Just this once, I'm not sure he's wrong. You're talking about a country that's 99% in favour of Sharia, forty percent in favour of suicide bombers.
How long do you need to spend in a colony (because that'd be what it would become) if your aim is to protect the population from themselves?
Given that they're obsessed with power politics, look at it this way:
-
the fall of Kabul doesn't threaten the Biden administration, particularly. I mean, yes, they might well have just handed the country to China, but I'm not sure Biden will see that as a bad thing - he seems to be in the process of liquidating the US's assets for the purpose of handing them to China anyway.
-
Americans asserting themselves at the administration's expense is a clear and present danger to the continuing operating of the Biden administration. I'd be interested to see who in the riot was on the Federal payroll, is this another Whitmer affair where the guys at the sharp end are all Feds trying to string people along to their detriment?
You're right. I had assumed, foolishly as it turned out, that you might pick some from here.
You might as well point at a random Reddit sub and start screeching "SEE! SEE!"
I might also point out that I do have some sympathies for your being butthurt, but that would appear to have more to do with the stick up your ass than anything I've done.
I'd laugh at the to-be-expected idiocy from Sultana, if the Home Office didn't have a habit of going and doing more or less what Labour says, bugger the fact that they lost the last election.
Who do I have to vote for the get the Home Office to listen to it's duly appointed ministers?
I'm still not sure how much of that is Thunberg debasing herself for attention and how much of it is her being manipulated by all around her.
Not that it matters, she doesn't appear to object to being some pliant puppet that's wheeled out to berate world leaders or not oppressing their citizens enough.
In 1988 “the government of Afghanistan made truly ‘heroic’ efforts to stop the 40th Army from leaving at any cost,”
Seems the Afghan government has learned that trick quite well, doesn't it? I'm sure that it's merely a coincidence that this, should it actually work for once, would save them having to show anything for the billions of dollars they have received in aid.
And then wrapping themselves in an LGBTQ flag to deflect criticism.
Which, of course, is why they're never going to sell to anywhere except the People's Congress of the Soviet Union. They've marked any feedback that isn't mindless affirmation as "hate speech" and then wonder why they don't get any better.
A couple of questions, because I'm not familiar with this at all
When she says "A more traditional public health model" does she mean that healthcare administrators no longer get to decide who gets to have a business?
Also, which "tough decisions" is she talking about? I can't figure it out from the video...
Do you actually enjoy this?
I mean, your time here is generally characterised by you saying something idiotic and then fielding insults and comments detailing your failings.
That doesn't sound like fun. Unless you're the living embodiment of Airport's Law, I guess.