If this was an ad, I'd unironically buy the product.

These useful idiots are quite literally faced with the choice:

1. save the White race from extinction but be racist

2. all White people are raped and murdered, but you're not racist

And they'd fall over themselves in trepidation of being called racist, with "but..." statements.

who refuse to acknowledge the role that leftism plays in most of bad modern media

The people I watched, which I listed above, do acknowledge the role the left plays, and many of the bad influences it has in entertainment. However, I think you hit it more squarely on the head when you said:

I assume most of these critics are protecting their income by endlessly beating around the bush versus connecting the dots and arriving at real root causes

I used to watch those guys religiously, because they were at least entertaining and funny, but there were several instances where their own fans/commenters pointed out the root causes, and were banned for "hate speech" in comment sections, or they themselves stepped just over the line, and knew they did, and instantly back tracked for fear of losing their gravy train on Youtube. It's cowardly. Even if all those guys were genuine, and driven purely by maintaining their cash flow, they've, by choice, aligned themselves perfectly with the rest of the false choice mainstream right wing, which is entirely curated and controlled, meant to capture people from moving further right, to give people the illusion of choice and resistance, to prevent people from discussing actual verboten topics, of figuring out and pursuing effective solutions.

Once I figured out that's what they were doing, I lost all respect for them and stopped watching all of them. They're incapable of actually fighting the "culture war" in the confines they, by their own choice, keep themselves in, and are afraid of making an actual difference by taking the chance of discussing the truth, for fear of being banned to a smaller platform and making less money. That means, in essence, they prioritize money over the truth. Anything else they claim to be is bullshit. We have enough sell outs on the right more than happy to sell their souls to the devil, and resign their people to genocide, all for a fucking pittance paycheck. No one is going to be saved by following those types of people. The people that do follow them are doomed, just as much as the useful idiots on the left.

Yep. I can't believe this still needs to be explained, though.

For the people in power (of these companies), the only motive that makes sense is malice.

They're clearly not driven by incompetence, even though they attract it with their policies. Why not? Because stupidity will result in varied decisions and outcomes. We're not seeing that, though. These people are all saying and doing the exact same things, all of it poison. They even believe the exact same things, all of it poison. The sameness exists in all of these different companies, in all sectors of society, and across national borders.

They're clearly not driven by greed, as every single one of these DEI ventures loses tons of money, often billions of dollars, year after year. They don't stop pushing this insanity "when the money runs out". We've seen repeatedly that they double down and push it harder. They're obviously being funded through extremely dishonest means, money laundered from banking, usury, fractional reserve banking, money printing, trillion dollar spending bills, "foreign aid", and all manner of drug, weapon, and human trafficking. The money is never going to run out unless the people doing this are stopped.

The only motive that makes sense is malice. These people are evil.

For them to maintain power, and to keep pushing their agenda of lies, of pushing us further into hellworld, they have to constantly push their propaganda. Propaganda is used to make people believe things they nornally wouldn't (i.e. lies). That's why propaganda had to be pushed regularly, to keep people believing the lie, so they don't escape and realize the obvious truth. The more egregious the lie, the more extreme the propaganda, in terms of quantity, magnitude, and frequency. That's why they've captured almost every sector of society, almost every major company, almost every Western country, and turned all of it into a propaganda outlet, spewing their lies 24/7.

They're not going to stop, and there is no bottom depth to the hell in which they'll push us. It's going to keep getting worse. Fortunately, though, even under the deluge of their propaganda, more people are waking up, because the lies are making less and less sense. They used to get away with it because their propaganda was more subtle. Not any more.

Tangentially related, this is one of the reasons why I stopped watching "culture war" personalities like Nerdrotic, Az, Ryan Kinnel, Film Threat, etc., because they still, STILL, think this is all due to incompetence and/or greed. They think this insanity will end "when the money runs out". They're right wing normies, who just like them, keep getting screwed over by the Republicans, get pissed off about it every year, but then keep voting for them. They keep saying and doing the exact same thing expecting a different result.

I hope they do, to further identify who they are to the rest of us, if the blue hair, morbid obesity, low T, high estrogen, face mask, sanpaku eyes, and screeching about [current thing] weren't telling enough.

Keynesian economics to a T. Money moved? We're rich! Everyone who believes in it has a PhD in stupidity.

Are you suggesting that the liars in charge cook the books? I'm shocked! Shocked! Truly, though, good observation.

Would explain why the character in this game, in an almost literal way, is opening the gates to the invading army. Jews historically are prone to that behavior.

The one unforgivable transgression she dared make was making a comparison to the Holocaust. If I remember the timeline correctly, she was fired immediately afterward.

How I learned to stop denying their claims, and enjoy being called racist.

Agreed, but I'd like to add to it. It's tangentially related, but I love philosophical subjects and how they connect to real world stuff.

adult realization that there are things more important than you and fundamental purpose of your life is to sacrifice yourself for those is almost impossible for a person to do for himself in a vacuum.

There's a somewhat paradoxical view of humanity that I've learned over the years. I try to break things down to the foundations, to learn the true causes and effects, and what happens when things are changed (corrupted, like in modern society).

In this case, specifically, I view humanity's natural state as living without civilization, in the wild, forced to survive in a harsh environment. It's the beginning stages of all life and all people. Civilization is a result of man's efforts and works. Without that effort and work, to start it and maintain it, civilization ceases to exist.

However, people are social creatures. We naturally form communities/tribes/groups with others of like mind to pursue common interests and goals. The first/primary/foundational and most important mutual goal is survival. This is why we see social circles in other species as well. The natural state of man is create the very foundations of civilization itself, which seems to contradict the first stage as being the foundation. This statement is neither here nor there, but I just find it interesting.

In any case, man forms tribes to pursue mutual interests, the first being survival. If the people of that tribe adhere to truth, it grows and prospers. If not, it barely escapes this first stage of development, fails completely, separates into differing other tribes to pursue differing opinions, or is killed off, enslaved, or conquered by outside forces due to some weakness, derived from our lack of adherence to truth and/or our inherent weaknesses as mortal, finite, imperfect beings. To steal a line from Star Trek, " it is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose". While perfect adherence to truth absolutely lessens the possibility of failure, it doesn't completely prevent it, as we're still mortal, finite, imperfect beings living in a universe that is vastly, infinitely bigger than us. We don't have godlike powers to prevent natural disasters, on this planet or the wider space around us, from destroying us. Over enough time we may be able to overcome these dangers, though, but we'll always fall short of perfection.

This is also why anyone claiming stuff like "diversity is our strength" are either fools or liars. All groups of life, regardless of size, purpose, location, and time, are formed along homogeneous lines. Usually, the greater the homogeneity, the greater the social cohesion, and greater likelihood that tribe can grow, prosper, and succeed. If diversity is artificially forced into a group, it inherently weakens the group cohesion, making the group itself weaker, from degenerating and corrupting forces from within, and destructive forces from without. The only purpose to pushing diversity is so subversives and despots can gain power over a group that otherwise would reject them.

As a normie acceptable example, think of what sports would be like if we artificially pushed diversity into, say, football, by claiming "unless football accepts basketball into their communities and stadiums, football won't survive". Football then accept basketball into it, and all hell break loose. The basketball players try to play basketball on a football field while the football teams are trying to play football, and the football fans are trying to watch football. It completely breaks the group, its purpose, and its cohesion. This sounds absurd, but this is exactly what's happened to other hobbyist communities like video games, comic books, specific internet forums, etc. People who had no real interest in the hobby invaded, pushed out the people who formed it, and now it's a watered down diverse mess. Subversives love to use this tactic, because once it's watered down and the original inhabitants are censored, shamed, or pushed out, the subversives can push their propaganda through it, which explains all the subversive crap taking/taken over communities.

There are several mistakes that normie tier right wingers make about communities and homogeneity.

First, they think race plays no part, when it's arguably the most important. The root words for nation derive from French and Latin, literally meaning children, parents, ancestry, heritage, family, people, etc. One can't change the people of a group/nation without changing/destroying the group/nation.

Second, they've embraced the concept of self destructive individualism. I can safely assume this is due to subversive influences pushing the idea on the mainstream right wing, to keep it controlled and weak, incapable of truly stopping the people in power. Individualism, by itself, is inherently self destructive because it ignores the welfare of the collective, the group(s) they're in. The individuals may be strong, but th collective is weak, making it easy to subvert from within or destroy from without. Without collective, mutual, shared interests, groups cease to exist, and individuals are easily defeated, enslaved, conquered, and killed. I assume this position is easy to accept for normie right wingers because the argument has been framed in such a way that they view leftists as collectivists (communists), and since leftists/communists are bad/wrong (a correct assertion), that therefore all forms of collectivism are bad/wrong (a false assertion). Collectivism, by itself, is also destructive, but only because it ignores the well being of the individuals, often trampling upon them, weakening the individuals, who in turn weaken the collective, which is then susceptible to insidious forces from within or destructive forces from without. Reality lies somewhere in the middle, a union between individualism and collectivism. All individuals part of a group must sacrifice in some way for the collective health of the group, otherwise the group will cease to exist.

Thirdly, they've been brainwashed to think groups can't gatekeep, and more importantly, that White people can't gatekeep their own borders. It's safe to assume this is why so much White guilt history is taught in schools, much of it either a lie or taken out of context, and anti-White media is pushed out regularly, to perpetually reinforce the propaganda we were taught in schools. Gatekeeping allows the group to remain homogeneous, by controlling who can enter. If gatekeeping wasn't necessary, ancient cities wouldn't have walls surrounding them, castles wouldn't exist, and homes would just be roofs with no walls or doors. Our nations/groups are our homes. We all have the natural right to protect our homes and controls who enters. Good men know they must do this to protect what they love within, which is also why men and the role of men has been intentionally subverted and weakened in society, as it's our evolved/created role as part of every group we're with: protectors. Without the men protecting a group, subversives, tyrants, and invading armies face no resistance.

In any case, back to the topic at hand, we form groups to do and create things we can't do on our own. Nature is harsh. It kills idiots with ease and impunity. Nature (the universe) is built upon truth, with all the rules laid within it. That's why going against truth is so fatal in a harsh environment. Want to go hug the kodiak bears over there? Dead. Want to play with the rattlesnake? Dead. Want to subvert the natural order, put women in power, and allow women to work? Dead. Some truths are more apparent than others, and the less obvious ones take longer to unfold the consequences, but the truth remains. In the beginning stages of civilization, nature will often weed out the stupid quite quickly, and the strongest tribes will quickly (relatively speaking) grow stronger and form city states and then nation states, with strength being derived from adherence to truth. Once a civilization becomes successful, life becomes easier, as paradoxically, we erect barriers between ourselves and nature so we can advance, but it was nature that honed us and taught us the rules in the first place, which enabled our success. Those barriers we erect weaken us over time, preventing nature from weeding out the stupidity. Success also breeds complacence and comfort, as abundance and safety become the norm. Atomization and apathy, especially toward the group, becomes more common and social cohesion plummets, as people face less dire need for the help of others. This is also when subversives are most easily able to infiltrate and corrupt. This explains modern Western civilization perfectly. It's why all civilizations rise and fall.

So, in part I agree with you, and in part I think there's more to it (at least with how you worded it). We form groups for mutual interests, like being able to survive, find a spouse, create families, raise our kids, and our kids to survive and be strong, healthy, and better than we are. However, nature (truth) does the same. It forces us to do this, to group up, out of necessity.

Hedonism and degeneracy run amok. If you interfere with their self destructive pursuit of trying to perpetually feel pleasure, they will kill you. In reality, they're empty inside. They claim the things they do make them happy, but they're depressed and have a hole inside them that can never be satiated with the meaningless crap they keep feeding it, and they wonder why they feel empty.

Isn't this how Africans in the West argue for more gibs, too? They bitch that it's not free, even though by demographic they collect the highest amount of welfare per capita, and yet they perpetually bitch about wanting more, for free.

If she can be convinced that a mother killing her own children is morally acceptable, she could be convinced of anything, and has probably also swallowed all the other globalist talking points, like that marriage is cis white hetero patriarchy white supremacy, meant to enslave women, an outdated and egregious mode of humanity that must be destroyed. She's thoroughly brainwashed and damaged.

The only thing that can change someone like that (toward becoming better) is a lot of pain, sustained over a long period of time, in one form or another. Fortunately, these people's beliefs and habits are so self destructive and wrong it inevitably ends in misery. Unfortunately, they hurt everyone around them, too. Also, depending on their crimes and behaviors, I don't think I'd be willing to accept many (most?) of these people back into a functioning society, community, group, or family, even if they were reformed. God may forgive them, in death, but I'm extremely hesitant to do so, in life.

It was absolutely deliberate. The White guy knew it, too. He entertained the game to stay cordial, but the faces he made when the "judge" was giving the words betrayed his understanding that the game was rigged. It's stuff like this that push more normie Whites to become actually racist and pissed at how we're treated, and the people pushing this are going to keep doing so, at an ever increasing quantity and severity, until something breaks.

Most people didn't fight back even during COVID tyranny.

The White West has been inundated by a massive deluge of propaganda since childhood, from every sector of society. On top of this there's been massive censorship of any dissenting voices, and the West's success has made people comfortable. Comfortable people don't revolt. The people in power have also corrupted our scientific, medical, and food industries, to keep us fat, lethargic, low testosterone, and sick. They release numerous humiliation rituals in news and entertainment media every year, and corrupt every good thing that motivates us, to keep us depressed, inactive, and apathetic. They push hedonistic pleasures as diversions to keep us placated, inactive, and comfortable.

Slowly, however, all of it will either disappear, or more people will notice and reject it. For example, under Covid more parents were realizing what their kids were being taught, and now a record number of parents are homeschooling their kids. The West's success, relative abundance and safety will disappear, the comforts will go away, and misery will reign. This alone will wake up tons of people. We're already in the downward acceleration curve of the collapse, which is why hard right noticing is accelerating rapidly. More and more people are rejecting the hedonistic pleasures offered by these truly evil people, as a record low number of people support Hollywood, who is shooting themselves in the foot, as their propaganda and humiliation rituals have become so blatant. Increasing numbers of people don't trust the medical industry, the government, or what's in the food, and are separating themselves from all of it. More people are growing their own food and looking into gardening, homesteading, buying directly from farmers they trust, and otherwise getting away from cities. More people are rejecting the censorship laden propaganda platforms and moving to truly free speech sites. Good options, in every sector of society, are becoming increasingly numerous, apparent, and used by people rejecting what the evil people at the top have offered us. This is going to keep growing as things get worse.

You really think they will somehow do it later?

Yes. People are still too comfortable. Comfortable people don't revolt. Unfortunately, we'll have to wait a little bit for Western civilization to degrade to the point where a high enough people have noticed, and good leaders have arisen to lead us. Leaders act like condensation points, which is why the people in power know they have to offer us false choice leaders, as effort drains and dissent outlets to keep us ineffectual. However, once the inflection point has been reached, and an effective leader(s) rises, the game is on.

Violence by the right only results in an optics victory for the Regime where they will use it to crackdown even harder on constitutional liberties. Look at what the Democrats did after J6.

They've been using violence against us for far longer than that. Look at Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the Oregon Wildlife standoff, just to name 3. Look at all the White people who have been killed by non-whites under massively disproportionate interracial crime, all while the media and government try their best to hide it so we remain complacent and vulnerable, leading to even more misery and death. Most importantly, all governments, good or bad, always operate under threat of violence. Government, or any authority, literally comes down to "do this, or else". Without the threat of violence, authority holds no power. Government, usually the sole legal authority in the West historically, becomes the biggest arbiter of violence against its people when it becomes corrupt. The corrupt must threaten violence against the people they rule to maintain their rule. They bend the laws, write new laws, and sometimes completely ignore the law to punish anyone that dissents.

Violence is already being used against us, to keep us in line. The war is already at our steps. We just haven't begun to fight back yet. The only relevant questions that need to be asked is: How much grievance can you withstand before you take up arms? Why are you not fighting back already, with how apparently evil things have become? Is it due to your own comfort, or fear, or lack of effective brotherhood and leadership?

Lastly, on this point, they already aim to kill all White people. Do you not think that justifies a violent reprisal? They're going to use their violence and threat of violence against us, no matter what we do. Our mere existence is a danger to them and their plans. Even if we remain perpetually peaceful, it will mean our death. If peace isn't an option to survive, then violence is the only option left to us. I wish it wasn't so. I don't want this any more than you do, but I can't deny the truth. Connected to this, they already call all White people racist and bad inherently, just for existing. If the only way we can placate our murderers is with our wholesale death, then violence is the only option. You don't reverse evil through peace, compromise, and tolerance. The only option is to destroy it, or be destroyed by it.

Violence is not the answer to solving this issue.

Violence is a tool. It can be used by good men or bad men. Unfortunately, Western men, through the reasons listed above, have abdicated their rightful responsibility of protectors, of enactors of violence (when necessary), to government. When government is just, this works out fine, even though men should never fully surrender this right. When government is unjust, abdication of a man's right to violence, of protecting everything he loves, is suicide. The view that "violence is never the answer" is a feminine view, one that's become too common in Western man under the heavy burden of the propaganda, meant to keep us perpetually peaceful, and under feminism, which has corrupted the feminine and inverted the natural order of society, placing women over men, and the feminine aspect over the masculine.

All stable healthy societies are patriarchal, because the intrinsic philosophical priority of men, truth/logic, is more important than the intrinsic philosophical priority of women, life. Men are biologically designed to be the protectors and providers of our families, communities, and societies. We do the dangerous and hard tasks far from home. We're the ones that enact violence, when necessary, on behalf of our kinsmen. If society inverts the natural order, if it prioritizes life, the feminine, over truth/logic, which the West has done, then society dooms itself. This is precisely why the people in power push feminism, because it's an inversion of reality. It destroys the infrastructure that can stop them. This didn't rid ourselves of violence. It only changed hands. Demonization of violence is propaganda from the top, using women as useful idiots who think they know better, because they're easier to brainwash through appeals to emotion, popularity, and authority. The government, the evil within it, now has total control of the dispensation of violence, and it's being used against us.

However, it must be repeated, the threat and dispensation of violence rests with men, first. No one can take that away from us. They can manipulate us to not be violent, but we can reject it. History is replete with examples of problems that can only be solved with violence. Rapists, thieves, murderers, despots, corrupt governments, barbarians at the gate, threat of genocide. These can only be solved by good men becoming violent. No amount of placation and kneeling will ever be enough. Everyone telling you to remain perpetually peaceful is lying to you, or a fool themselves. Remaining peaceful, no matter what, is a suicide pact.

Lastly, on this point, do you live in the U.S.? How was the U.S. founded? To be clear, it was founded directly from good men becoming violent against their oppressors, over transgressions that are miniscule compared to what we're putting up with. If you denounce violence now, but not the violence required to create the country you live in, you're a hypocrite, and don't deserve anything derived from it.

As flawed as the GOP is, it remains the only thing standing in the way of endless Democrat one party rule.

Wrong. The GOP can and will fix nothing. What's happened every single time the GOP has been in power? Pretty much nothing the Democrats did was reversed and things continued to get worse, just more slowly. The GOP has acquiesced on every single issue for the last 100 years. Give it 10 years and they'll be yelling "the left are the real pedophobes". The more you continue to support an ineffectual, corrupt, and false choice, the more you'll continue to get what you've always got. It's insane to expect different results from trying the same thing over and over again.

I vehemently disagree and condemn your suggested route.

That's your right, but you're wrong. Deadly wrong, not just for yourself, but everyone that follows you.

Fortunately, I don't need to convince you. Time will do that for me. All I have to do is wait, and let the world continue to get worse and for your peaceful solutions to continually fail, and for the false choice right to continue to do what they've always done, give us false hope and lie to us. If you fail to recognize the truths I've laid out above, despite the never ending increasing measure of evil in our midst arrayed against us, it's you that's the fool. A collective suicide pact fool. I truly, truly wish you were right, but unfortunately I know I'm right. Heed my warnings, or not. It's your choice.

As much as I appreciate the passion, I've heard this every single election cycle at least since 2000.

People on the right get rightfully pissed at the Republicans between elections for screwing us over, try to mobilize alternate parties or candidates, and if they produce a successful movement it always gets captured, and if not the dissent wanes, and then when an election comes around, they act like they have a repeating memory loss, and say "this is the most important election of our lives, we must vote for the Republicans to save the country". Meanwhile, the Republicans capitulate on every single issue, except with a few recent wins in some states, and everything they said they were going to do when in office never happens, and they almost never reverse any policy, tax, or dystopian tyranny imposed on us by the Democrats, or implement some of their own "for our safety".

At a certain point, a rational man has to realize that the Republican party (and every other normie tier right wing party all across the West), and the people it puts forth as supposed political leaders, is a false choice trap, meant to placate us into thinking we have a legitimate option to resist. These parties and its people, at the minimum, are worthless at solving our problems. They perpetually propose solutions that are a year, 10 years, 100 years too late. We're way, waaay past "reaching across the aisle", or even "lock her up". Even some of the better recent right wing candidates are no longer enough.

In reality, these people are probably not fools, they're controlled opposition. They work for the same people. They're actors meant to fool us into thinking that they serve our interests, fool us into thinking we have a rightful outlet, a leader to represent us and enact our will, someone who will fix our problems and tell the truth, the hard truth. And yet, over and over and over, for decades, they screw us over and don't actually fix our problems. Whether they're weak fools or corrupt liars, the result is the same, and should be treated as such.

Even Governor Abbott is probably posturing with this border mess to win his upcoming election, and will tune it down after he wins. He's done this repeatedly. He talks a big game and does something to rally support every election year, but then becomes a right wing cuck between years. We can see it already, as locals have pointed out that he's only bolstering border defenses on a very miniscule portion of the border, and ignoring everywhere else. Ted Cruz is the same. He talks a big game, but it's all theater. Trump is no longer enough to fix our problems. He may stem the tide, but that too leads to placation of our side, when we actually need to get more angry and more active.

We can hear it in the rhetoric, too. "Only if they come legally". That in itself is a comfortable lie. Not only do Republicans not stop illegal immigration, they advocate for false choice options, and demonize anyone accurately describing the problem as "racists", "White supremacists", and "Nazis", the exact same words the openly globalist left use against us. In the U.S., this immigration problem started in 1965, when immigration was changed from White majority countries, to non-white. "Legality" has nothing to do with fixing the West. It's demographic. Anyone who can't/won't admit this is a fool or liar. Any supposed political leader who can't/won't admit this is the same, and won't fix the issue. Not even Trump, for all his posturing, accurately describes the problem.

This country, and the entire West, has very deep problems, and very deep corruption. Trying to fix just a single serious problem with half assed solutions and comfortable lies, with peaceful and legal means, through a corrupt system and corrupt and/or weak leaders and political parties, who show time and again to be such, is a fools errand. It's suicidally foolish, on a national scale, on a racial scale.

What's the process for actually solving a problem?

1. Identify that there's a problem.

2. Accurately describe and define the problem.

3. Propose possible solutions.

4. Enact those solutions.

5. If those solutions fail, figure out why, and atttempt better solutions.

White people have been attempting the same solution for several decades now, expecting different results, as if the world hasn't changed, as if the corruption, evil, and degeneracy hasn't accelerated exponentionally and made itself clear as day for all to see. We require new solutions, new leaders, and new political parties, and all of it must align with truth, no matter how uncomfortable it is, no matter how dangerous it is, no matter what our enemies call us, no matter what our fake friends call us, no matter what fools call us, no matter what the actual solutions may require. It should be abundantly clear by now that our lives, the lives of our entire race is at stake, that the people in power hate us and are actively replacing us, and that, at least on the federal level, we're not voting our way out of this. Vote in your local and state elections, as they're less corrupt, and we can shore up support locally.

But, be assured that the only solution left to us to actually fix our problems has been made abundantly clear, for a while now, to anyone willing to see it, to anyone willing to sacrifice their own comfort and reject the lies, from both sides. So, prepare for violence.

Feel free to disagree, but remember it after this election.

I was going to mention the same thing. He's a lefty soy who thinks Shadiversity is hard right (lol), he openly supports LGBTQ (one of the reasons he dissassociated with Shad is he didn't want to upset his LGBTQ family members), and the arguments he used to defend himself when the drama was unfolding were logically inconsistent and unsound (apologies but I can't remember the specifics). When commenters pressed him on the failings of his arguments, he deflected and spouted off typical PR garbage that didn't answer anything.

He's a lefty soy hypocrite. He deserves nothing but contept and ridicule, like all the other weak faggots still supporting their own, and their people's, enslavement and replacement. He's just another White traitor more than willing to open the gates to infinity immigration for fear of being called a mean word, like "racist".

No amount of "expertise" these morons hold will ever sway me to listen to them, as their weakness, hypocrisy, and adherence to propaganda will pervade and corrupt everything they do. It's like when a brainwashed idiot tries to explain reality, but perpetually fails because they try to fit reality within the confines of their programming, which itself is just thinly veiled lies. By every measure, their judgment is highly suspect.

Another reminder that the ocean's currents are driven on cold temperature and high salinity, which requires large amounts of ice to lock up the fresh water to enable it, which paradoxically moves more heat toward the poles by transporting warm equatorial waters toward the poles, which is why places like Europe are warmer than they otherwise would be.

Another reminder that we're still coming out of the last ice age, and that the earth's temperatures, grand scale, have nothing else to do but to warm up.

Another reminder that the earth has been much warmer and much colder in the past, without human intervention, and with CO2 levels much higher and much lower, showing that CO2 had almost no impact on climate.

Another reminder that CO2's warming capability slows down dramatically the higher the concentration and that the sun's various cycles are what drives earth's climate, but no climate scientist is allowed to/doesn't talk about it because it would destroy their weak narrative.

Another reminder that if these climate psychos had their way, most life on earth would die from carbon dioxide starvation, since reducing CO2 to the levels they're proposing would kill off most plant life, which thrives on much higher CO2 levels than what we have currently, and we're already really close to low levels of CO2 which would starve and kill off most plant life, as has been studied by numerous scientists for hundreds of years, but modern climate scientists aren't allowed to/don't talk about it.

Another reminder that not a single global warming/climate change model has come true, ever.

Another reminder that climate scientists push their narrative through lying, manipulation, and censorship of dissent.

For more info on this fascinating subject (weather), both now and historically, check out Randall Carlson's podcast Kosmographia. For climate change and related topics specifically, check out episodes 86, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99, 102, and 103.

I've dealt with the same issue. I see it as a multi pronged issue.

Firstly, and most dangerously nowadays, is that most normies are propagandized. Convincing them they've been lied to is almost impossible to break, unless they feel immediate and sharp pain (in some way) because of the lies they've been fed.

Secondly, is that people, regardless of background, education, status, etc., are quick to justify their own actions, words, arguments, and beliefs, no matter how wrong they may be, so they don't have to accept responsibility for being wrong and admitting they have to change. People are very similar to simple physics equations when it comes to changing (a body at rest tends to stay at rest kind of thing), where comfortable people are loathe to change or accept alternative viewpoints unless the falsehoods and lies they believe cause themselves pain. The sharper the pain the more likely they'll change.

However, some people can be so hardheaded/dense/propagandized that they're perfectly willing to walk right off a cliff even if you shout at them the danger. Even truly evil people will justify everything they do. Unfortunately, the success of Western civilization has enabled this problem to get worse, from both aspects. It's enabled evil people to infiltrate our institutions and pump out endless propaganda, and it's enabled comfort among the populace (which is rapidly disappearing). It's like the stages of civilization meme: good times create weak people. It's the paradox of success. When times are hard, nature has more sway, allowing it to more easily weed out stupid people and stupid behavior. People work hard to overcome the challenges of those hard times, erecting barriers between ourselves and the dangers of nature. These barriers make life safer and easier, weakening the people over time, making them comfortable, and infringing upon nature's ability to weed out stupidity.

The entirety of the Talmud is a Rabbinic "interpretation" of the Old Testament, trying to use legalese to lawyer their way out of doing what God commanded them to do, often interpreting scripture to meaning the exact opposite of what God said. Their current behavior is exactly the same as how their ancestors acted.

I actually prefer they continue to do so. It makes spotting them really easy on forums.

To be fair, they're shortening it into a variant that directly resulted in their own epithet, undermining their own hatred and behavior, making them idiots.

"X" in "Xtian" looks too much like a cross, according to jews. Jewish immigrants refused to sign their name next to the "X" on government documentation, and instead signed next to a circle, which is yiddish is called "kikel", which is where the epithet "kike" is derived. Jews hate Christ, Christianity, and Christians that much.

For further proof, jews are the ones who invented the terms "common era (C.E.) and "before common era" (B.C.E.) to avoid using "before Christ (B.C.) and Ano Domini (A.D., Latin meaning "in the year of the Lord"). Jews are also the ones who came up with a different mathematical symbols for addition (﬩) because the normal symbol looked too much like a Christian cross (they also like to use * for multiplication).

Or when blacks refer to a White man as "white boy". It's an intentional insult used to demean and undercut the masculinity of White men.

True, but the medical field is one of those areas where I'm loath to trust anybody. It was taken over, from top to bottom, by the Rockefellers several decades ago, just so they could push their oil based pharmaceuticals. The textbooks, teaching curriculums, practices, schools, teachers, hospitals, doctors, nurses, administrative staff, all of it, is to keep people sick but medicated, to leech as much money from us for as long as possible. There are good people in the field, and some are definitely better than others, but they're taught and trained with corrupted material.

As an example, just look at how many in the medical field did a complete 180 during Covid. We'd had tons of tests on the uselessness of face masks to stop the spread of viral respiratory infections prior to Covid, and we had tested thoroughly and used several medications that could treat Covid, for decades, and all of it completely flipped to serve the narrative, despite all of the previous evidence and experiences. Even people that had prescriptions for those medications, for years, could no longer get them filled because it was labeled "horse dewormer" or some other bullshit.

I've had too many bad experiences from the medical field, heard so many other people experience the same just in my close circle, read too many threads of people saying the same thing, pages upon pages of comments, and read up too much on it to trust the medical field to do anything other than treat symptoms and line their own pocketbooks (like the Afghanistan invasion, the U.S. military defending poppy field production, and the opioid epidemic occurring shortly after, thanks to the Sackler family and others in the pharmaceutical industry, helped along by doctors who overprescribe opiates because they get money to do so, to the detriment and death of millions). The entire field needs to be stripped down from top to bottom and rebuilt.