How common is it for barges to come loose during flooding? How common is it for multiple barges to come loose during flooding? I've never heard of this happening, and flooding isn't an uncommon occurrence. It's always happening somewhere.

The foreigners are also much more inept than Whitey, and can't maintain what we built.

Despite what many of us claim, the cabal/globalists/people in power/whatever we call them aren't monolithic. There are different interests within that umbrella group, and sometimes those different interests conflict.

For example, you're right that they want (White people and nations) weakened, but, they also need us to fight wars for them. Wars help them weed out strong White men from the gene pool, help to prop up the military industrial complex, help to perpetuate the petro dollar, help to uphold OPEC and oil tycoons, help to regime change, help to enforce banker interests, etc. However, with the military recruitment crisis being one example, they've begun to experience the consequences of their own actions in undermining the White West, where one of their interests is infringing upon the other. Keep in mind that ultimately, these people are liars. Everything they do results in destruction. They may appear to be intelligent, with how much power they currently wield, but they're ultimately fools, because they've aligned themselves with the antithesis of truth. This makes them malicious, and ultimately stupid.

You jest (probably being part/mostly serious), but I've seen lots of lefties bitch about and lambast anyone who has been attacked by diversity, and commit the wrongthink crime of openly talking about it, or God forbid, protecting themselves or calling the cops.

By your logic, are you one of the 90% feds?

I remember a "news" article coming out a few years ago after a mass shooting. I believe it was from the NYT. The writer claimed he shot an AR15, and described the experience like he went through the worst hells of WW1 and WW2 combined, got PTSD and disoriented from the explosions, and injured his shoulder. He was thoroughly mocked all across the internet, and several Youtubers demonstrated how low the AR15 kicked. One guy even shot it off of his nose.

The butt of the weapon sitting higher on the shoulder is fine for the 5.56. The AR15 has almost zero kick so it can be comfortably shot in that position for a long while, and it provides better ergonomics so you don't have to lower your head to the sights. You'd want better shoulder positioning for higher caliber rifles, though, as some kick so hard even a well positioned rifle hurts like hell.

In any case, I'd like to draw attention to the dude's nose.

Solution?

Tax and oppress White men more, import more non-whites, and subsidize 3rd world shitholes that are the source of most of the world's pollution.

conjecture

Nah mate. It's money and corruption.

There's definitely some idiots in those fields, but that field is run by money and corruption.

I wouldn't have high hopes for that. Trump threw those people under the bus. He could've pardoned them before he left office in 2020. I don't follow his social media any more, but from what I've seen (please correct me if wrong), he's made very few statements in defense of the J6 political prisoners, and applied zero political pressure to get those people released.

I get what you're saying, but rooftop action is defensive in nature. We've been "holding the line" and losing for decades. We must fight back aggressively, regain ground, and kick out the offending parties. You don't win wars by sitting in your fort.

The government is capable of applying high intensity force, but doesn't have the manpower to apply it in high quantity across numerous locations. The people far, far outnumber government forces.

This is why they brainwash people (even on the right) into thinking they don't have a chance in fighting the government. It's also why they brainwash the right (people most likely to resist the government, and mostly made up of White people) to never, ever collectivize, so we don't protect each other. Atomized individuals are really easy to dominate. It's also why they brainwash the right that violence is always wrong (the "fed" and "glowie" memes).

It's all a controlling tactic to keep peoppe peaceful and subjugated. The people in power know that if we collectivize and fight back, we win. Everything else is a half measure doomed to failure, because the people in power control almost all institutions capable of solving our problems peacefully.

At first. We're only in the middle stages, where it starts to become obvious.

Good luck bro. I have family dealing with the same issue.

"We must accept abortion/open borders/mass immigration/LGBTQ/transgenderism/pedophilia or we will never win another election!"

• the GOP

The globalist left: "white people use their institutional power to systemically oppress non-whites, women, and LGBTQ"

[White people] "...without power over you"

If these people were logical, at all, this would force them to change their mind on one argument or the other. The fact that they're not logical makes people like this incredibly frustrating, because they can't be dealt with through peaceful means.

It's impossible to have a genuine debate or good conversation with such people. It's impossible to change their minds. They don't leave us alone, and insist on taking over every space we build for ourselves, even after fleeing from their ever expanding corruption. They follow us, like parasites. They, unironically, leave only one option for good people, in how to deal with people like them. Talking doesn't work. Debate doesn't work. Isolation doesn't work. The only thing that's left, is...

"Oy Vey! They want to cremate me 6 million times!"

-gopower2024

This is why logic is a key way to identify them and dismantle their arguments. They use logically unsound, inconsistent, and fallacious arguments. You'll never "win" an argument with them using logic, as they've openly embraced the antithesis. It's more for you and those listening. The specific example you bring up is an ad hominem logical fallacy.

Britain was the one that egged on Poland to instigate a war with Germany. Britain made a secret pact with Poland, that if war broke out, no matter who started it, that Britain would ally with Poland against Germany. It was all a ruse to start a war with Germany, since Britain didn't give a shit about Poland, since the "allies" declared war on Germany for invading Poland, but not Soviet Russia for doing the exact same thing and in the exact same month.

There are and were several users here who like to use that term, as well as many more on TheDonald (as little as I visit that forum now). Antonio, Imp, and DrJester to name the most prominent. Except for DrJester and gopower2024, it's possible to have legitimate discussions with those users. However, the moment the discussion veers anywhere close to racial differences or jews, they sperg out and declare you a Nazi. It's really weird behavior, and probably why many here have begun to notice the verboten patterns more, precisely because their attitudes on these subjects make reasonable people question their motives and arguments.

Same thing happened to me back when DrJester was posting under his main account. I got into a debate with him, then I come back the next day and found all of my comments, going back a month or so, all get 1 downvote. Was hilarious.

LOL

Your test proved the point quite succinctly.

Collectivism isn't inherently wrong. That's a false belief pushed on the right to make people take up self destructive individualism, where it's not counterbalanced with collectivism. It's to make the right (White people) not collectivize, making us much easier to control, to make us act like atomized individuals devoid of all commonality and mutual interests, so we don't group up and fight back. Individualism and collectivism, by themselves, are self destructive. They must be married.

Furthermore, if you think all peoples, races, animals, plants, and lifeforms are identical, amd the only differences are "socio-economic" factors, you're deluded. Discrimination, the ability to see two different things are different, is a necessary foundation for wisdom (and survival). If you intentionally ignore those differences to appeal to idiots (normies), you're also stupid. But, like I said in the previous comment, I actually agree with you that we shouldn't jump straight to the end of the conversation. Normies (people still plugged into the propaganda) require time and subtlety to break down the propaganda they've been fed.

This has been discussed ad nauseum on /pol/ for many years. If it can be statistically proven that every institution that's pushing this stuff is overwhelmingly jewish, far beyond their population percentage (which is usually between 0.5-2% in the average Western nation), that means jews have an inordinate responsibility for these bad things. You're right that other people are involved, which is why I prefer the term "globalist", which is all encompassing, and more normie friendly until we get to the really propaganda breaking bits about jewish involvement in various things.

However, ignoring jewish over representation is really, really stupid. It's like claiming crime stat differences by race doesn't exist because "White people do crimes, too". Saying this means you have zero understanding of per capita. It's just as stupid as saying "I saw a friendly bear at the circus once, therefore all bears are friendly". You're using exceptions to try to disprove the rule.

This doesn't mean you have to jump to the end and decry "all jews bad", but it certainly doesn't mean you should ignore jewish over representation in bad things. It's called pattern recognition. It's a learned survival trait so you can figure out what's good for you and what's bad for you. Ignoring pattern recognition intentionally is identical to shooting yourself in the foot while running away from a bear.

Left wingers are absolutely fine with collective guilt (so long as it's applied against White people), or positive collective pursuits (so long as it's not White people). Right wingers are fine with collective guilt (so long as it's Muslim Middle Easterners, illegal aliens, or White people) or positive collective pursuits (so long as it's not White people). The left has a vocal minority that despises zionism (because of what jews are doing to the Palestinians), while the right prizes itself on "judeo-Christian" values and the biggest supporter of Israel.