If he's trying to draw a comparison between Kapparot and Grace, he has no understanding of the Christian religion at all.
Or a kosher light switch. This is not a parody.
I prefer Unz's own article on the matter American Pravda: Oddities of the Jewish Religion.
It is said that after the sack of Jerusalem in 70 AD Titus Caesar Vespasianus refused a victory wreath saying that there is “no merit in vanquishing people forsaken by their own God.”
I've always thought of Tucker as a bit of a goober. One, is he usually this on point? And two, is this a lead up for another TV guy to run for president?
Spoof Trailer for a Horror movie involving libs learning that Biden is running again in 2024, lots of jump scares for each possible alternative including Bernie, Hillary, et al. Best one being a Beto 2024 flyer slid under the door. They all settle on Joe running as best choice. Movie title, "2020 Part 2: 2024".
Frankly SNL is not funny, and this wasn't funny when it came out inn 2022. It is however fucking hilarious that its essentially playing out verbatim on reddit and twitter over the past four days.
Turns out SNL can be funny if it ages for a year or two. Like cheese, limburger cheese.
I find it pretty unlikely that Biden is replaced. He hasn't been running the show at the White House since inauguration day. Whatever group is pulling the strings did it out of necessity at first, but now they like being President. Biden's condition isn't a problem for them its a benefit so long as they can push him across the finish line. Harris will back the current admin publicly because its her only shot at being President: the DNC will have a hard time oustering a minority woman. Add in the fact that the Shadow President(s) would be right about the dangers of changing horses right now and you ensure Biden will be the nominee unless he dies before the convention (an actual possibility in my opinion).
Damn, only 68% This test is bullshit because any collection of "moderate" opinions on Jews would get you labeled anti-Semitic in the public sphere. For example, the question on Jewish influence in media: a "somewhat agree" will get you listed by the ADL even if a brief study of C-level executives in media would yield a "strongly agree" position.
Gets ye olde noggin joggin, doesn't it?
No it to prevent normals from shitting up shill reddits with "dude, Biden is actulaly old and senile. wtf?"
if you go to reddit right now, comments across subs are invisible. Literally you can click on a thread in r/politics or r/conservative that claims hundreds of comments and your are greeted by:' "there doesn't seem to be anything here."
Edit: and there's no way to archive that shit.
Edit2: Hate to say it but some one is actually "shutting it down."
Edit3: redditors have discovered that comments are hidden sitewide/ r/conservative has a highly upovted thread redirecting to discord. Comments section reads: "there doesn't seem to be anything here."
I'm always salty about progressive racialists proving me right. I'm a stupid Catholic: God cares for us all. But people are not the same. Just ask ask anyone with a alcoholic bipolar twat in the family. I won't " get rid of " her, but I'll plan around her. As a society we need control the anti-social elements and direct them to functionality. The BLM and even the lackluster morons demanding weed are social enemies that don't know they are cutting society apart one bit at a time .
The 1863 New York City draft riots
During the Civil War, northern states like New York instituted a lottery draft of fighting-age white men. At the time, Black men were exempted
The rioters’ anger over their subordinate social class largely drove their attacks against Black men
Next up, why white people should pay black people for slavery!
To just deny the crime itself makes zero sense.
There is a significant part of the American population that believes laws are unjust because a lot people break them. There are AGs decline to prosecute certain crimes because certain people get arrested for them.
No offence intended, but if your going to post the output of a language model, why not offer a defense or criticism of the out put? To my understanding, a LLM's output is, at best, a conglomeration of the posts of redditors and urinalists.
I do like the sources being attached at least. The LLM, of course didn't really use the sources.
fuck kristol and his evil ilk
As much as I love the Iowa class, there's a whole lot of design space between an old school battle ship and a design for an modern in shore fighting frigate(?).
There's a whole very technical conversation to be had here. The Navy developed and then abandoned a class of "littoral" combat vessels in the mid aughts. These ships would have been designed to handle exactly what is happening in the Red Sea. The problem is that these vessels would have to be "fighting" ships. They would have had to rely on a combination classic naval guns for offence and CIWS guns for defense. Its a workable system but not perfect. They would not have been "superior" and I think thats why they were abandoned in favor of more "modern" fleet solutions.
At modern scale you might have a point, but international shipping has been a thing since the 15th century.
Their armament can reach shipping in the straights, with incredible cost effectiveness.
Fair enough. I guess the answer to my gripes it that modern tech require a "land war" when it come to control of the Red Sea.
I know. That was kind of my point. Surely an MEU and a naval support could hit Houthi ports and surrounding facilities then return to the carrier group? Its how we used to fight. Are the joint chiefs taking such exercise off the table?
a sm2 (standard missile 2) is I think right around $1mil a shot.
I keep hearing this from various professionals. Perhaps giving up gunnery in favor of high tech ballistics was a mistake?
muslims don't care about their own lives
I'm not sure I buy this. "I'm willing to die to fight the outlander" is not the same as "I don't care if I live or die." Particularly when the Yemenese Houthis seem to be achieving their goals.
Make no mistake, I don't care about what are essentially 21st century privateers (Iranian letter of marque, as it where), but a Navy's job is not to go fight the other guy's navy. Navies exist to protect commerce. Why is a US carrier group unable to do this in the Red Sea?
I propose all are required to speak a racial slur aloud before eating ham sandwiches while singing "God Save the King." Daily.