The rage about AI, especially AI art, I find extremely amusing.
Digital art tools have been about simplifying and automating workflow for decades since the very first Corel Draw hit the market. Photoshop has had 'content aware' for a decade.
People raging against AI art should have been raging that making texture art for video games is only "real art" if you meticulously place each pixel by hand, instead of just taking a photo, digitizing, and filtering it, which is how they've done it since fucking Doom. At the end of the day what is the difference? The amount of tedious labor involved?
Even the argument that 'artists are scared about the idea that art loses all meaning' is worthless, because guess what?
What's the greatest work of art (not music/movie/video game) you can name that's been produced in the last 40 years?
People have pretended that Jackson Pollock wasn't a shithead who should've been stuffed in an oven for decades. He's a faggot and a hack. Art is about worthless nonsense, 'deconstructionalism', and institutionalized irony.
The vast majority of 'artists' make money selling commissions of degenerate furry faggotry on DeviantArt. We could gas everybody who calls themselves an artists and lose nothing of value. They haven't done a single thing worthwhile in my entire life. We got Nig Floyd statues instead.
The rage about AI, especially AI art, I find extremely amusing.
Digital art tools have been about simplifying and automating workflow for decades since the very first Corel Draw hit the market. Photoshop has had 'content aware' for a decade.
People raging against AI art should have been raging that making texture art for video games is only "real art" if you meticulously place each pixel by hand, instead of just taking a photo, digitizing, and filtering it, which is how they've done it since fucking Doom. At the end of the day what is the difference? The amount of tedious labor involved?
Even the argument that 'artists are scared about the idea that art loses all meaning' is worthless, because guess what?
What's the greatest work of art (not music/movie/video game) you can name that's been produced in the last 40 years? Anyone? Bueller?
People have pretended that Jackson Pollock wasn't a shithead who should've been stuffed in an oven for decades. He's a faggot and a hack. Art is about worthless nonsense, 'deconstructionalism', and institutionalized irony.
The vast majority of 'artists' make money selling commissions of degenerate furry faggotry on DeviantArt. We could gas everybody who calls themselves an artists and lose nothing of value. They haven't done a single thing worthwhile in my entire life. We got Nig Floyd statues instead.
The rage about AI, especially AI art, I find extremely amusing.
Digital art tools have been about simplifying and automating workflow for decades since the very first Corel Draw hit the market. Photoshop has had 'content aware' for a decade.
People raging against AI art should have been raging that making texture art for video games is only "real art" if you meticulously place each pixel by hand, instead of just taking a photo, digitizing, and filtering it, which is how they've done it since fucking Doom. At the end of the day what is the difference? The amount of tedious labor involved?
Even the argument that 'artists are scared about the idea that art loses all meaning' is worthless, because guess what?
What's the greatest work of non-musical art you can name that's been produced in the last 40 years? Anyone? Bueller?
People have pretended that Jackson Pollock wasn't a shithead who should've been stuffed in an oven for decades. He's a faggot and a hack. Art is about worthless nonsense, 'deconstructionalism', and institutionalized irony.
The vast majority of 'artists' make money selling commissions of degenerate furry faggotry on DeviantArt. We could gas everybody who calls themselves an artists and lose nothing of value. They haven't done a single thing worthwhile in my entire life. We got Nig Floyd statues instead.
The rage about AI, especially AI art, I find extremely amusing.
Digital art tools have been about simplifying and automating workflow for decades since the very first Corel Draw hit the market. Photoshop has had 'content aware' for a decade.
People raging against AI art should have been raging that making texture art for video games is only "real art" if you meticulously place each pixel by hand, instead of just taking a photo, digitizing, and filtering it, which is how they've done it since fucking Doom. At the end of the day what is the difference? The amount of tedious labor involved?