They were providing legal defence for the Wethermen when they were conducting their bombing campaign, were they not?
What's happening in Portland is the toned-down PR-friendly version, at least until people stop reporting on it and they can go full CHAZ.
And, of course, the BBC would by far prefer to talk about criticism of Marianna Springs (it's remarkable how often "online abuse" is synonymous with "criticism") than about their own disinformation that Springs somehow gives a pass...
"Oh, no, my bad-faith attempts to denigrate people's belief systems were met with hostility!"
Do you not realise how transparent you are?
Do I think Christians are correct about everything?
No, of course not, if I did, I would be one
Do I think picking out specific passages in an attempt to misrepresent the entire religion is a worthwhile exercise on any level?
No, of course not. That'd be like trying to run a cancel culture mob on you for some dumb shit you said as a teenager. Is it representative of the thing as it actually is? If not, why these infantile attempts to own the Christians.
Honestly, people like you are why I barely discuss my atheism, because I'm concerned that when I do, people will think that I am like you
I mean, from what I'm following of his ideology, he's completely correct.
Male men and male women will compete against each other perfectly equally, and the only ones who lose out are the females, at least in the world deGrasse Tyson advocates for
The reason quoted is "Muh GDPR", but, well, that's bollocks.
GDPR doesn't require such a thing, it doesn't enforce any limit in the legislation, so I suspect this is Ubi using the legislation as a fig leaf to cover a source of action they wished to undertake anyway.
The thing is, she's correct, as a matter of law.
Some speech is beyond the pail.
But, and I suspect this is where Plaskett heads off into fairyland, those limitations are small and strict in a free country.
Plaskett seeks to broaden them to people she merely finds politically inconvenient, demonstrating once again that the DNC is about as interested in "democracy" as the GDR was in being a democratic republic.
In this future, almost everyone else has died, to permit this idyllic lifestyle, but that's OK, because they died for "progress"