Midnight Club 3, but Most Wanted is a solid choice.

3
Deceitful_Fox 3 points ago +3 / -0

As someone on this side of the fence I still don't fully understand what QAnon is (probably because I'm not in America). It turned out to be a psyop, right? Like a legit 3 letter agency psyop?

10
Deceitful_Fox 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's also very difficult to convince conservatives to organise. We are disagreeable and individualistic by nature. That's why there's always so much back biting.

8
Deceitful_Fox 8 points ago +8 / -0

Healthy societies perpetuate certain norms and behaviours for different social roles. Mother, father, man, woman, boy, girl, etc. This is because, as we are in the painful process of rediscovering in the West, if you leave people to their own devices with no direction, they will lose their minds. Either they drift aimlessly, or they latch on with a vice-like grip to the first thing that promises direction and purpose to their life.

You really don't have to cater for the exceptions, boundary-pushers or border-straddlers, because anyone who is serious about defying society's expectations for them (female blacksmiths, male nurses, etc.) will push through with sheer force of will and achieve what they want. If they aren't willing to persevere against social pressure, they obviously aren't serious about whatever it is they claim they want to do that defies the norms. A healthy society can tolerate a certain number of eccentrics and deviants.

For everyone else, they NEED these social norms. It gives us all a shared language by which we can navigate social situations. It provides safety nets and guard rails for the different roles in society. Most people are not capable of putting rational checks on their own behaviour. They have no use for absolute freedom. If you give it to them, they will squander it, or it will consume their potential in hedonism and aimlessness.

9
Deceitful_Fox 9 points ago +9 / -0

I guess the US is going to have to have a heavily militarised southern AND northern border if it can overcome its own internal problems.

6
Deceitful_Fox 6 points ago +6 / -0

Whenever I see videos like this I always come back to the same thought. Britain has always had its share of shitholes, like any country--the squalor of medieval cities, the tenements at the end of the 19th century/early 20th century--but at least they were OUR shitholes. When you're dealing with your own people, you always have a chance at improving the situation, because ultimately it's a material problem.

What we have now is a spiritual problem, and the people occupying these places have no connection to us whatsoever. Why should they care that the grand Victorian buildings in the town centre are derelict? Their ancestors didn't build them. They don't know any different.

Perhaps I'm a coward for leaving the UK rather than staying and fighting the decline. The way I see it, things will not change until people are forced to confront this decline through some kind of economic crisis or civil unrest; something on their doorstep that they can no longer ignore. At the moment, the vast majority of British people are still too comfortable to acknowledge that there is a problem.

4
Deceitful_Fox 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have to be honest, this one kind of baffles me. I don't know why they would produce something like this right now. It's obviously playing off of what is in the public consciousness, but why? They surely know how tense things are in America at the moment, with two rapidly crystallising factions battling for its destiny. What is the point of provoking this very volatile situation with a piece of media like this?

Is it just a case of art imitating life? I've been robbed of the notion that any media get produced without the say so of the powers that be. If so, why would they tempt fate like this? It reminds me of 2016 when people memed Donald Trump's presidency into being. Are they trying to meme a civil war into being?

6
Deceitful_Fox 6 points ago +6 / -0

To be fair, if you just 'save money' nowadays, it will be 25% gone within 5 years, if you're lucky. Much better idea to invest it.

3
Deceitful_Fox 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does anyone remember that really mediocre mid 2000s shooter Haze? Dreadful as the story was, the one thing I really liked about it was the concept of the corpo soldiers having implants that would show them a curated version of reality, erasing their downed comrades from their view to prevent loss of morale, for example.

There isn't a shadow of a doubt it my mind that Google or Microsoft would show you their curated version of reality if they could get away with it.

10
Deceitful_Fox 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm currently in the laborious and expensive process of applying for a US visa. My wife's family has frequently joked that we should just fly to Mexico and hop the border. If that plan didn't involve me rubbing shoulders with dirty central American migrants for days on end, I might just consider it.

5
Deceitful_Fox 5 points ago +5 / -0

I mostly just lurk on this board, but I do see you post quite frequently. From what I have gathered of your life, the best advice I can offer is to pick a path and stick with it, regardless of the difficulties that crop up.

That's what I had to do to get out of the dark place I found myself in. I realised part of the reason I hadn't made any progress in life is because I felt overwhelmed by choice. I had a tiny bit of experience being an intern for an IT company, so I basically said 'Right, this is what I'm going to do come hell or high water, because it's definitely going to be better than wallowing in self-pity.' That gave me the motivation to pick myself up and go to university, and really take it seriously, not just to piss around as I would have done if I was 18.

Did I know if I would really enjoy working in IT? No, not really. It's scary making those kind of decisions because you cut yourself off from all the other possibilities of what you could do in life. At some point you have to take a leap of faith, though. In most cases you will find that success in one area tends to lead to success in other, unexpected areas of life.

5
Deceitful_Fox 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have personally found that one's perception of pain is closely tied to one's mental state. In my early 20s when I was in the depths of depression, I felt constant aches and pains all over my body, and every little niggle or physical inconvenience would manifest itself as physical pain, to the point where I thought there was something seriously physiologically wrong with me.

Now that I am married, exercise regularly, and am successful in my career, my overall daily experience of pain is greatly reduced. Things which I used to have to take pills for I can shrug off without issue. I presume this is because the body produces more natural pain killers when you are in a better mental state. That might go someway to explain how different people's pain threshold changes not just with their experience of pain, but their life circumstances.

13
Deceitful_Fox 13 points ago +13 / -0

Some people were permanently messed up by the COVID experience. Mentally, I mean. I don't think they will ever fully recover. Occasionally I see people still wearing masks when out and about and I think 'Man, if only you could understand what was done to you.'

5
Deceitful_Fox 5 points ago +5 / -0

She doesn't have any kids to raise. You tend to accumulate a decent amount of money if you remain without a family into your middle age (especially if you are an unscrupulous scam artist).

1
Deceitful_Fox 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not necessarily against the concept of unions, as I do think it is necessary for all kinds of groups to organise in their own defence against greater powers, but in practice they become corrupt like any man made organisation.

The fact that every single union isn't devoting 100% of its time, funding and energy towards campaigning against immigration is a damning indictment of all of them.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›