1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they just don't want to die.

That's just as much of a cop out as greed. Ultimately, if your enemy is going to kill you, regardless of what you do, then it's better to fight than to remain perpetually peaceful.

By your own reasoning, no army in existence would fight, for anything, because the individual is afraid he might die. While this may be true, that individuals may die, it denies the fundamental truth of the collective, that the collective will live, that sacrifices are necessary for the collective to continue. Individualism and collectivism, by themselves, are destructive, because pursuing one by itself robs the other. The truth is in the middle. Every single people, nation, group, and life form in existence groups up (collectivizes) in one form or another to pursue collective interests. The first and most important reason to group up is for mutual survival. If a life form is incapable of pursuing its own survival, it doesn't deserve to exist, and will eventually die out.

This is precisely why White people are being denied our basic human rights, like the right to have our own homes and nations, the right to protect our own borders, the right to control who enters, the right to associate with whom we choose, the right to collective, the right to espouse for our ethnic interests, and the right to defend ourselves. We're being brainwashed, by the left and right, that White people can't collectivize, otherwise that would make us "racists" and "Nazis". They use the exact same language and arguments, centered around the exact same lies.

They could secretly be on your side but unless they occasionally drop hints the result is the same.

That's not good enough. It may have been in the 70s or 80s, when the propaganda and maliciousness was more subtle, but not any more. The only way to defeat lies is to tell the truth. There are zero exception to this. If good men remain silent in the face of lies, they're not truly good men. If good men remain complacent in the face of evil, they're not truly good men. There are zero exceptions to this. Saying otherwise is a coping mechanism, trying to still believe we're "good" men by letting lies and evil persist in our midst while we have the power to resist and stop them.

We're being actively replaced and genocided by people in power that hate us, who have infiltrated and corrupted every institution in every White Western nation, propagandizing our people and children against our collective interests, gaslighting us to remain perpetually peaceful, atomized, brainwashed, stupid, poisoned, fat, apathetic, and weak, to tell us to continue to vote for people that don't reverse the damage, offer us political parties and leaders who always betray us and/or don't go far enough, to tell us to continue to use the corrupted institutions as the only means of fixing what's wrong.

Continuing to go along as if everything's normal, continuing to pursue the same failed "solutions", isn't just stupid, it's suicidally stupid, and not just for each individual, but collectively, as a whole.

Espouse the truth, defend truth, and act in truth, or die. There are no other options.

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the response and clarification to Crowder's positions. Like you said, he's definitely better than most in the mainstream right wing, but, as I've said, that's not high praise, and it's not good enough. Doing the same thing, over and over and over, and expecting a different result is insanity. Mainstream right wingers, in politics and media, continually advocate positions and policies which fail, and yet, the regular people who follow and support the mainstream right wing continually support and vote for these people.

I'm glad Crowder at least brings up racial differences in his show. Still, from what you mentioned, and how he puts it into context, it seems he's still following the mainstream right wing's view on what a nation is. He thinks a nation is completely detached from its people/race, that it's just a gilded cage economic zone, that the best measure of success for a nation is if the GDP and stock market go up, that all racial differences are "socio-economic" factors.

It's all a lie. The root words for "nation" comes from Latin and French, literally translating to family, children, people, ancestry, progeny, race, etc. Our ancestors knew that a nation is derived from its people. There's no such thing as magic dirt. You can't transplant a unique people from one place to another and expect them to act completely differently.

This is why the mainstream right wing is a false choice trap (meant exclusively for White people). Every single election proves that only White people collectively and in majority vote right wing. And yet, the mainstream right wing, both in politics and media, never advocates for White collective interests. It's always vague platitudes detached from the reality that Western nations are White nations. This is why when mainstream right wingers gain political power they don't stop open borders or mass immigration, they don't stop the Kalergi plan (the active replacement and genocide of White people in every Western nation on earth). The right manipulates their useful idiots into thinking "it's fine so long as it's legal". Legal non-white immigration is just as detrimental to White people as illegal non-white immigration. It all leads to the same outcome: the Kalergi plan. In fact, the mainstream right wingers actively acknowledge that the Kalergi plan is happening, and instead of stopping it, they try to gaslight us that we must have "big tent" politics and policies, to try and attract non-white votes, which never, ever pans out. They also decry the left as "the real racists", manipulating us further into thinking that being racist is the greatest sin.

Every other race is granted basic human rights, the ability to have their own homes and nations, to protect their borders and control who enters, to associate with whom they choose, to collectivize, to advocate and espouse for their collective interests, and to protect themselves (violently if necessary) from harmful ideas, institutions, individuals, or organizations that threaten the collective. These aren't just requirements for a nation and people to exist, but for all life to exist. They're fundamental rights, which is why our Founding Fathers (and similar philosophers) have said their "God given" rights. Without those rights, the people, the lifeforms cease to exist, which is precisely why it's being denied to White people, because the people in power are actively trying to kill all of us. And yet, the mainstream right wing enables it to happen, actively gaslights people to accept it, traps people into their own propaganda, preventing people from realizing the totality of truth, and attacks anyone who dares to stray out of their programming.

You asked specifically what false history we're taught. Yes, WW2 is a large part of it. Most of what we're taught about WW2 is a straight up lie. Most of what we're taught about slavery and the Civil War is a lie, or gross manipulation, as well. It's all used to manipulate White people into feeling guilty about what our ancestors did, to guilt us into not seeing race, to guilt us into not collectivizing for our ethnic interests, even if it means we'll die by not doing it. The history we're taught is used as a bludgeon against White people, and it's reinforced by identical propaganda and lies put out by Hollywood, which is why Hollywood makes so many films and TV shows about the Civil War, slavery, WW2, and the Holocaust. Propaganda has to be continually reinforced, otherwise people begin to question and break free, because reality itself destroys lies. White people weren't the only ones guilty of slavery, but yet we're the only ones told to feel perpetually guilty for it. White people weren't the only ones guilty of horrific wars, but yet we're the only ones told to feel perpetually guilty for it. White people aren't the only ones whose ancestors did bad things, yet we're the only ones told to feel guilty for it. No other race is told to feel collective guilty for past crimes we didn't commit.

The mainstream right wing goes along with these historical lies, and couch it in unique propaganda to the right. "The allies were the good guys." "The Democrats are the real racists." "I stand with our military and police." "Israel is our greatest ally." The propaganda and messaging is unique to the left and right, but the result is the same.

The mainstream right wing also advocates for policies that perpetually fail. They always talk big, but almost never do anything to fix stuff they bitch about. Voter fraud? Better have a new investigation that leads to no arrests or changes. Pharma fraud? Covid scam? Same. Open borders and mass immigration? Same (better yet, transport the illegals further into the country to "own the libs"). Another war started over false flags and lies? Same (gotta keep the military industrial complex running so the politicians can get more kick backs). New offshoots start up, from people disgusted by the mainstream right wing, and they eventually get infiltrated and swallowed by the mainstream right wing. This happened to the Tea party and the MAGA movement.

The mainstream right wing, even though it labels itself as "conservative", has conserved nothing for the last several decades. They have abdicated, acquiesced, compromised, and surrendered on every single issue. Marriage, no fault divorce, gender differences (the woman is the mother and home maker and the man is the protector and provider), gay marriage, LGBTQ, transgenderism, race/gender quotas, affirmative action, etc. Give it 5-10 years, and the mainstream right wing will be vociferous advocates for pedophilia, and decrying "the left are the real pedophobes".

If the mainstream right wing adopts every single position, policy, and idea of the openly globalist left, if every single policy they push fails, than at some point, a rational person must realize that, at the minimum, they're a failed outlet, and more accurately, are controlled opposition, a false choice trap.

This hypocrisy of the mainstream right also comes in the form of "vote harder [current year]", no matter how bad things get, no matter how corrupt our institutions become, no matter how much we're hurt and killed. Our ancestors would've revolted decades ago and killed all the people responsible. And yet, the mainstream right wing, hilariously, advocates for perpetual peace, while simultaneously and proudly decrying their support for the military and police, which fundamentally use violence to solve problems. We're constantly gaslit that if anyone wants to organize or stop the people in power outside the blatantly corrupt institutions that are fucking us over, we're "feds" and "glowies", while living in nations founded on our ancestors doing great violence to create them.

In every conceivable metric, the mainstream right wing isn't good enough. They're actively harmful to White people. They can't be trusted, shouldn't be listened to, and shouldn't be voted for. A traitor in your midst is more dangerous than an entire army at the gates, and thus traitors should be dealt with more harshly. And yet, these fuckers are opening the gates, and keeping them open, to the invading armies, and gaslighting us into accepting it.

Crowder may be better than most in the mainstream right wing, but he's not good enough. If the leaders you follow continually fail, figure out why, and find new leaders.

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's fair. However, as I pointed out in another comment (and many other comments previously), pretty much the entire mainstream right wing is a false choice trap. There are malicious actors, those driven by money to play along, and useful idiots who still buy the propaganda. No matter the reason, the results are the same. It would be wiser and safer to assume everyone that's made it big in the mainstream right to be controlled opposition.

If you're knowledgeable about Steven Crowder, perhaps you can answer something for me. Does he discuss jewish over representation in every societal aspect that's hurting us? Does he discuss false history and the true history that's being hidden from us? Does he discuss racial differences?

Those are the 3 main verboten topics both the left and right censor to keep people controlled. There are obvious differences in rhetoric/propaganda on the left and right to keep the people controlled. However, they both censor these 3 topics, so no matter who is in power, White people never collective, and the Kalergi plan continues unabated. Right wing normies also respond exactly the same as useful idiot lefties when confronted with these topics, and use the exact same language and "arguments" in refutation, and names to call anyone who espouses them.

This ultimately boils down to one simple philosophical concept: do they prioritize truth over all else, no matter how uncomfortable it is, no matter how much they're punished for speaking it, no matter how much they have to sacrifice to pursue it. If someone places anything else over truth, it means that, ultimately, they're not your friend, and will fail in one way or another, and bring down everyone who follows them with them. One may argue the veracity of the above 3 topics, but if one never even broaches the topic, especially with how blatant the lies have become, it probably means they're malicious, greedy, or a useful idiot.

2
ApexVeritas 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a really simple rule to figure out if a politician or political pundit is actually on your side. Do they know about and discuss the verboten topics both the left and right censor? If so, they're not on your side. This could mean they're maliciously involved, or keeping quiet for money, or a useful idiot who still buys the propaganda, but no matter the reason, the results are the same. They're a mouthpiece for the people in power.

5
ApexVeritas 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey, at least you're capable of admitting to the "consequences" Germany (and now the entire West) is facing due to the outcome of WW2. Good for you IDF shill.

2
ApexVeritas 2 points ago +3 / -1

A good man can prioritize truth over money. That doesn't mean a good man must make no money, but when a "good" man prioritizes making money over telling the truth, then yes, they're (at minimum) a grifter, but more accurately a liar, and should've be believed or listened to by actual good men. But, yes, pretty much everyone in the mainstream right wing is a false choice trap.

18
ApexVeritas 18 points ago +18 / -0

Germany has been ruled by non German people and interests since WW2. The entire West is now under the thumb of blatantly anti-White people. How can you not see this? We didn't vote for any of this crap. It's not by our choice. We didn't choose to indoctrinate our own children for decades. We didn't choose to insert propaganda into movies and TV shows. We didn't choose to get fed propaganda and lies in the news and media.

4
ApexVeritas 4 points ago +4 / -0

When the incompetency reaches a certain point, it becomes indistinguishable from malicious destruction.

-6
ApexVeritas -6 points ago +5 / -11

That's pretty rich coming from Crowder, who openly derided Ben Shapiro, Jeremy Boreing, and the Daily Wire for giving him such a shitty contract a year or two ago, and warning other "right wingers" to avoid such toxically bad contracts in the future.

I was on Crowder's side during that debacle, but it now looks like it was just controlled opposition assholes fighting each other.

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +3 / -2

I learned this from lots and lots of research I did years ago. It was back when Obama was president, and the mainstream media were making zero sense. It was also back when Google wasn't censoring and curating their search results nearly as much, so you could still find relevant search results for verboten info. So, I began to do my own research, on numerous subjects.

With regard to the Syrian civil war and the formation of ISIS, I found numerous (often on obscure low profile websites and news agencies willing to post this info) articles written by former intelligence and military people (who disagreed with what we were doing over there), honest journalists (most of them foreign), and others who were detailing what was actually happening in Syria. I was posting all of this on Facebook, back when that was still possible. I deleted all of my Facebook posts when their censorship became apparent and cleaned out my profile. You can probably still find all of this info if you do a bit of digging yourself, with specific search querries on every claim I'm making here, but you'll have to use Yandex. Be ready for doing a lot of reading and be able to put the pieces together, because most of the articles I came across were rather specialized on one specific topic. There wasn't one article that laid it all out and made all the connections, at least not one that I found.

Here are the things I found, that are specific enough you can search for:

There were some Middle Eastern journalists (don't remember their nationality) who found Turkey aiding and abetting ISIS militants. There were numerous first hand accounts from Syria disproving the Obama administration, NATO, and the mainstream media, who were all lying about Assad using chemical weapons against his own people. The first hand accounts said it was either the rebels (before ISIS was formed) using the chemical weapons, or aftermath of conventional weapons made to look like chemical weapons by the mainstream media, or faked entirely by the mainstream media. They (the Obama admin and NATO) used this lie to fund, train, and arm the Syrian "rebels". There were even mainstream media articles detailing/bragging about this, and you might still be able to find them. It was those "rebels" that eventually turned into ISIS. There were also several reports of ISIS being armed with weapons paid for by NATO, using the CIA, and funneling them to ISIS through Turkey. Mossad was also clearly involved. There's also tons of pictures of ISIS with numerous mint condition Toyota trucks. There was also the fact that ISIS, for some weird reason, had incredibly high budget media personnel and equipment, enabling them to put out really high quality execution and propaganda media, which again is really weird, considering no terrorist organization before or since has come anywhere close to that level of media production (like it was being produced by a big budget Hollywood studio with millions of dollars of funding). ISIS claimed to be Muslim extremists, but they weirdly never attacked Israel or jews. They predominantly targeted Christian and non Muslim minorities in Syria (this is a common tactic for anti Christian jews and zionists historically, especially in the Middle East as zionists are actively destablizing surrounding countries to enact the Greater Israel plan). The one time ISIS attacked Israel, they publically apologized. The only motives that made sense for the West to create ISIS and screw over Syria was 4 fold: so a Middle Eastern country (can't remember which one) could run an oil and gas pipeline through Syria and into Europe, so the Rothschilds could gain access to Syria's oil and gas (like I said, they slant drilled from northern Israel into southern Syria's oil to steal it during the civil war), to put pressure on Russia (they wanted to start a proxy war with Russia even back then), and to further their Greater Israel plan. Syria was/is Russia's only ally in the region, which is why Assad denied the oil and gas pipeline through his country, as it would compete with Russia's oil and gas exports into Europe (remember how the U.S. blew up one of Russia's undersea pipelines into Europe recently). Thus, the Obama admin and NATO created ISIS and lied about Assad to try and oust him. They did the exact same thing in Libya to Gaddafi, and with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt during the "Arab Spring". In fact, there's really good info that the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya (where ambassador Stevens and a few CIA contractors died), was because the Libyan rebels (which we similarly armed to oust Gaddafi, because he dared to go against the international bankers and try to implement a gold standard in his country) were getting pissed that we were taking their weapons away and funneling them to the Syrian rebels, flying them into Turkey and smuggling them across the border. That was ambassador Stevens' job there, to help funnel those weapons. It's also why Obama amd Hillary tried so desperately to sweep Benghazi under the rug. It's also been suggested they wanted Stevens to be killed, so he would never have a chance to talk about what he did (as a middle man), as we had military assets that could've reached them in time, and were in the air already heading toward Benghazi, but were ordered to be turned around. Even though I'm no longer a Trump supporter, he clearly put a damper on whatever plans these assholes had in Syria, because immediately after Trump got into office, ISIS disappeared, virtually overnight, like they had all their funding, personal, and support taken away. Muslim extremists don't act that way, which means the entire organization was being controlled, from top to bottom, by the CIA and Mossad.

This is most of what I could remember off the top of my head. This is already quite long, and if you haven't heard of this stuff, you have s lot of research to do. But, again, use Yandex. All Western search engines are unreliable for finding this stuff nowadays. For context, keep in mind that the Syrian civil war happened right after Libya, which happened right after the Muslim Brotherhood coup in Egypt, which happened right after Iraq, and during the latter part of the deadliest part of the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan. It was called the "Arab Spring", which was complete bullshit meant to give cover to Western meddling in the Middle East. Look up articles for how the Egyptians felt after Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood coup in Egypt. It was crap like this that made people suspect that Obama was secretly a Muslim. Although, looking back at it now, it's obvious that most of those "Muslim" extremist organizations and terrorists were being run, in part or entirely, by the U.S. and Israel.

5
ApexVeritas 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's the rule I've settled on in almost every sphere, not just gaming. I do a lot of research to find good products, which has turned into researching companies that don't express woke poison. Gab has enabled me to find companies that aren't just neutral, but express my views, which is nice. It's just a shame that Torba outed himself recently as a grifter and seems intent on destroying his platform.

22
ApexVeritas 22 points ago +23 / -1

Remember how ISIS destabilized Syria so oil tycoons could put an oil and gas pipeline from the Middle East through Syria and into Europe, but Assad refused because he's an ally with Russia, and Russia makes a lot of money by exporting oil and gas to Europe?

Remember how ISIS destabilized Syria so much that one of the Rothschilds began slant drilling from northern Israel into southern Syria's oil reserves, stealing it, while Syria couldn't effectively stop them?

I'm sure this is just a big cohencidence.

33
ApexVeritas 33 points ago +37 / -4

Even if it was ISIS, it became well known during the Syrian civil war that ISIS was created by, funded by, trained by, armed by, and (no doubt) led by the CIA and Mossad. ISIS is a NATO creation in every aspect.

18
ApexVeritas 18 points ago +18 / -0

This particular Youtuber (Leather Apron Club) has quite a few videos where he notices jewish over representation. He also has really good videos on the myth of high jewish IQ, on the false history of Greeks and Romans being gay, the myth about the Civil War being about slavery, and many more, all worth a watch. The dude does his homework and presents really good arguments.

5
ApexVeritas 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, I'd imagine this problem, as with many others, forseen or not, probably falls under corruption and tyranny, generally speaking, which should be fixed by the 2nd Amendment (the catchall solution to these problems), if the people are willing to enforce it themselves, rather than insist on "voting harder [current year]" as the only acceptable solution.

7
ApexVeritas 7 points ago +7 / -0

If I remember correctly, I also saw a story where Tyson Foods had just finished, or started building a huge insect factory or processing plant in the U.S.

14
ApexVeritas 14 points ago +14 / -0

Also, didn't they say they're going to start putting insects in all their "meat" products? Or am I thinking of a different company?

4
ApexVeritas 4 points ago +4 / -0

While not specifically due to "rot" (as per the OP's intentions), the most obvious example of Western civilizational collapse/corruption is the anti-White agenda becoming more open and brazen (since White people built and maintain Western civilization). There are numerous ways this is expressing itself, and accelerating, but the worst offense, that's getting progressively louder, is the non-white criminals who commit crimes against White people, even up to murder, are now openly acquitted of their crimes, because they're non-white, and they hurt White people. This isn't a one off thing, either. Examples of this are happening more and more. We're only in the middle stages of the Kalergi plan genocide of White people. This is going to keep getting worse.

13
ApexVeritas 13 points ago +13 / -0

but if they are taking your side, why attack them?

They're not taking our side. They serve the same people as the openly globalist left. The people in power know that one of the best ways (but not only ways) to control people is to give them the illusion of choice. Modern politics is a false choice dichotomy. Mainstream political media is also a false choice dichotomy. Every mainstream right winger is a false choice trap, meant to keep people stupid, weak, ineffectual, and controlled. If those false right wingers didn't exist, the people they trap would be able to actually figure out how much they're getting screwed, figure out what's actually wrong, figure out what actually works, and figure out correct paths forward.

As two easy examples in the political sphere...Do you remember what happened when the Republicans gained power after Obama, after years of saying "we'll repeal Obamacare"? They didn't repeal it. Obamacare has increased insurance costs by 3-10 fold, and reduced insurance coverage by several factors, and yet, the Republicans didn't repeal it. Why? Because they're not our friends. They're traitors. Do you remember what happened, after any of the number of times the Republicans have bitched about open borders and mass immigration, and they gained any power? They do nothing to close the border and stop mass immigration. Why? Because they're not our friends. They're traitors. Until recently, I haven't seen a single Republican politician, in any way, actively voice concern for or advocacy for White people, who are their largest voting bloc. For reference, I've seen two very recent stories of local/city Republican politicians getting into trouble for espousing White interests. With extremely few examples, the false choice right has capitulated, caved, and acquiesced to every single issue over the last several decades. They haven't conserved anything. They haven't pushed back and regained ground they've lost. They've actively embraced several positions of the left, to try to "win" votes. They've also tacitly admitted that they know the Kalergi plan, to replace and genocide White people, is indeed happening, but rather than try to stop it, they're actively catering to our replacements, to try to "win" votes. No other demographic votes majority right wing, except for White people. This voting data is available every year, and the pattern is repeated every year, for decades. This can't be due to stupidity or greed. The only motive that makes sense is malice.

A single traitor is more hazardous to a people than an enemy at the gate. Traitors should be dealt with first, and more harshly. Matt Walsh, Ian Miles Cheong, the Daily Wire, PragerU, Fox news, Black Rifle Coffee Company, to name a few, are all false choice traps, traitors in our midst, pretending to be one of us, but are our enemies. They need to be treated as such.

11
ApexVeritas 11 points ago +12 / -1

It's impossible for gays to marry. Marriage is intrinsically linked to one man and one woman coming together to form a complete human. We're sexually dimorphic. We can only continue the species through marriage, which is why monogamy has been so ardently defended by past peoples and in successful civilizations, to keep the people healthy. Every other variation of coupling, and for any other reason, is larping at best, and more accurately a myriad of the now multitudes of degeneracy, all of which is based on a lie.

It should be noted that in ancient times, a government didn't need to give you a contract to tell you that you were married. The act of sex itself (between a man and a woman) was considered "marriage", and one of the few ways an actually married couple could get a divorce, if one of them cheated (married) with another. Trying to claim that gays can marry is a modern degenerate lie. There are other, far more accurate words, that describe what they do, which is the complete inversion to the meaning, purpose, and virtue of marriage.

It doesn't matter how much you try to capitulate and compromise with evil. They'll always push further. They thrive on your apathy. You can't "I dont care" your way out of the massive hole we're in. That path only leads to a deeper hole. The only way out is with truth.

9
ApexVeritas 9 points ago +10 / -1

We're still on the identical course to the fall of Rome, including the hiring of foreigners for military recruitment, and all the problems that brings, with an extra addition of Weimar degeneracy, evil, and communist revolutionaries. Still, even the despotic Roman leaders didn't hate their own people like ours do of Whites. This is probably going to end up being the fastest collapse of a highly successful civilization that the world will ever see.

12
ApexVeritas 12 points ago +12 / -0
  1. Not being White.

  2. If White, be as cucked as humanly possible and accept that your race doesn't deserve a country of its own, doesn't deserve any natural rights, you can't collectivize, you must accept that you and your ancestors are inherently evil, and you must accept your people's ethnic replacement and genocide with open arms. There are a few other caveats sureounding God's "chosen people", too.

18
ApexVeritas 18 points ago +18 / -0

He managed to attract Elon Musk on Twitter over this, and the gentleman in question flat out refuses that he shared any such content, saying it was other people sharing those "hateful" memes, in a private Discord, 7 years ago, and this is only surfacing now, because of his involvement in politics, and the establishment is targeting him over literally anything. I believe him, but it's not like his tacit proclamation of "I'm not racist" will save him.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›