In addition to concensus, women also overly rely on authority figures to derive their information. It's one of the reasons feminism has been so destructive. It's separated women from their men, and propped up government and other corrupt entities as authority figures, who lie and manipulate, especially with appeals to authority, popularity, and emotion, which easily sways women. Google is viewed as an authority figure over a veteran in his field by normies.
Agreed. And thank you for pointing out the illogic of their arguments. It might not be important to them, but it should be to us. However, I'd like to point out that there have already been numerous casualties. We only hear about a fraction of them, and many, even here, don't consider all of the casualties that this stuff has caused.
The changes we've made to Western civilization are catastrophic over the long term. We've adopted philosophies and practices that, individually, spell doom to anyone stupid enough to follow them, and we've adopted multiple. It takes time to wear down a successful civilization. We're in the middle stages where the consequences are becoming readily apparent. They will become increasingly moreso as time passes, as these philosophies and policies take greater effect, and as intelligent people wake up to it, separate themselves from it to protect themselves, and form parallel communities and societies with like minded people, further depleting the meritous population that are currently upholding the old corrupted system, all of which will accelerate the collapse.
This shitshow has only just started.
Also, the pilot in the audio should have never apologized. When you know you're right, never cede an inch to these idiots and liars.
I've seen stuff like this claimed (hoped) numerous times. Has this ever actually happened, an instance where the good guys were in control but had to lie (go along with the insanity) or pretend to lose so they could gain the upper hand at some unknown point in time in the future?
People aren't prone to change unless under pain and hardship. When people are comfortable, they remain as they are, even sitting, right until the moment before the explosion, because the explosion hasn't happened yet. People will just keep doing what they're doing, because they're comfortable, even if heading right toward a cliff.
This problem is exacerbated because Western peoples have been so comfortable for so long, that our survival instincts have been dulled a great deal. We rely on others to save us, and face almost no dangers ourselves.
Every good self defense course will tell you to remain at a heightened alert, to watch what people do, so you are prepared for the attack and react to it before it happens. Most people aren't like that. Again, their survival instincts have been dulled.
Thus, you have situations exactly like this. Even a moderately aware person, even assuming it could be a joke, would have run for their lives and/or tried to save/warn others, or stopped the assailant, immediately upon seeing grenades being pulled from that man's pockets. To do anything less is to invite death.
SyntheticMan is right. A lot of modern gamers deserve this garbage, because they keep supporting it, knowing what it is. Woke, globalist propaganda, the same titles rehashed every year with a new number on it, DRM, always online, micro transactions, etc.
They push something they know is 100% opposite of reality.
I've already explicitly stated that I was only commenting on the accuracy of the position. I already agreed with you that women wouldn't be wearing pants and have a blanket covering the pertinent area to block view while pushing during the end stages of labor.
Women are not sitting in her position with her legs under her while pushing the baby out (I was wrong on the position look at the pic it's impossible).
Here, let me do a simple internet search for you ("natural labor squatting position"). Here are just 3 results:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmTBAXbh7_E
https://www.verywellfamily.com/squatting-for-birth-2752959
https://www.takingcharge.csh.umn.edu/birthing-positions
Women have given birth in that position for thousands of years. So, too, have they given birth on all fours, or sitting down in various positions, or partially submerged in water.
I'm not exactly sure why you're planting your flag on this hill. It seems rather obvious that you've never had kids.
Women aren't laying down, or in any specific position, for hours while in labor. The pushing only happens when fully dilated. Many women prefer to be up and about before then, or change positions constantly until right at the end when the baby is coming. Everything you've seen in Hollywood media or what hospitals make women do while on pain meds is contrary to what women will do when giving birth naturally. Furthermore, pregnancy is only super long for new mothers. The more kids a woman has, the quicker it goes.
But hey, you don't have to take my word for it. Go talk with midwives that specialize in natural home births. Or go talk to the Amish. Or read a book on it. There's tons of them. It's not like I'm arguing this from the void, completely absent of experience and the entire history of our species.
I enjoyed the Godzilla 2014 movie, but the subsequent ones definitely seemed to go further astray into typical Hollywood action.
I've slowly begun to look more into foreign films, as quite a lot of them are really good, and even the non existence of the propaganda makes even mediocre films a lot more enjoyable.
Train to Busan (a Korean zombie movie) and Kesari (an Indian "historical" film about Muslim invaders) were both quite enjoyable. Kesari definitely had a Bollywood flare to it, with near super hero powers attributed to the Sikhs, and of course a Bollywood dance number in the middle, but the message was poignant, and it praised their own people and religion, rather than cut them down like Hollywood. I've also heard RRR is good (another Indian flick), but haven't seen it.
I also just watched a Russian fantasy/"horror" movie called Day Watch, which was probably the weirdest movie I've ever seen, but simultaneously hilarious because of how weird it was. The English dubs certainly didn't do it any favors. I prefer to watch foreign films in the native language with subtitles.
If you want a good family flick, check out an Irish movie called The Secret of Roan Inish. Wholesome with a good message, with a slight fantasy element about selkies. Another good Irish movie about selkies is Ondine, which is a bit less family friendly (language and nudity through wet clothing), but quite funny and wholesome.
Going to see it this week, too. It looks good. It sucks that we have to resort to foreign films to avoid the woke propaganda of (((Hollywood))).
Well, I definitely agree that modern art is shit.
It's not by accident either. There are definitely dysgenic factors that have devolved art into it's modern state, following along natural lines of the rise and fall of civilization, but one can't deny the maliciousness behind it, as with so many other things affecting Western civilization. Modern art is ugly, demoralizing, humiliating, propaganda, as is most other corrupted media. It's achieving the exact antithesis of what art is meant to do: to increase the beauty of our world, to teach us lessons, to connect us with our ancestors, to inspire us, to pass on tradition, to help us improve, to increase our love and connection to our communities, nations, and people, to increase social cohesion and strength.
Or prisons, where there's more danger involved, which pushes people towards natural inclinations.
you're full of it.
Why?
I was speaking primarily of the stance. Women have been giving birth naturally for thousands of years, and mid wives and husbands have "caught" babies just fine from this position. But, you're right that they wouldn't cover their rear end or wear pants. Many women who give birth naturally prefer to be completely naked. Even fabric touching them can bother them, but it depends on the woman and the birth.
Learned all this from my mom, who insisted on having natural births for me and all my siblings, not vaccinating us, having us birthed at home, and generally being a better mom. She read a lot of books on it, and how it affects both the mother and child. Really glad she did that, too, considering how corrupt modern medicine and society has become, especially with how antagonistic it's become against children, mothers, and tradition (if they're White).
The modern form of child birth in hospitals, where they lay the mother flat on their back with legs spread on stirrups, is incredibly uncomfortable for women not on pain meds. When women have natural births they prefer other positions, like the one in this comic, sitting down or squatting, or partially submerged in water.
That's exactly what interracial crime stats show in every single White majority country. White people are the predominant victim in interracial crime stats.
Nope. People predominantly prefer to live in white spaces
Yes and no.
Non-whites love to live in White countries, and in White predominant areas, but when they move into them, they form their own ethnic enclaves. I've seen it dozens of times, across every racial line, in numerous locations. Don't believe me? Go deliver food or drive around a large city's suburb. The more non-whites sub groups the better. I've seen it among Indians, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Whites (that's why White flight exists), and it can be broken down into specific sub groups, too.
The few "integrated" and seemingly well adjusted non-whites are the higher functioning ones (the outliers on the bell curve), the ones that don't want to be next to their own kind. They're the trojan horse that convinces the local Whites that they're all like that, when they're not. If they were, their home countries wouldn't be shit holes. Over time, more and more non-whites immigrate to the area around the ethnic enclave, and slowly take it over, because White people flee to a Whiter area, and because we're having so few children, especially in suburban and city areas where most of this replacement migration has been occurring. It's also because a lot of non-white migration is being paid for and supported by blatantly anti-White NGOs and politicians.
After a certain amount of time, the once entirely White area is now almost completely devoid of White people, and the ethnic enclaves revert back to what their host countries look like, in every way.
That’s why homes cost the most in white neighborhoods.
It's partly because of White people fleeing to Whiter areas, and because of the higher functioning non-whites wanting to move there (that have the money to do so), and because housing/migrant/economic problems cause problems elsewhere. I live in an area where I can no longer afford a house (the same with most people my age), because of other states fucking up, pushing their people and businesses away, which causes their people to move here, in addition to the open borders and increasing migrant pressures, which has caused a massive balloon of both housing and rent prices.
Look at immigration as a whole. It’s mostly black and brown people moving to white countries. That doesn’t sound like “everyone prefers their own kind”.
This is only because it's massively inorganic, and has been from the beginning. If White people were allowed our own ethnic collective interests, we wouldn't be ruled over by blatantly anti-White leaders, in every institution in our own countries, and those leaders wouldn't be working with globalists and their NGOs to open our borders, and use our own tax money to fund their operations to literally bus, truck, train, and boat non-whites into our countries 24/7. If White people were allowed to espouse for our own ethnic interests, none of this would be happening. We'd have closed borders and keep our immigration White only.
The reason why non-whites want to come to White countries is because globalists have convinced them they can come, and because they know White countries afford them better opportunities. They're parasites and leeches. This is why a lot of the money "migrants" make is sent back to their families in their home countries, to the tune of tens of billions every year.
On the rest, I agree with your sentiments.
You make a fair point, and have accrued a suspicious amount of downvotes. Clearly some jimmies have been rustled.
It should also be noted that Mossad and the CIA played a large hand in leading, training, funding, arming, and creating ISIS, as well as many other terrorist organizations. Many terrorist attacks have been false flags meant to manipulate public opinion and push for globalist policies.
Not necessarily.
When the gun debate got really big under Obama, the racial component of gun crime (and all crime) became glaringly obvious, even in normie right wing spaces. Blacks commit most violent crime, despite being a small percentage of the population. The one (laughable) counter argument the left and anti-racists tried to use against these statistics, is that most of the victims of black crime are other blacks.
Why is that? It's because, despite all the ridiculous multicultural propaganda in the West, people still predominantly prefer to live with their own kind. Even in "diverse" areas, people form ethnic enclaves. I've seen it myself, in numerous locations. So, when crime happens, the most likely victims will be of the perpetrators own kind.
However, there's obviously bleed over and blending of the populations, leading to interracial crime stats, which skew overwhelmingly towards certain races.
Non-whites, with the exclusion of certain Asians, are more violent than White people, and White people are the predominant victim of interracial crime stats. Just because a violent non-white hurts one of their own in a "spree" doesn't discount the inherent anti-White biases in interracial crime.
Possibly epigenetic changes due to Western opulence and ease of living (which is quickly going away as our civilization slides toward collapse). Wide set eyes are prey eyes, so they can monitor their surroundings for predators. Predators (what humans are supposed to be) have eyes looking forward, to target lock onto prey.
Weirdly, most prey animals sport R selection breeding strategy (having more offspring with lower quality), yet this phenomenon is occuring while feminisn has caused Western birth rates to plummet below replacement levels. So, ease of living, comfort, and lack of hardship is probably the cause of these epigenetic freaks.
Somewhat. There are definitely a lot of people awake now, but clearly we're not yet willing to do what it takes to stop it, or in large enough numbers. It's going to have to get worse, and it will. Fortunately, the vectors are in our favor, at least for swelling our numbers. We still have a lot of work to do, to convince people that it's okay for White people to collectivize, for us to have our own communities and countries, that we must exfiltrate ourselves from the propaganda and systems which are killing us, that it's fine to be racist, and that we must not compromise and acquiesce to the arguments and tactics of our enemies who are killing us.
Comfortable people are much less likely to fix things. Our comforts are being taken away. Notice how the most blind White generations are the ones least likely to notice anything is wrong: boomers. It's because boomers have a house, have good jobs, live in better neighborhoods, and are close to retirement. I don't like to cause infighting, as it detracts from the real issues, but being cognizant of patterns helps to identify patterns and trajectories. There are large swaths of our own people that refuse to see the increasingly obvious. It will have to get worse, much worse, to wake such people up.
Y'all think this is bad now? These are only the first stages of genocide priming propaganda. It's going to get a lot worse. Unfortunately it'll have to, to convince many White people to collectivize, to stop being afraid of being labelled "racist".
To be fair, they act fairly normally and fit in on any other subject, but the moment the discussion involves jews, for some reason they get extremely defensive and hostile. It's like a switch is flipped. Not sure if they're shills trying to remain covert, jews themselves, or incredibly indoctrinated by Western propaganda, which has turned jews into sacred cows capable of doing no wrong, and anyone who criticizes them into Nazis (it's exactly like a religion).
He shills for jews, whenever they come up or whenever they're involved in a discussion, no matter what. So does Gizortnik.
They'll just reduce the requirements for the diversity hires so they can "pass", like they did with women in the military, which has led to a lot of men dying unnecessarily. When people die as a result of the diversity, they'll just try to cover it up, as per usual.