Exactly this. The genie's already out of the bottle. The best thing to do now is to try and ensure that at least AI development isn't kept under the sole control of a handful of corporate goons.

Also, we don't have to regulate development and access to AI itself in order to try and address some of the risks to workers and the economy. The burden of regulations could instead be applied to the large companies who might try and over-utilize it as a replacement for qualified employees.

Exactly this. The genie's already out of the bottle. The best thing to do now is to try and ensure that at least AI development isn't kept under the sole control of a handful of corporate goons.

Also, you don't have to regulate development and access to AI itself in order to try and address some of the risks to workers and the economy. The burden of regulations could instead be applied to the large companies who might try and over-utilize it as a replacement for qualified employees.

Exactly this. The genie's already out of the bottle. The best thing to do now is to try and ensure that at least AI development isn't kept under the sole control of a handful of corporate goons.

Also, you don't have to regulate AI itself in order to try and address some of the risks to workers and the economy. The burden of regulations could instead be applied to the large companies who might try and over-utilize it as a replacement for qualified employees.

Exactly this. The genie's already out of the bottle. The best thing to do now is to try and ensure that at least AI development isn't kept under the sole control of a handful of corporate goons.

And this is absolutely a "why not both" kind of scenario as well. You don't have to regulate AI itself in order to try and address some of the risks to workers and the economy.

The burden of regulations could instead be applied to large companies who might try and over-utilize it as a replacement for qualified employees, and restrict how widely and deeply it can be employed.